0.8.15:

[sbcl.git] / src / pcl / boot.lisp

diff --git a/src/pcl/boot.lisp b/src/pcl/boot.lisp
index e89443f..f141b1d 100644 (file)
--- a/src/pcl/boot.lisp
+++ b/src/pcl/boot.lisp
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ bootstrapping.
           (compile-or-load-defgeneric ',fun-name))
          (load-defgeneric ',fun-name ',lambda-list ,@initargs)
         ,@(mapcar #'expand-method-definition methods)
-        #',fun-name))))
+        (fdefinition ',fun-name)))))
 
 (defun compile-or-load-defgeneric (fun-name)
   (proclaim-as-fun-name fun-name)
@@ -1252,6 +1252,14 @@ bootstrapping.
                    (setq next-method-p-p t)
                    form)
                   ((eq (car form) 'setq)
+                   ;; FIXME: this is possibly a little strong as
+                   ;; conditions go.  Ideally we would want to detect
+                   ;; which, if any, of the method parameters are
+                   ;; being set, and communicate that information to
+                   ;; e.g. SPLIT-DECLARATIONS.  However, the brute
+                   ;; force method doesn't really cost much; a little
+                   ;; loss of discrimination over IGNORED variables
+                   ;; should be all.  -- CSR, 2004-07-01
                    (setq setq-p t)
                    form)
                   ((and (eq (car form) 'function)