(setq found-it t)))
found-it))
-;;; This is like old CMU CL PRE-ENVIRONMENT-ANALYZE-TOPLEVEL, except
-;;; (1) It's been brought into the post-0.7.0 world where the property
-;;; HAS-EXTERNAL-REFERENCES-P is orthogonal to the property of
-;;; being specialized/optimized for locall at top level.
-;;; (2) There's no return value, since we don't care whether we
-;;; find any possible closure variables.
-;;;
-;;; I wish I could find an explanation of why
-;;; PRE-ENVIRONMENT-ANALYZE-TOPLEVEL is important. The old CMU CL
-;;; comments said
-;;; Called on component with top level lambdas before the
-;;; compilation of the associated non-top-level code to detect
-;;; closed over top level variables. We just do COMPUTE-CLOSURE on
-;;; all the lambdas. This will pre-allocate environments for all
-;;; the functions with closed-over top level variables. The
-;;; post-pass will use the existing structure, rather than
-;;; allocating a new one. We return true if we discover any
-;;; possible closure vars.
-;;; But that doesn't seem to explain either why it's important to do
-;;; this for top level lambdas, or why it's important to do it only
-;;; for top level lambdas instead of just doing it indiscriminately
-;;; for all lambdas. I do observe that when it's not done, compiler
-;;; assertions occasionally fail. My tentative hypothesis for why it's
-;;; important to do it is that other environment analysis expects to
-;;; bottom out on the outermost enclosing thing, and (insert
-;;; mysterious reason here) it's important to set up bottomed-out-here
-;;; environments before anything else. I haven't been able to guess
-;;; why it's important to do it selectively instead of
-;;; indiscriminately. -- WHN 2001-11-10
-(defun preallocate-physenvs-for-toplevelish-lambdas (component)
- (dolist (clambda (component-lambdas component))
- (when (lambda-toplevelish-p clambda)
- (add-lambda-vars-and-let-vars-to-closures clambda)))
- (values))
-
;;; If CLAMBDA has a PHYSENV, return it, otherwise assign an empty one
;;; and return that.
(defun get-lambda-physenv (clambda)
\f
;;;; non-local exit
+#!-sb-fluid (declaim (inline should-exit-check-tag-p))
+(defun exit-should-check-tag-p (exit)
+ (declare (type exit exit))
+ (not (zerop (policy exit check-tag-existence))))
+
;;; Insert the entry stub before the original exit target, and add a
;;; new entry to the PHYSENV-NLX-INFO. The %NLX-ENTRY call in the
;;; stub is passed the NLX-INFO as an argument so that the back end
(link-blocks exit-block (component-tail component))
(link-blocks (component-head component) new-block)
+ (setf (exit-nlx-info exit) info)
(setf (nlx-info-target info) new-block)
+ (setf (nlx-info-safe-p info) (exit-should-check-tag-p exit))
(push info (physenv-nlx-info env))
(push info (cleanup-nlx-info cleanup))
(when (member (cleanup-kind cleanup) '(:catch :unwind-protect))
(defun note-non-local-exit (env exit)
(declare (type physenv env) (type exit exit))
(let ((lvar (node-lvar exit))
- (exit-fun (node-home-lambda exit)))
- (if (find-nlx-info exit)
- (let ((block (node-block exit)))
- (aver (= (length (block-succ block)) 1))
- (unlink-blocks block (first (block-succ block)))
- (link-blocks block (component-tail (block-component block))))
- (insert-nlx-entry-stub exit env))
- (let ((info (find-nlx-info exit)))
- (aver info)
- (close-over info (node-physenv exit) env)
- (when (eq (functional-kind exit-fun) :escape)
- (mapc (lambda (x)
- (setf (node-derived-type x) *wild-type*))
- (leaf-refs exit-fun))
- (substitute-leaf (find-constant info) exit-fun))
- (when lvar
- (let ((node (block-last (nlx-info-target info))))
- (unless (node-lvar node)
- (aver (eq lvar (node-lvar exit)))
- (setf (node-derived-type node) (lvar-derived-type lvar))
- (add-lvar-use node lvar))))))
+ (exit-fun (node-home-lambda exit))
+ (info (find-nlx-info exit)))
+ (cond (info
+ (let ((block (node-block exit)))
+ (aver (= (length (block-succ block)) 1))
+ (unlink-blocks block (first (block-succ block)))
+ (link-blocks block (component-tail (block-component block)))
+ (setf (exit-nlx-info exit) info)
+ (unless (nlx-info-safe-p info)
+ (setf (nlx-info-safe-p info)
+ (exit-should-check-tag-p exit)))))
+ (t
+ (insert-nlx-entry-stub exit env)
+ (setq info (exit-nlx-info exit))
+ (aver info)))
+ (close-over info (node-physenv exit) env)
+ (when (eq (functional-kind exit-fun) :escape)
+ (mapc (lambda (x)
+ (setf (node-derived-type x) *wild-type*))
+ (leaf-refs exit-fun))
+ (substitute-leaf (find-constant info) exit-fun))
+ (when lvar
+ (let ((node (block-last (nlx-info-target info))))
+ (unless (node-lvar node)
+ (aver (eq lvar (node-lvar exit)))
+ (setf (node-derived-type node) (lvar-derived-type lvar))
+ (add-lvar-use node lvar)))))
(values))
;;; Iterate over the EXITs in COMPONENT, calling NOTE-NON-LOCAL-EXIT
;; FIXME: It might be better to add another DEFKNOWN property
;; (e.g. NO-TAIL-RECURSION) and use it for error-handling
;; functions like ERROR, instead of spreading this special case
- ;; net so widely.
+ ;; net so widely. --WHN?
+ ;;
+ ;; Why is that bad? Because this non-elimination of
+ ;; non-returning tail calls causes the XEP for FOO appear in
+ ;; backtrace for (defun foo (x) (error "foo ~S" x)) wich seems
+ ;; less then optimal. --NS 2005-02-28
(when ret
(let ((result (return-result ret)))
(do-uses (use result)