0.8.7.16:

[sbcl.git] / src / compiler / node.lisp

diff --git a/src/compiler/node.lisp b/src/compiler/node.lisp
index 693b1c4..715f246 100644 (file)
--- a/src/compiler/node.lisp
+++ b/src/compiler/node.lisp
@@ -372,7 +372,8 @@
   ;; has already been analyzed, but new references have been added by
   ;; inline expansion. Unlike NEW-FUNCTIONALS, this is not disjoint
   ;; from COMPONENT-LAMBDAS.
-  (reanalyze-functionals nil :type list))
+  (reanalyze-functionals nil :type list)
+  (delete-blocks nil :type list))
 (defprinter (component :identity t)
   name
   #!+sb-show id
@@ -784,9 +785,12 @@
   ;;    :DELETED
   ;;   This function has been found to be uncallable, and has been
   ;;   marked for deletion.
+  ;;
+  ;;    :ZOMBIE
+  ;;    Effectless [MV-]LET; has no BIND node.
   (kind nil :type (member nil :optional :deleted :external :toplevel
                          :escape :cleanup :let :mv-let :assignment
-                         :toplevel-xep))
+                          :zombie :toplevel-xep))
   ;; Is this a function that some external entity (e.g. the fasl dumper)
   ;; refers to, so that even when it appears to have no references, it
   ;; shouldn't be deleted? In the old days (before