;;; values cannot, since we must preserve EQLness.
(defun legal-immediate-constant-p (leaf)
(declare (type constant leaf))
- (or (null (leaf-name leaf))
+ (or (not (leaf-has-source-name-p leaf))
(typecase (constant-value leaf)
((or number character) t)
(symbol (symbol-package (constant-value leaf)))
(continuation-proven-type cont)))))
(info (make-ir2-continuation ptype)))
(setf (continuation-info cont) info)
- (let ((name (continuation-function-name cont t)))
+ (let ((name (continuation-fun-name cont t)))
(if (and delay name)
(setf (ir2-continuation-kind info) :delayed)
(setf (ir2-continuation-locs info)
;;; Annotate the result continuation for a function. We use the
;;; RETURN-INFO computed by GTN to determine how to represent the
;;; return values within the function:
-;;; ---- If the tail-set has a fixed values count, then use that
+;;; * If the TAIL-SET has a fixed values count, then use that
;;; many values.
-;;; ---- If the actual uses of the result continuation in this function
+;;; * If the actual uses of the result continuation in this function
;;; have a fixed number of values (after intersection with the
;;; assertion), then use that number. We throw out TAIL-P :FULL
;;; and :LOCAL calls, since we know they will truly end up as TR
;;; the result continuation before it reaches the RETURN. In
;;; perverse code, we may annotate for unknown values when we
;;; didn't have to.
-;;; ---- Otherwise, we must annotate the continuation for unknown values.
+;;; * Otherwise, we must annotate the continuation for unknown values.
(defun ltn-analyze-return (node ltn-policy)
(declare (type creturn node) (type ltn-policy ltn-policy))
(let* ((cont (return-result node))
(declare (type mv-combination call) (type ltn-policy ltn-policy))
(let ((fun (basic-combination-fun call))
(args (basic-combination-args call)))
- (cond ((eq (continuation-function-name fun) '%throw)
+ (cond ((eq (continuation-fun-name fun) '%throw)
(setf (basic-combination-info call) :funny)
(annotate-ordinary-continuation (first args) ltn-policy)
(annotate-unknown-values-continuation (second args) ltn-policy)
(node-ends-block call)
(let ((block (node-block call)))
(unlink-blocks block (first (block-succ block)))
- (link-blocks block (node-block (lambda-bind callee)))))
+ (link-blocks block (lambda-block callee))))
(values))
;;; Annotate the value continuation.
(and (template-note try)
(valid-function-use
call (template-type try)
- :argument-test #'types-intersect
- :result-test #'values-types-intersect))))
+ :argument-test #'types-equal-or-intersect
+ :result-test
+ #'values-types-equal-or-intersect))))
(losers try)))))
(when (losers)
;; to implement an out-of-line version in terms of inline
;; transforms or VOPs or whatever.
(unless template
- (when (and (eq (continuation-function-name (combination-fun call))
- (leaf-name
- (environment-function
- (node-environment call))))
- (let ((info (basic-combination-kind call)))
- (not (or (function-info-ir2-convert info)
- (ir1-attributep (function-info-attributes info)
- recursive)))))
+ (when (let ((funleaf (physenv-function (node-physenv call))))
+ (and (leaf-has-source-name-p funleaf)
+ (eq (continuation-fun-name (combination-fun call))
+ (leaf-source-name funleaf))
+ (let ((info (basic-combination-kind call)))
+ (not (or (function-info-ir2-convert info)
+ (ir1-attributep (function-info-attributes info)
+ recursive))))))
(let ((*compiler-error-context* call))
(compiler-warning "~@<recursion in known function definition~2I ~
~_policy=~S ~_arg types=~S~:>"
;;; Loop over the blocks in COMPONENT, doing stuff to nodes that
;;; receive values. In addition to the stuff done by FROB, we also see
;;; whether there are any unknown values receivers, making notations
-;;; in the components Generators and Receivers as appropriate.
+;;; in the components' GENERATORS and RECEIVERS as appropriate.
;;;
;;; If any unknown-values continations are received by this block (as
;;; indicated by IR2-BLOCK-POPPED), then we add the block to the
(declare (type component component))
(let ((2comp (component-info component)))
(do-blocks (block component)
+ ;; This assertion seems to protect us from compiling a component
+ ;; twice. As noted above, "this is where we allocate IR2-BLOCKS
+ ;; because it is the first place we need them", so if one is
+ ;; already allocated here, something is wrong. -- WHN 2001-09-14
(aver (not (block-info block)))
(let ((2block (make-ir2-block block)))
(setf (block-info block) 2block)