(defmethod wiggle ((a struct-a))
(+ (struct-a-x a)
(struct-a-y a)))
-(defgeneric jiggle ((arg t)))
+(defgeneric jiggle (arg))
(defmethod jiggle ((a struct-a))
(- (struct-a-x a)
(struct-a-y a)))
;;; Compiling DEFGENERIC should prevent "undefined function" style
;;; warnings from code within the same file.
-(defgeneric gf-defined-in-this-file ((x number) (y number)))
+(defgeneric gf-defined-in-this-file (x y))
(defun function-using-gf-defined-in-this-file (x y n)
(unless (minusp n)
(gf-defined-in-this-file x y)))
(ignore-errors (progn ,@body))
(declare (ignore res))
(typep condition 'error))))
-
(assert (expect-error
(macroexpand-1
'(defmethod foo0 ((x t) &rest) nil))))
-
(assert (expect-error (defgeneric foo1 (x &rest))))
(assert (expect-error (defgeneric foo2 (x a &rest))))
-
(defgeneric foo3 (x &rest y))
(defmethod foo3 ((x t) &rest y) nil)
(defmethod foo4 ((x t) &key y &rest z) nil)
-(defgeneric foo4 (x &key y &rest z))
-
+(defgeneric foo4 (x &rest z &key y))
(assert (expect-error (defgeneric foo5 (x &rest))))
(assert (expect-error (macroexpand-1 '(defmethod foo6 (x &rest)))))
+;;; more lambda-list checking
+;;;
+;;; DEFGENERIC lambda lists are subject to various limitations, as per
+;;; section 3.4.2 of the ANSI spec. Since Alexey Dejneka's patch for
+;;; bug 191-b ca. sbcl-0.7.22, these limitations should be enforced.
+(labels ((coerce-to-boolean (x)
+ (if x t nil))
+ (%like-or-dislike (expr expected-failure-p)
+ (declare (type boolean expected-failure-p))
+ (format t "~&trying ~S~%" expr)
+ (multiple-value-bind (fun warnings-p failure-p)
+ (compile nil
+ `(lambda ()
+ ,expr))
+ (declare (ignore fun))
+ ;; In principle the constraint on WARNINGS-P below seems
+ ;; reasonable, but in practice we get warnings about
+ ;; undefined functions from the DEFGENERICs, apparently
+ ;; because the DECLAIMs which ordinarily prevent such
+ ;; warnings don't take effect because EVAL-WHEN
+ ;; (:COMPILE-TOPLEVEL) loses its magic when compiled
+ ;; within a LAMBDA. So maybe we can't test WARNINGS-P
+ ;; after all?
+ ;;(unless expected-failure-p
+ ;; (assert (not warnings-p)))
+ (assert (eq (coerce-to-boolean failure-p) expected-failure-p))))
+ (like (expr)
+ (%like-or-dislike expr nil))
+ (dislike (expr)
+ (%like-or-dislike expr t)))
+ ;; basic sanity
+ (dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-0 ("a" #p"b")))
+ (like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-1 ()))
+ (like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-2 (x)))
+ ;; forbidden default or supplied-p for &OPTIONAL or &KEY arguments
+ (dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-3 (x &optional (y 0))))
+ (like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-4 (x &optional y)))
+ (dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-5 (x y &key (z :z z-p))))
+ (like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-6 (x y &key z)))
+ (dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-7 (x &optional (y 0) &key z)))
+ (like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-8 (x &optional y &key z)))
+ (dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-9 (x &optional y &key (z :z))))
+ (like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-10 (x &optional y &key z)))
+ (dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-11 (&optional &key (k :k k-p))))
+ (like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-12 (&optional &key k)))
+ ;; forbidden &AUX
+ (dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-13 (x y z &optional a &aux g h)))
+ (like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-14 (x y z &optional a)))
+ (dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-bare-aux-1 (x &aux)))
+ (like '(defgeneric gf-for-ll-test-bare-aux-2 (x)))
+ ;; also can't use bogoDEFMETHODish type-qualifier-ish decorations
+ ;; on required arguments
+ (dislike '(defgeneric gf-for-11-test-15 ((arg t))))
+ (like '(defgeneric gf-for-11-test-16 (arg))))
+
;;; structure-class tests setup
(defclass structure-class-foo1 () () (:metaclass cl:structure-class))
(defclass structure-class-foo2 (structure-class-foo1)
;;; Until Pierre Mai's patch (sbcl-devel 2002-06-18, merged in
;;; sbcl-0.7.4.39) the :MOST-SPECIFIC-LAST option had no effect.
-(defgeneric bug180 ((x t))
+(defgeneric bug180 (x)
(:method-combination list :most-specific-last))
(defmethod bug180 list ((x number))
'number)
(assert (eq (ffin *cod*) 'almost-triang-fin))
(assert (equalp #((:before cod) (cod)) *clos-dispatch-side-fx*))
\f
+;;; Until sbcl-0.7.6.21, the long form of DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION
+;;; ignored its options; Gerd Moellmann found and fixed the problem
+;;; for cmucl (cmucl-imp 2002-06-18).
+(define-method-combination test-mc (x)
+ ;; X above being a method-group-specifier
+ ((primary () :required t))
+ `(call-method ,(first primary)))
+
+(defgeneric gf (obj)
+ (:method-combination test-mc 1))
+
+(defmethod gf (obj)
+ obj)
+\f
+;;; Until sbcl-0.7.7.20, some conditions weren't being signalled, and
+;;; some others were of the wrong type:
+(macrolet ((assert-program-error (form)
+ `(multiple-value-bind (value error)
+ (ignore-errors ,form)
+ (assert (null value))
+ (assert (typep error 'program-error)))))
+ (assert-program-error (defclass foo001 () (a b a)))
+ (assert-program-error (defclass foo002 ()
+ (a b)
+ (:default-initargs x 'a x 'b)))
+ (assert-program-error (defclass foo003 ()
+ ((a :allocation :class :allocation :class))))
+ (assert-program-error (defclass foo004 ()
+ ((a :silly t))))
+ ;; and some more, found by Wolfhard Buss and fixed for cmucl by Gerd
+ ;; Moellmann in 0.7.8.x:
+ (assert-program-error (progn
+ (defmethod odd-key-args-checking (&key (key 42)) key)
+ (odd-key-args-checking 3)))
+ (assert (= (odd-key-args-checking) 42))
+ (assert (eq (odd-key-args-checking :key t) t)))
+\f
+;;; DOCUMENTATION's argument-precedence-order wasn't being faithfully
+;;; preserved through the bootstrap process until sbcl-0.7.8.39.
+;;; (thanks to Gerd Moellmann)
+(let ((answer (documentation '+ 'function)))
+ (assert (stringp answer))
+ (defmethod documentation ((x (eql '+)) y) "WRONG")
+ (assert (string= (documentation '+ 'function) answer)))
+\f
;;;; success
(sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104)
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff