;; From the user's point of view, LET-converting something that
;; has a name is inlining it. (The user can't see what we're doing
;; with anonymous things, and suppressing inlining
- ;; for such things can easily give Python acute indigestion, so
+ ;; for such things can easily give Python acute indigestion, so
;; we don't.)
(when (leaf-has-source-name-p clambda)
;; ANSI requires that explicit NOTINLINE be respected.