`(declare (ignore ,n-supplied))
`(%verify-arg-count ,n-supplied ,nargs))
(locally
- (declare (optimize (let-convertion 3)))
+ (declare (optimize (merge-tail-calls 3)))
(%funcall ,fun ,@temps)))))
(optional-dispatch
(let* ((min (optional-dispatch-min-args fun))
`(multiple-value-bind (,n-context ,n-count)
(%more-arg-context ,n-supplied ,max)
(locally
- ;; KLUDGE: As above, we're trying to
- ;; enable tail recursion optimization and
- ;; any other effects of this declaration
- ;; are accidental. -- WHN 2002-07-08
- (declare (optimize (speed 2) (debug 1)))
+ (declare (optimize (merge-tail-calls 3)))
(%funcall ,more ,@temps ,n-context ,n-count)))))))
(t
(%arg-count-error ,n-supplied)))))))))
;;; Are there any declarations in force to say CLAMBDA shouldn't be
;;; LET converted?
-(define-optimization-quality let-convertion
- (if (<= debug speed) 3 0)
- ("off" "maybe" "on" "on"))
(defun declarations-suppress-let-conversion-p (clambda)
;; From the user's point of view, LET-converting something that
;; has a name is inlining it. (The user can't see what we're doing