Fix typos in docstrings and function names.

[sbcl.git] / src / pcl / cache.lisp

diff --git a/src/pcl/cache.lisp b/src/pcl/cache.lisp
index 73c197b..1165922 100644 (file)
--- a/src/pcl/cache.lisp
+++ b/src/pcl/cache.lisp
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
 ;;;;
 ;;;; * Since the cache is used for memoization only we don't need to
 ;;;;   worry about which of simultaneous replacements (when expanding
-;;;;   the cache) takes place: the loosing one will have its work
+;;;;   the cache) takes place: the losing one will have its work
 ;;;;   redone later. This also allows us to drop entries when the
 ;;;;   cache is about to grow insanely huge.
 ;;;;
@@ -317,8 +317,6 @@
         ;; Make a smaller one, then
         (make-cache :key-count key-count :value value :size (ceiling size 2)))))
 
-(defconstant n-fixnum-bits #.(integer-length most-positive-fixnum))
-
 ;;;; Copies and expands the cache, dropping any invalidated or
 ;;;; incomplete lines.
 (defun copy-and-expand-cache (cache layouts value)
@@ -338,8 +336,8 @@
              (cache-mask copy) (compute-cache-mask length (cache-line-size cache))
              (cache-limit copy) (compute-limit (/ length (cache-line-size cache))))
        ;; First insert the new one -- if we don't do this first and
-       ;; the cache has reached it's maximum size we may end up
-       ;; looping in FILL-CACHE.
+       ;; the cache has reached its maximum size we may end up looping
+       ;; in FILL-CACHE.
        (unless (try-update-cache copy layouts value)
          (bug "Could not insert ~S:~S to supposedly empty ~S." layouts value copy))
        (map-cache (if drop-random-entries
@@ -350,25 +348,15 @@
                       ;; rut: add A causing B to drop, then add B
                       ;; causing A to drop... repeat ad nauseam,
                       ;; spending most of the time here instead of
-                      ;; doing real work. 50% because if we drop to
+                      ;; doing real work. 50% because if we drop too
                       ;; few we need to do this almost right away
-                      ;; again, and if we drop to many, we need to
+                      ;; again, and if we drop too many, we need to
                       ;; recompute more then we'd like.
                       ;; _Experimentally_ 50% seems to perform the
                       ;; best, but it would be nice to have a proper
                       ;; analysis...
-                      (flet ((random-fixnum ()
-                               (random (1+ most-positive-fixnum))))
-                        (let ((drops (random-fixnum))
-                              (drop-pos n-fixnum-bits))
-                          (declare (fixnum drops)
-                                   (type (integer 0 #.n-fixnum-bits) drop-pos))
-                          (lambda (layouts value)
-                            (when (logbitp (the unsigned-byte (decf drop-pos)) drops)
-                              (try-update-cache copy layouts value))
-                            (when (zerop drop-pos)
-                              (setf drops (random-fixnum)
-                                    drop-pos n-fixnum-bits)))))
+                      (randomly-punting-lambda (layouts value)
+                        (try-update-cache copy layouts value))
                       (lambda (layouts value)
                         (unless (try-update-cache copy layouts value)
                           ;; Didn't fit -- expand the cache, or drop