(declare (type ref ref) (type combination call) (type clambda fun))
(propagate-to-args call fun)
(setf (basic-combination-kind call) :local)
- (pushnew fun (lambda-calls (node-home-lambda call)))
+ (pushnew fun (lambda-calls-or-closes (node-home-lambda call)))
(merge-tail-sets call fun)
(change-ref-leaf ref fun)
(values))
;;;
;;; Note that there is a lot of action going on behind the scenes
;;; here, triggered by reference deletion. In particular, the
-;;; COMPONENT-LAMBDAS are being hacked to remove newly deleted and let
+;;; COMPONENT-LAMBDAS are being hacked to remove newly deleted and LET
;;; converted LAMBDAs, so it is important that the LAMBDA is added to
;;; the COMPONENT-LAMBDAS when it is. Also, the COMPONENT-NEW-FUNS may
;;; contain all sorts of drivel, since it is not updated when we
;; FUN becomes part of COMPONENT-LAMBDAS now.
(aver (not (member fun (component-lambdas component))))
(push fun (component-lambdas component)))
+ ((eql (lambda-inlinep fun) :inline)
+ ;; FUNs marked :INLINE are sometimes in
+ ;; COMPONENT-LAMBDAS and sometimes not. I (WHN
+ ;; 2002-01-01) haven't figured this one out yet,
+ ;; so don't assert anything.
+ ;;
+ ;; (One possibility: LAMBDAs to represent the
+ ;; inline expansions of things which are defined
+ ;; elsewhere might not be in COMPONENT-LAMBDAS,
+ ;; which LAMBDAs to represent the inline
+ ;; expansions of local functions might in
+ ;; COMPONENT-LAMBDAS?)
+ (values))
(t ; FUN's old.
;; FUN should be in COMPONENT-LAMBDAS already.
(aver (member fun (component-lambdas component)))))
(= (length (basic-combination-args call)) 1))
(let ((ep (car (last (optional-dispatch-entry-points fun)))))
(setf (basic-combination-kind call) :local)
- (pushnew ep (lambda-calls (node-home-lambda call)))
+ (pushnew ep (lambda-calls-or-closes (node-home-lambda call)))
(merge-tail-sets call ep)
(change-ref-leaf ref ep)
(setf (lambda-home clambda) home)
(setf (lambda-physenv clambda) home-env)
+ ;; All of CLAMBDA's LETs belong to HOME now.
(let ((lets (lambda-lets clambda)))
- ;; All of CLAMBDA's LETs belong to HOME now.
(dolist (let lets)
(setf (lambda-home let) home)
(setf (lambda-physenv let) home-env))
- (setf (lambda-lets home) (nconc lets (lambda-lets home)))
- ;; CLAMBDA no longer has an independent existence as an entity
- ;; which has LETs.
- (setf (lambda-lets clambda) nil))
+ (setf (lambda-lets home) (nconc lets (lambda-lets home))))
+ ;; CLAMBDA no longer has an independent existence as an entity
+ ;; which has LETs.
+ (setf (lambda-lets clambda) nil)
;; HOME no longer calls CLAMBDA, and owns all of CLAMBDA's old
- ;; calls.
- (setf (lambda-calls home)
+ ;; DFO dependencies.
+ (setf (lambda-calls-or-closes home)
(delete clambda
- (nunion (lambda-calls clambda)
- (lambda-calls home))))
+ (nunion (lambda-calls-or-closes clambda)
+ (lambda-calls-or-closes home))))
;; CLAMBDA no longer has an independent existence as an entity
- ;; which calls things.
- (setf (lambda-calls clambda) nil)
-
- ;; All of CLAMBDA's variable references belong to HOME now.
- (setf (lambda-refers-to-vars home)
- (nunion (lambda-refers-to-vars clambda)
- (lambda-refers-to-vars home)))
- ;; CLAMBDA no longer has an independent existence as an entity
- ;; which refers to things.
- (setf (lambda-refers-to-vars clambda) nil)
+ ;; which calls things or has DFO dependencies.
+ (setf (lambda-calls-or-closes clambda) nil)
;; All of CLAMBDA's ENTRIES belong to HOME now.
(setf (lambda-entries home)
;;; NEXT-BLOCK (FUN's return point.) We can't do this by DO-USES on
;;; the RETURN-RESULT, because the return might have been deleted (if
;;; all calls were TR.)
-;;;
-;;; The called function might be an assignment in the case where we
-;;; are currently converting that function. In steady-state,
-;;; assignments never appear in the lambda-calls.
(defun unconvert-tail-calls (fun call next-block)
- (dolist (called (lambda-calls fun))
- (dolist (ref (leaf-refs called))
- (let ((this-call (continuation-dest (node-cont ref))))
- (when (and (node-tail-p this-call)
- (eq (node-home-lambda this-call) fun))
- (setf (node-tail-p this-call) nil)
- (ecase (functional-kind called)
- ((nil :cleanup :optional)
- (let ((block (node-block this-call))
- (cont (node-cont call)))
- (ensure-block-start cont)
- (unlink-blocks block (first (block-succ block)))
- (link-blocks block next-block)
- (delete-continuation-use this-call)
- (add-continuation-use this-call cont)))
- (:deleted)
- (:assignment
- (aver (eq called fun))))))))
+ (dolist (called (lambda-calls-or-closes fun))
+ (when (lambda-p called)
+ (dolist (ref (leaf-refs called))
+ (let ((this-call (continuation-dest (node-cont ref))))
+ (when (and this-call
+ (node-tail-p this-call)
+ (eq (node-home-lambda this-call) fun))
+ (setf (node-tail-p this-call) nil)
+ (ecase (functional-kind called)
+ ((nil :cleanup :optional)
+ (let ((block (node-block this-call))
+ (cont (node-cont call)))
+ (ensure-block-start cont)
+ (unlink-blocks block (first (block-succ block)))
+ (link-blocks block next-block)
+ (delete-continuation-use this-call)
+ (add-continuation-use this-call cont)))
+ (:deleted)
+ ;; The called function might be an assignment in the
+ ;; case where we are currently converting that function.
+ ;; In steady-state, assignments never appear as a called
+ ;; function.
+ (:assignment
+ (aver (eq called fun)))))))))
(values))
;;; Deal with returning from a LET or assignment that we are