0.9.17.18: fix windows build, MAKE-ALIEN compiler note muffled fully

[sbcl.git] / tests / clos.impure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/clos.impure.lisp b/tests/clos.impure.lisp
index 27bbf45..0bef77f 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/clos.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/clos.impure.lisp
@@ -11,8 +11,6 @@
 ;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for
 ;;;; more information.
 
-(load "assertoid.lisp")
-
 (defpackage "CLOS-IMPURE"
   (:use "CL" "ASSERTOID" "TEST-UTIL"))
 (in-package "CLOS-IMPURE")
@@ -654,6 +652,7 @@
 (assert (= (bug222 t) 1))
 
 ;;; also, a test case to guard against bogus environment hacking:
+
 (eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
   (setq bug222-b 3))
 ;;; this should at the least compile:
@@ -664,8 +663,10 @@
 ;;; and it would be nice (though not specified by ANSI) if the answer
 ;;; were as follows:
 (let ((x (make-string-output-stream)))
-  ;; not specified by ANSI
-  (assert (= (bug222-b t x) 3))
+  (let ((value (bug222-b t x)))
+    ;; not specified by ANSI
+    #+#.(cl:if (cl:eq sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :compile) '(and) '(or))
+    (assert (= value 3)))
   ;; specified.
   (assert (char= (char (get-output-stream-string x) 0) #\1)))
 \f
@@ -1346,4 +1347,58 @@
 ;;; cache with more than one key, then failure ensues.
 (reinitialize-instance #'print-object)
 \f
+;;; bug in long-form method combination: if there's an applicable
+;;; method not part of any method group, we need to call
+;;; INVALID-METHOD-ERROR.  (MC27 test case from Bruno Haible)
+(define-method-combination mc27 ()
+  ((normal ())
+   (ignored (:ignore :unused)))
+  `(list 'result
+    ,@(mapcar #'(lambda (method) `(call-method ,method)) normal)))
+(defgeneric test-mc27 (x)
+  (:method-combination mc27)
+  (:method :ignore ((x number)) (/ 0)))
+(assert (raises-error? (test-mc27 7)))
+
+(define-method-combination mc27prime ()
+  ((normal ())
+   (ignored (:ignore)))
+  `(list 'result ,@(mapcar (lambda (m) `(call-method ,m)) normal)))
+(defgeneric test-mc27prime (x)
+  (:method-combination mc27prime)
+  (:method :ignore ((x number)) (/ 0)))
+(assert (equal '(result) (test-mc27prime 3)))
+(assert (raises-error? (test-mc27 t))) ; still no-applicable-method
+\f
+;;; more invalid wrappers.  This time for a long-standing bug in the
+;;; compiler's expansion for TYPEP on various class-like things, with
+;;; user-visible consequences.
+(defclass obsolete-again () ())
+(defvar *obsolete-again* (make-instance 'obsolete-again))
+(defvar *obsolete-again-hash* (sxhash *obsolete-again*))
+(make-instances-obsolete (find-class 'obsolete-again))
+(assert (not (streamp *obsolete-again*)))
+(make-instances-obsolete (find-class 'obsolete-again))
+(assert (= (sxhash *obsolete-again*) *obsolete-again-hash*))
+(compile (defun is-a-structure-object-p (x) (typep x 'structure-object)))
+(make-instances-obsolete (find-class 'obsolete-again))
+(assert (not (is-a-structure-object-p *obsolete-again*)))
+\f
+;;; overeager optimization of slot-valuish things
+(defclass listoid ()
+  ((caroid :initarg :caroid)
+   (cdroid :initarg :cdroid :initform nil)))
+(defmethod lengthoid ((x listoid))
+  (let ((result 0))
+    (loop until (null x)
+          do (incf result) (setq x (slot-value x 'cdroid)))
+    result))
+(with-test (:name ((:setq :method-parameter) slot-value))
+  (assert (= (lengthoid (make-instance 'listoid)) 1))
+  (assert (= (lengthoid
+              (make-instance 'listoid :cdroid
+                             (make-instance 'listoid :cdroid
+                                            (make-instance 'listoid))))
+             3)))
+\f
 ;;;; success