(assert (expect-error (defgeneric foo2 (x a &rest))))
(defgeneric foo3 (x &rest y))
(defmethod foo3 ((x t) &rest y) nil)
-(defmethod foo4 ((x t) &key y &rest z) nil)
+(defmethod foo4 ((x t) &rest z &key y) nil)
(defgeneric foo4 (x &rest z &key y))
(assert (expect-error (defgeneric foo5 (x &rest))))
(assert (expect-error (macroexpand-1 '(defmethod foo6 (x &rest)))))
(:default-initargs :a 1)
(:default-initargs :a 2)))
;; and also BUG 47d, fixed in sbcl-0.8alpha.0.26
- (assert-program-error (defgeneric if (x))))
+ (assert-program-error (defgeneric if (x)))
+ ;; DEFCLASS should detect an error if slot names aren't suitable as
+ ;; variable names:
+ (assert-program-error (defclass foo009 ()
+ ((:a :initarg :a))))
+ (assert-program-error (defclass foo010 ()
+ (("a" :initarg :a))))
+ (assert-program-error (defclass foo011 ()
+ ((#1a() :initarg :a))))
+ (assert-program-error (defclass foo012 ()
+ ((t :initarg :t))))
+ (assert-program-error (defclass foo013 () ("a")))
+ ;; specialized lambda lists have certain restrictions on ordering,
+ ;; repeating keywords, and the like:
+ (assert-program-error (defmethod foo014 ((foo t) &rest) nil))
+ (assert-program-error (defmethod foo015 ((foo t) &rest x y) nil))
+ (assert-program-error (defmethod foo016 ((foo t) &allow-other-keys) nil))
+ (assert-program-error (defmethod foo017 ((foo t)
+ &optional x &optional y) nil))
+ (assert-program-error (defmethod foo018 ((foo t) &rest x &rest y) nil))
+ (assert-program-error (defmethod foo019 ((foo t) &rest x &optional y) nil))
+ (assert-program-error (defmethod foo020 ((foo t) &key x &optional y) nil))
+ (assert-program-error (defmethod foo021 ((foo t) &key x &rest y) nil)))
\f
;;; DOCUMENTATION's argument-precedence-order wasn't being faithfully
;;; preserved through the bootstrap process until sbcl-0.7.8.39.
form)))
'dmc-test-return))
\f
-;;; DEFMETHOD should signal a PROGRAM-ERROR if an incompatible lambda
-;;; list is given:
+;;; DEFMETHOD should signal an ERROR if an incompatible lambda list is
+;;; given:
(defmethod incompatible-ll-test-1 (x) x)
-(multiple-value-bind (result error)
- (ignore-errors (defmethod incompatible-ll-test-1 (x y) y))
- (assert (null result))
- (assert (typep error 'program-error)))
-(multiple-value-bind (result error)
- (ignore-errors (defmethod incompatible-ll-test-1 (x &rest y) y))
- (assert (null result))
- (assert (typep error 'program-error)))
+(assert (raises-error? (defmethod incompatible-ll-test-1 (x y) y)))
+(assert (raises-error? (defmethod incompatible-ll-test-1 (x &rest y) y)))
;;; Sneakily using a bit of MOPness to check some consistency
(assert (= (length
(sb-pcl:generic-function-methods #'incompatible-ll-test-1)) 1))
(defmethod incompatible-ll-test-2 (x &key bar) bar)
-(multiple-value-bind (result error)
- (ignore-errors (defmethod incompatible-ll-test-2 (x) x))
- (assert (null result))
- (assert (typep error 'program-error)))
+(assert (raises-error? (defmethod incompatible-ll-test-2 (x) x)))
(defmethod incompatible-ll-test-2 (x &rest y) y)
(assert (= (length
(sb-pcl:generic-function-methods #'incompatible-ll-test-2)) 1))
'slot-value))
(assert (eq (funcall (lambda (x) (setf (slot-value x 'baz) 'baz))
(make-instance 'class-with-all-slots-missing))
- 'setf))
+ ;; SLOT-MISSING's value is specified to be ignored; we
+ ;; return NEW-VALUE.
+ 'baz))
\f
;;; we should be able to specialize on anything that names a class.
(defclass name-for-class () ())
(assert (= (slot-value x 'name) 1))
(assert (= (slot-value x 'cl-user::name) 2)))
\f
+;;; ALLOCATE-INSTANCE should work on structures, even if defined by
+;;; DEFSTRUCT (and not DEFCLASS :METACLASS STRUCTURE-CLASS).
+(defstruct allocatable-structure a)
+(assert (typep (allocate-instance (find-class 'allocatable-structure))
+ 'allocatable-structure))
+\f
+;;; Bug found by Paul Dietz when devising CPL tests: somewhat
+;;; amazingly, calls to CPL would work a couple of times, and then
+;;; start returning NIL. A fix was found (relating to the
+;;; applicability of constant-dfun optimization) by Gerd Moellmann.
+(defgeneric cpl (x)
+ (:method-combination list)
+ (:method list ((x broadcast-stream)) 'broadcast-stream)
+ (:method list ((x integer)) 'integer)
+ (:method list ((x number)) 'number)
+ (:method list ((x stream)) 'stream)
+ (:method list ((x structure-object)) 'structure-object))
+(assert (equal (cpl 0) '(integer number)))
+(assert (equal (cpl 0) '(integer number)))
+(assert (equal (cpl 0) '(integer number)))
+(assert (equal (cpl 0) '(integer number)))
+(assert (equal (cpl 0) '(integer number)))
+(assert (equal (cpl (make-broadcast-stream))
+ '(broadcast-stream stream structure-object)))
+(assert (equal (cpl (make-broadcast-stream))
+ '(broadcast-stream stream structure-object)))
+(assert (equal (cpl (make-broadcast-stream))
+ '(broadcast-stream stream structure-object)))
+\f
+;;; Bug in CALL-NEXT-METHOD: assignment to the method's formal
+;;; parameters shouldn't affect the arguments to the next method for a
+;;; no-argument call to CALL-NEXT-METHOD
+(defgeneric cnm-assignment (x)
+ (:method (x) x)
+ (:method ((x integer)) (setq x 3)
+ (list x (call-next-method) (call-next-method x))))
+(assert (equal (cnm-assignment 1) '(3 1 3)))
+\f
+;;; Bug reported by Istvan Marko 2003-07-09
+(let ((class-name (gentemp)))
+ (loop for i from 1 to 9
+ for slot-name = (intern (format nil "X~D" i))
+ for initarg-name = (intern (format nil "X~D" i) :keyword)
+ collect `(,slot-name :initarg ,initarg-name) into slot-descs
+ append `(,initarg-name (list 0)) into default-initargs
+ finally (eval `(defclass ,class-name ()
+ (,@slot-descs)
+ (:default-initargs ,@default-initargs))))
+ (let ((f (compile nil `(lambda () (make-instance ',class-name)))))
+ (assert (typep (funcall f) class-name))))
+
+;;; bug 262: DEFMETHOD failed on a generic function without a lambda
+;;; list
+(ensure-generic-function 'bug262)
+(defmethod bug262 (x y)
+ (list x y))
+(assert (equal (bug262 1 2) '(1 2)))
+
+;;; salex on #lisp 2003-10-13 reported that type declarations inside
+;;; WITH-SLOTS are too hairy to be checked
+(defun ensure-no-notes (form)
+ (handler-case (compile nil `(lambda () ,form))
+ (sb-ext:compiler-note (c)
+ ;; FIXME: it would be better to check specifically for the "type
+ ;; is too hairy" note
+ (error c))))
+(defvar *x*)
+(ensure-no-notes '(with-slots (a) *x*
+ (declare (integer a))
+ a))
+(ensure-no-notes '(with-slots (a) *x*
+ (declare (integer a))
+ (declare (notinline slot-value))
+ a))
+
+;;; from CLHS 7.6.5.1
+(defclass character-class () ((char :initarg :char)))
+(defclass picture-class () ((glyph :initarg :glyph)))
+(defclass character-picture-class (character-class picture-class) ())
+
+(defmethod width ((c character-class) &key font) font)
+(defmethod width ((p picture-class) &key pixel-size) pixel-size)
+
+(assert (raises-error?
+ (width (make-instance 'character-class :char #\Q)
+ :font 'baskerville :pixel-size 10)
+ program-error))
+(assert (raises-error?
+ (width (make-instance 'picture-class :glyph #\Q)
+ :font 'baskerville :pixel-size 10)
+ program-error))
+(assert (eq (width (make-instance 'character-picture-class :char #\Q)
+ :font 'baskerville :pixel-size 10)
+ 'baskerville))
+
+;;; class redefinition shouldn't give any warnings, in the usual case
+(defclass about-to-be-redefined () ((some-slot :accessor some-slot)))
+(handler-bind ((warning #'error))
+ (defclass about-to-be-redefined () ((some-slot :accessor some-slot))))
+
+;;; attempts to add accessorish methods to generic functions with more
+;;; complex lambda lists should fail
+(defgeneric accessoroid (object &key &allow-other-keys))
+(assert (raises-error?
+ (defclass accessoroid-class () ((slot :accessor accessoroid)))
+ program-error))
+
;;;; success
(sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104)
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff