bare))))))))
;;; Return a DO loop, mapping a function FUN to elements of
-;;; sequences. SEQS is a list of continuations, SEQ-NAMES - list of
-;;; variables, bound to sequences, INTO - a variable, which is used in
+;;; sequences. SEQS is a list of lvars, SEQ-NAMES - list of variables,
+;;; bound to sequences, INTO - a variable, which is used in
;;; MAP-INTO. RESULT and BODY are forms, which can use variables
;;; FUNCALL-RESULT, containing the result of application of FUN, and
;;; INDEX, containing the current position in sequences.
\f
;;;; utilities
-;;; Return true if CONT's only use is a non-NOTINLINE reference to a
+;;; Return true if LVAR's only use is a non-NOTINLINE reference to a
;;; global function with one of the specified NAMES.
(defun lvar-fun-is (lvar names)
(declare (type lvar lvar) (list names))
(not (null (member (leaf-source-name leaf) names
:test #'equal))))))))
-;;; If CONT is a constant continuation, the return the constant value.
-;;; If it is null, then return default, otherwise quietly give up the
-;;; IR1 transform.
+;;; If LVAR is a constant lvar, the return the constant value. If it
+;;; is null, then return default, otherwise quietly give up the IR1
+;;; transform.
;;;
;;; ### Probably should take an ARG and flame using the NAME.
(defun constant-value-or-lose (lvar &optional default)
sb!vm:n-byte-bits)))
string1))
+;;; FIXME: this would be a valid transform for certain excluded cases:
+;;; * :TEST 'CHAR= or :TEST #'CHAR=
+;;; * :TEST 'EQL or :TEST #'EQL
+;;; * :FROM-END NIL (or :FROM-END non-NIL, with a little ingenuity)
+;;;
+;;; also, it should be noted that there's nothing much in this
+;;; transform (as opposed to the ones for REPLACE and CONCATENATE)
+;;; that particularly limits it to SIMPLE-BASE-STRINGs.
+(deftransform search ((pattern text &key (start1 0) (start2 0) end1 end2)
+ (simple-base-string simple-base-string &rest t)
+ *
+ :policy (> speed (max space safety)))
+ `(block search
+ (let ((end1 (or end1 (length pattern)))
+ (end2 (or end2 (length text))))
+ (do ((index2 start2 (1+ index2)))
+ ((>= index2 end2) nil)
+ (when (do ((index1 start1 (1+ index1))
+ (index2 index2 (1+ index2)))
+ ((>= index1 end1) t)
+ (when (= index2 end2)
+ (return-from search nil))
+ (when (char/= (char pattern index1) (char text index2))
+ (return nil)))
+ (return index2))))))
+
;;; FIXME: It seems as though it should be possible to make a DEFUN
;;; %CONCATENATE (with a DEFTRANSFORM to translate constant RTYPE to
;;; CTYPE before calling %CONCATENATE) which is comparably efficient,
;;; perhaps it's worth optimizing the -if-not versions in the same
;;; way as the others?
;;;
-;;; FIXME: Maybe remove uses of these deprecated functions (and
-;;; definitely of :TEST-NOT) within the implementation of SBCL.
+;;; FIXME: Maybe remove uses of these deprecated functions within the
+;;; implementation of SBCL.
(macrolet ((define-find-position-if-not (fun-name values-index)
`(deftransform ,fun-name ((predicate sequence &key
from-end (start 0)