(defvar *maybe-use-inline-allocation* t) ; FIXME unused
;;; Emit code to allocate an object with a size in bytes given by
-;;; Size. The size may be an integer of a TN. If Inline is a VOP
+;;; SIZE. The size may be an integer of a TN. If Inline is a VOP
;;; node-var then it is used to make an appropriate speed vs size
;;; decision.
-;;; This macro should only be used inside a pseudo-atomic section,
-;;; which should also cover subsequent initialization of the
-;;; object.
-(defun allocation (alloc-tn size &optional inline)
- ;; FIXME: since it appears that inline allocation is gone, we should
- ;; remove the INLINE parameter and *MAYBE-USE-INLINE-ALLOCATION*
- (declare (ignore inline))
+(defun allocation-dynamic-extent (alloc-tn size)
+ (inst sub esp-tn size)
+ ;; FIXME: SIZE _should_ be double-word aligned (suggested but
+ ;; unfortunately not enforced by PAD-DATA-BLOCK and
+ ;; WITH-FIXED-ALLOCATION), so that ESP is always divisible by 8 (for
+ ;; 32-bit lispobjs). In that case, this AND instruction is
+ ;; unneccessary and could be removed. If not, explain why. -- CSR,
+ ;; 2004-03-30
+ (inst and esp-tn #.(ldb (byte 32 0) (lognot lowtag-mask)))
+ (aver (not (location= alloc-tn esp-tn)))
+ (inst mov alloc-tn esp-tn)
+ (values))
+
+(defun allocation-notinline (alloc-tn size)
(flet ((load-size (dst-tn size)
(unless (and (tn-p size) (location= alloc-tn size))
(inst mov dst-tn size))))
(t
(load-size edi-tn size)
(inst call (make-fixup (extern-alien-name "alloc_to_edi")
- :foreign))))))))
+ :foreign)))))))))
+
+;;; This macro should only be used inside a pseudo-atomic section,
+;;; which should also cover subsequent initialization of the object.
+;;; (FIXME: so why aren't we asserting this?)
+(defun allocation (alloc-tn size &optional inline dynamic-extent)
+ ;; FIXME: since it appears that inline allocation is gone, we should
+ ;; remove the INLINE parameter and *MAYBE-USE-INLINE-ALLOCATION*
+ (declare (ignore inline))
+ (cond
+ (dynamic-extent (allocation-dynamic-extent alloc-tn size))
+ (t (allocation-notinline alloc-tn size)))
(values))
;;; Allocate an other-pointer object of fixed SIZE with a single word
;;; set with a single operation and cleared with SHR *PSEUDO-ATOMIC-BITS*,-2;
;;; the ATOMIC bit is bit 0, the INTERRUPTED bit is bit 1, and you check
;;; the C flag after the shift to see whether you were interrupted.
+;;;
+;;; KLUDGE: since the stack on the x86 is treated conservatively, it
+;;; does not matter whether a signal occurs during construction of a
+;;; dynamic-extent object, as the half-finished construction of the
+;;; object will not cause any difficulty. We can therefore elide
+(defvar *dynamic-extent* nil)
#!+sb-thread
(defmacro pseudo-atomic (&rest forms)
(with-unique-names (label)
- `(let ((,label (gen-label)))
- (inst fs-segment-prefix)
- (inst mov (make-ea :byte
- :disp (* 4 thread-pseudo-atomic-interrupted-slot)) 0)
- (inst fs-segment-prefix)
- (inst mov (make-ea :byte :disp (* 4 thread-pseudo-atomic-atomic-slot)) 1)
- ,@forms
- (inst fs-segment-prefix)
- (inst mov (make-ea :byte :disp (* 4 thread-pseudo-atomic-atomic-slot)) 0)
- (inst fs-segment-prefix)
- (inst cmp (make-ea :byte
- :disp (* 4 thread-pseudo-atomic-interrupted-slot)) 0)
- (inst jmp :eq ,label)
- ;; if PAI was set, interrupts were disabled at the same time
- ;; using the process signal mask.
- (inst break pending-interrupt-trap)
- (emit-label ,label))))
+ `(if *dynamic-extent* ; I will burn in hell
+ (progn ,@forms)
+ (let ((,label (gen-label)))
+ (inst fs-segment-prefix)
+ (inst mov (make-ea :byte
+ :disp (* 4 thread-pseudo-atomic-interrupted-slot)) 0)
+ (inst fs-segment-prefix)
+ (inst mov (make-ea :byte :disp (* 4 thread-pseudo-atomic-atomic-slot)) 1)
+ ,@forms
+ (inst fs-segment-prefix)
+ (inst mov (make-ea :byte :disp (* 4 thread-pseudo-atomic-atomic-slot)) 0)
+ (inst fs-segment-prefix)
+ (inst cmp (make-ea :byte
+ :disp (* 4 thread-pseudo-atomic-interrupted-slot)) 0)
+ (inst jmp :eq ,label)
+ ;; if PAI was set, interrupts were disabled at the same
+ ;; time using the process signal mask.
+ (inst break pending-interrupt-trap)
+ (emit-label ,label)))))
#!-sb-thread
(defmacro pseudo-atomic (&rest forms)
(with-unique-names (label)
- `(let ((,label (gen-label)))
- ;; FIXME: The MAKE-EA noise should become a MACROLET macro or
- ;; something. (perhaps SVLB, for static variable low byte)
- (inst mov (make-ea :byte :disp (+ nil-value
- (static-symbol-offset
- '*pseudo-atomic-interrupted*)
- (ash symbol-value-slot word-shift)
- ;; FIXME: Use mask, not minus, to
- ;; take out type bits.
- (- other-pointer-lowtag)))
- 0)
- (inst mov (make-ea :byte :disp (+ nil-value
- (static-symbol-offset
- '*pseudo-atomic-atomic*)
- (ash symbol-value-slot word-shift)
- (- other-pointer-lowtag)))
- (fixnumize 1))
- ,@forms
- (inst mov (make-ea :byte :disp (+ nil-value
- (static-symbol-offset
- '*pseudo-atomic-atomic*)
- (ash symbol-value-slot word-shift)
- (- other-pointer-lowtag)))
- 0)
- ;; KLUDGE: Is there any requirement for interrupts to be
- ;; handled in order? It seems as though an interrupt coming
- ;; in at this point will be executed before any pending interrupts.
- ;; Or do incoming interrupts check to see whether any interrupts
- ;; are pending? I wish I could find the documentation for
- ;; pseudo-atomics.. -- WHN 19991130
- (inst cmp (make-ea :byte
- :disp (+ nil-value
- (static-symbol-offset
- '*pseudo-atomic-interrupted*)
- (ash symbol-value-slot word-shift)
- (- other-pointer-lowtag)))
- 0)
- (inst jmp :eq ,label)
- ;; if PAI was set, interrupts were disabled at the same time
- ;; using the process signal mask.
- (inst break pending-interrupt-trap)
- (emit-label ,label))))
-
-
+ `(if *dynamic-extent*
+ (progn ,@forms)
+ (let ((,label (gen-label)))
+ ;; FIXME: The MAKE-EA noise should become a MACROLET macro
+ ;; or something. (perhaps SVLB, for static variable low
+ ;; byte)
+ (inst mov (make-ea :byte :disp (+ nil-value
+ (static-symbol-offset
+ '*pseudo-atomic-interrupted*)
+ (ash symbol-value-slot word-shift)
+ ;; FIXME: Use mask, not minus, to
+ ;; take out type bits.
+ (- other-pointer-lowtag)))
+ 0)
+ (inst mov (make-ea :byte :disp (+ nil-value
+ (static-symbol-offset
+ '*pseudo-atomic-atomic*)
+ (ash symbol-value-slot word-shift)
+ (- other-pointer-lowtag)))
+ (fixnumize 1))
+ ,@forms
+ (inst mov (make-ea :byte :disp (+ nil-value
+ (static-symbol-offset
+ '*pseudo-atomic-atomic*)
+ (ash symbol-value-slot word-shift)
+ (- other-pointer-lowtag)))
+ 0)
+ ;; KLUDGE: Is there any requirement for interrupts to be
+ ;; handled in order? It seems as though an interrupt coming
+ ;; in at this point will be executed before any pending
+ ;; interrupts. Or do incoming interrupts check to see
+ ;; whether any interrupts are pending? I wish I could find
+ ;; the documentation for pseudo-atomics.. -- WHN 19991130
+ (inst cmp (make-ea :byte
+ :disp (+ nil-value
+ (static-symbol-offset
+ '*pseudo-atomic-interrupted*)
+ (ash symbol-value-slot word-shift)
+ (- other-pointer-lowtag)))
+ 0)
+ (inst jmp :eq ,label)
+ ;; if PAI was set, interrupts were disabled at the same
+ ;; time using the process signal mask.
+ (inst break pending-interrupt-trap)
+ (emit-label ,label)))))
\f
;;;; indexed references