(:result-types positive-fixnum)
(:generator 6
(move eax type)
- (inst mov
- (make-ea :byte :base function :disp (- fun-pointer-lowtag))
- al-tn)
+ (storeb al-tn function 0 fun-pointer-lowtag)
(move result eax)))
(define-vop (get-header-data)
(define-source-transform %closure-fun (closure)
`(%simple-fun-self ,closure))
-(define-source-transform %funcallable-instance-fun (fin)
- `(%simple-fun-self ,fin))
-
(define-vop (%set-fun-self)
(:policy :fast-safe)
(:translate (setf %simple-fun-self))
(:temporary (:sc any-reg :from (:argument 0) :to :result) temp)
(:results (result :scs (descriptor-reg)))
(:generator 3
- (inst lea temp
- (make-ea :byte :base new-self
- :disp (- (ash simple-fun-code-offset word-shift)
- fun-pointer-lowtag)))
+ (inst lea temp (make-ea-for-object-slot new-self simple-fun-code-offset
+ fun-pointer-lowtag))
(storew temp function simple-fun-self-slot fun-pointer-lowtag)
(move result new-self)))
-
-;;; KLUDGE: This seems to be some kind of weird override of the way
-;;; that the objdef.lisp code would ordinarily set up the slot
-;;; accessor. It's inherited from CMU CL, and it works, and naively
-;;; deleting it seemed to cause problems, but it's not obvious why
-;;; it's done this way. Any ideas? -- WHN 2001-08-02
-(defknown ((setf %funcallable-instance-fun)) (function function) function
- (unsafe))
-;;; CMU CL comment:
-;;; We would have really liked to use a source-transform for this, but
-;;; they don't work with SETF functions.
-;;; FIXME: Can't we just use DEFSETF or something?
-(deftransform (setf %funcallable-instance-fun) ((value fin))
- '(setf (%simple-fun-self fin) value))
\f
;;;; other miscellaneous VOPs
(:args (count-vector :scs (descriptor-reg)))
(:info index)
(:generator 0
- (inst inc (make-ea :dword :base count-vector
- :disp (- (* (+ vector-data-offset index) n-word-bytes)
- other-pointer-lowtag)))))
+ (inst inc (make-ea-for-vector-data count-vector :offset index))))