form)))
'dmc-test-return))
\f
+;;; DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION should, according to the description in 7.7,
+;;; allow you to do everything in the body forms yourself if you specify
+;;; exactly one method group whose qualifier-pattern is *
+;;;
+;;; The specific language is:
+;;; "The use of method group specifiers provides a convenient syntax to select
+;;; methods, to divide them among the possible roles, and to perform the
+;;; necessary error checking. It is possible to perform further filtering of
+;;; methods in the body forms by using normal list-processing operations and
+;;; the functions method-qualifiers and invalid-method-error. It is permissible
+;;; to use setq on the variables named in the method group specifiers and to
+;;; bind additional variables. It is also possible to bypass the method group
+;;; specifier mechanism and do everything in the body forms. This is
+;;; accomplished by writing a single method group with * as its only
+;;; qualifier-pattern; the variable is then bound to a list of all of the
+;;; applicable methods, in most-specific-first order."
+(define-method-combination wam-test-method-combination-a ()
+ ((all-methods *))
+ (do ((methods all-methods (rest methods))
+ (primary nil)
+ (around nil))
+ ((null methods)
+ (let ((primary (nreverse primary))
+ (around (nreverse around)))
+ (if primary
+ (let ((form (if (rest primary)
+ `(call-method ,(first primary) ,(rest primary))
+ `(call-method ,(first primary)))))
+ (if around
+ `(call-method ,(first around) (,@(rest around)
+ (make-method ,form)))
+ form))
+ `(make-method (error "No primary methods")))))
+ (let* ((method (first methods))
+ (qualifier (first (method-qualifiers method))))
+ (cond
+ ((equal :around qualifier)
+ (push method around))
+ ((null qualifier)
+ (push method primary))))))
+
+(defgeneric wam-test-mc-a (val)
+ (:method-combination wam-test-method-combination-a))
+(assert (raises-error? (wam-test-mc-a 13)))
+(defmethod wam-test-mc-a ((val number))
+ (+ val (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method) 0)))
+(assert (= (wam-test-mc-a 13) 13))
+(defmethod wam-test-mc-a :around ((val number))
+ (+ val (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method) 0)))
+(assert (= (wam-test-mc-a 13) 26))
+
+;;; DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION
+;;; When two methods are in the same method group and have the same
+;;; specializers, their sort order within the group may be ambiguous. Therefore,
+;;; we should throw an error when we have two methods in the same group with
+;;; the same specializers /as long as/ we have more than one method group
+;;; or our single method group qualifier-pattern is not *. This resolves the
+;;; apparent conflict with the above 'It is also possible to bypass' language.
+;;;
+;;; The language specifying this behavior is:
+;;; "Note that two methods with identical specializers, but with different
+;;; qualifiers, are not ordered by the algorithm described in Step 2 of the
+;;; method selection and combination process described in Section 7.6.6
+;;; (Method Selection and Combination). Normally the two methods play different
+;;; roles in the effective method because they have different qualifiers, and
+;;; no matter how they are ordered in the result of Step 2, the effective
+;;; method is the same. If the two methods play the same role and their order
+;;; matters, an error is signaled. This happens as part of the qualifier
+;;; pattern matching in define-method-combination."
+;;;
+;;; Note that the spec pretty much equates 'method group' and 'role'.
+;; First we ensure that it fails correctly when there is more than one
+;; method group
+(define-method-combination wam-test-method-combination-b ()
+ ((around (:around))
+ (primary * :required t))
+ (let ((form (if (rest primary)
+ `(call-method ,(first primary) ,(rest primary))
+ `(call-method ,(first primary)))))
+ (if around
+ `(call-method ,(first around) (,@(rest around)
+ (make-method ,form)))
+ form)))
+
+(defgeneric wam-test-mc-b (val)
+ (:method-combination wam-test-method-combination-b))
+(defmethod wam-test-mc-b ((val number))
+ (+ val (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method) 0)))
+(assert (= (wam-test-mc-b 13) 13))
+(defmethod wam-test-mc-b :around ((val number))
+ (+ val (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method) 0)))
+(assert (= (wam-test-mc-b 13) 26))
+(defmethod wam-test-mc-b :somethingelse ((val number))
+ (+ val (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method) 0)))
+(assert (raises-error? (wam-test-mc-b 13)))
+
+;;; now, ensure that it fails with a single group with a qualifier-pattern
+;;; that is not *
+(define-method-combination wam-test-method-combination-c ()
+ ((methods listp :required t))
+ (if (rest methods)
+ `(call-method ,(first methods) ,(rest methods))
+ `(call-method ,(first methods))))
+
+(defgeneric wam-test-mc-c (val)
+ (:method-combination wam-test-method-combination-c))
+(assert (raises-error? (wam-test-mc-c 13)))
+(defmethod wam-test-mc-c :foo ((val number))
+ (+ val (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method) 0)))
+(assert (= (wam-test-mc-c 13) 13))
+(defmethod wam-test-mc-c :bar ((val number))
+ (+ val (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method) 0)))
+(assert (raises-error? (wam-test-mc-c 13)))
+
;;; DEFMETHOD should signal an ERROR if an incompatible lambda list is
;;; given:
(defmethod incompatible-ll-test-1 (x) x)
(write-line "Break, you sucker!" *faa*)
'ok)
(assert (eq 'ok (faa (make-string-output-stream))))
+(defmethod fex ((x fixnum) (y fixnum))
+ (multiple-value-setq (x y) (values (/ x y) (/ y x)))
+ (list x y))
+(assert (equal (fex 5 3) '(5/3 3/5)))
;;; Bug reported by Zach Beane; incorrect return of (function
;;; ',fun-name) in defgeneric
(setf (find-class 'fr-alt) (find-class 'fr-super))
(assert (eq (find-class 'fr-alt) (find-class 'fr-super)))
+
+;;; ANSI Figure 4-8: all defined classes. Check that we can define
+;;; methods on all of these.
+(progn
+ (defgeneric method-for-defined-classes (x))
+ (dolist (c '(arithmetic-error
+ generic-function simple-error array hash-table
+ simple-type-error
+ bit-vector integer simple-warning
+ broadcast-stream list standard-class
+ built-in-class logical-pathname standard-generic-function
+ cell-error method standard-method
+ character method-combination standard-object
+ class null storage-condition
+ complex number stream
+ concatenated-stream package stream-error
+ condition package-error string
+ cons parse-error string-stream
+ control-error pathname structure-class
+ division-by-zero print-not-readable structure-object
+ echo-stream program-error style-warning
+ end-of-file random-state symbol
+ error ratio synonym-stream
+ file-error rational t
+ file-stream reader-error two-way-stream
+ float readtable type-error
+ floating-point-inexact real unbound-slot
+ floating-point-invalid-operation restart unbound-variable
+ floating-point-overflow sequence undefined-function
+ floating-point-underflow serious-condition vector
+ function simple-condition warning))
+ (eval `(defmethod method-for-defined-classes ((x ,c)) (princ x))))
+ (assert (string= (with-output-to-string (*standard-output*)
+ (method-for-defined-classes #\3))
+ "3")))
+
+
+\f
+;;; When class definition does not complete due to a bad accessor
+;;; name, do not cause an error when a new accessor name is provided
+;;; during class redefinition
+
+(defun existing-name (object)
+ (list object))
+
+(assert (raises-error? (defclass redefinition-of-accessor-class ()
+ ((slot :accessor existing-name)))))
+
+(defclass redefinition-of-accessor-class ()
+ ((slot :accessor new-name)))
+
+\f
+
+(load "package-ctor-bug.lisp")
+(assert (= (package-ctor-bug:test) 3))
+(delete-package "PACKAGE-CTOR-BUG")
+(load "package-ctor-bug.lisp")
+(assert (= (package-ctor-bug:test) 3))
+
+(deftype defined-type () 'integer)
+(assert (raises-error?
+ (defmethod method-on-defined-type ((x defined-type)) x)))
+(deftype defined-type-and-class () 'integer)
+(setf (find-class 'defined-type-and-class) (find-class 'integer))
+(defmethod method-on-defined-type-and-class ((x defined-type-and-class))
+ (1+ x))
+(assert (= (method-on-defined-type-and-class 3) 4))
+
+;; bug 281
+(let ((sb-pcl::*max-emf-precomputation-methods* 0))
+ (eval '(defgeneric bug-281 (x)
+ (:method-combination +)
+ (:method ((x symbol)) 1)
+ (:method + ((x number)) x)))
+ (assert (= 1 (bug-281 1)))
+ (assert (= 4.2 (bug-281 4.2)))
+ (multiple-value-bind (val err) (ignore-errors (bug-281 'symbol))
+ (assert (not val))
+ (assert (typep err 'error))))
+
;;;; success
(sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104)
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff