;;; bug 194, fixed in part by APD "more strict type checking" patch
;;; (sbcl-devel 2002-08-07)
(progn
- #+nil ; FIXME: still broken in 0.7.7.19 (after patch)
(multiple-value-bind (result error)
(ignore-errors (multiple-value-prog1 (progn (the real '(1 2 3)))))
(assert (null result))
(assert (typep error 'type-error)))
- #+nil ; FIXME: still broken in 0.7.7.19 (after patch)
(multiple-value-bind (result error)
(ignore-errors (the real '(1 2 3)))
(assert (null result))
(assert (typep error 'type-error))))
+
+(defun bug194d ()
+ (null (ignore-errors
+ (let ((arg1 1)
+ (arg2 (identity (the real #(1 2 3)))))
+ (if (< arg1 arg2) arg1 arg2)))))
+(assert (eq (bug194d) t))
+
\f
;;; BUG 48a. and b. (symbol-macrolet handling), fixed by Eric Marsden
;;; and Raymond Toy for CMUCL, fix ported for sbcl-0.7.6.18.
*standard-input*)))
(assert failure-p)
(assert (raises-error? (funcall function) program-error)))
-#||
-BUG 48c, not yet fixed:
(multiple-value-bind (function warnings-p failure-p)
(compile nil '(lambda () (symbol-macrolet ((s nil)) (declare (special s)) s)))
(assert failure-p)
(assert (raises-error? (funcall function) program-error)))
-||#
\f
;;; bug 120a: Turned out to be constraining code looking like (if foo
;;; <X> <X>) where <X> was optimized by the compiler to be the exact
(declare (ignore result))
(assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
-;;; bug 110: the compiler flushed the argument type test and the default
-;;; case in the cond.
-
-(defun bug110 (x)
- (declare (optimize (safety 2) (speed 3)))
- (declare (type (or string stream) x))
- (cond ((typep x 'string) 'string)
- ((typep x 'stream) 'stream)
- (t
- 'none)))
-
-(multiple-value-bind (result condition)
- (ignore-errors (bug110 0))
- (declare (ignore result))
- (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
+;;;; bug 110: the compiler flushed the argument type test and the default
+;;;; case in the cond.
+;
+;(locally (declare (optimize (safety 3) (speed 2)))
+; (defun bug110 (x)
+; (declare (optimize (safety 2) (speed 3)))
+; (declare (type (or string stream) x))
+; (cond ((typep x 'string) 'string)
+; ((typep x 'stream) 'stream)
+; (t
+; 'none))))
+;
+;(multiple-value-bind (result condition)
+; (ignore-errors (bug110 0))
+; (declare (ignore result))
+; (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
;;; bug 202: the compiler failed to compile a function, which derived
;;; type contradicted declared.
`(lambda (f)
(declare (optimize (speed 2) (safety ,policy1)))
(multiple-value-list
- (the (values (integer 2 3) t)
+ (the (values (integer 2 3) t &optional)
(locally (declare (optimize (safety ,policy2)))
- (the (values t (single-float 2f0 3f0))
+ (the (values t (single-float 2f0 3f0) &optional)
(funcall f)))))))
(lambda () (values x y)))
(type-error (error)
(assert (equal (check-embedded-thes 0 1 :a 3.5f0) '(:a 3.5f0)))
(assert (typep (check-embedded-thes 0 1 2 2.5d0) 'type-error))
-#+nil
(assert (equal (check-embedded-thes 3 0 2 :a) '(2 :a)))
(assert (typep (check-embedded-thes 3 0 4 2.5f0) 'type-error))
(assert (equal (check-embedded-thes 3 3 2 2.5f0) '(2 2.5f0)))
(assert (typep (check-embedded-thes 3 3 0 2.5f0) 'type-error))
(assert (typep (check-embedded-thes 3 3 2 3.5f0) 'type-error))
-
\f
;;; INLINE inside MACROLET
(declaim (inline to-be-inlined))
;;; COERCE got its own DEFOPTIMIZER which has to reimplement most of
;;; SPECIFIER-TYPE-NTH-ARG. For a while, an illegal type would throw
;;; you into the debugger on compilation.
-(defun coerce-defopt (x)
+(defun coerce-defopt1 (x)
;; illegal, but should be compilable.
(coerce x '(values t)))
-(assert (null (ignore-errors (coerce-defopt 3))))
+(defun coerce-defopt2 (x)
+ ;; illegal, but should be compilable.
+ (coerce x '(values t &optional)))
+(assert (null (ignore-errors (coerce-defopt1 3))))
+(assert (null (ignore-errors (coerce-defopt2 3))))
\f
;;; Oops. In part of the (CATCH ..) implementation of DEBUG-RETURN,
;;; it was possible to confuse the type deriver of the compiler
(declare (type (vector (unsigned-byte 8)) x))
(setq *y* (the (unsigned-byte 8) (aref x 4))))
\f
+;;; FUNCTION-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION should return something that's COMPILE
+;;; can understand. Here's a simple test for that on a function
+;;; that's likely to return a hairier list than just a lambda:
+(macrolet ((def (fn) `(progn
+ (declaim (inline ,fn))
+ (defun ,fn (x) (1+ x)))))
+ (def bug228))
+(let ((x (function-lambda-expression #'bug228)))
+ (when x
+ (assert (= (funcall (compile nil x) 1) 2))))
+
+;;;
+(defun bug192b (i)
+ (dotimes (j i)
+ (declare (type (mod 4) i))
+ (unless (< i 5)
+ (print j))))
+(assert (raises-error? (bug192b 6) type-error))
+
+(defun bug192c (x y)
+ (locally (declare (type fixnum x y))
+ (+ x (* 2 y))))
+(assert (raises-error? (bug192c 1.1 2) type-error))
+
+(assert (raises-error? (progn (the real (list 1)) t) type-error))
+
+(defun bug236 (a f)
+ (declare (optimize (speed 2) (safety 0)))
+ (+ 1d0
+ (the double-float
+ (multiple-value-prog1
+ (svref a 0)
+ (unless f (return-from bug236 0))))))
+(assert (eql (bug236 #(4) nil) 0))
+
+;;; Bug reported by reported by rif on c.l.l 2003-03-05
+(defun test-type-of-special-1 (x)
+ (declare (special x)
+ (fixnum x)
+ (optimize (safety 3)))
+ (list x))
+(defun test-type-of-special-2 (x)
+ (declare (special x)
+ (fixnum x)
+ (optimize (safety 3)))
+ (list x (setq x (/ x 2)) x))
+(assert (raises-error? (test-type-of-special-1 3/2) type-error))
+(assert (raises-error? (test-type-of-special-2 3) type-error))
+(assert (equal (test-type-of-special-2 8) '(8 4 4)))
+
+;;; bug which existed in 0.8alpha.0.4 for several milliseconds before
+;;; APD fixed it in 0.8alpha.0.5
+(defun frob8alpha04 (x y)
+ (+ x y))
+(defun baz8alpha04 (this kids)
+ (flet ((n-i (&rest rest)
+ ;; Removing the #+NIL here makes the bug go away.
+ #+nil (format t "~&in N-I REST=~S~%" rest)
+ (apply #'frob8alpha04 this rest)))
+ (n-i kids)))
+;;; failed in 0.8alpha.0.4 with "The value 13 is not of type LIST."
+(assert (= (baz8alpha04 12 13) 25))
+
+;;; evaluation order in structure slot writers
+(defstruct sswo
+ a b)
+(let* ((i 0)
+ (s (make-sswo :a (incf i) :b (incf i)))
+ (l (list s :v)))
+ (assert (= (sswo-a s) 1))
+ (assert (= (sswo-b s) 2))
+ (setf (sswo-a (pop l)) (pop l))
+ (assert (eq l nil))
+ (assert (eq (sswo-a s) :v)))
+
+(defun bug249 (x)
+ (flet ((bar (y)
+ (declare (fixnum y))
+ (incf x)))
+ (list (bar x) (bar x) (bar x))))
+
+(assert (raises-error? (bug249 1.0) type-error))
+
+;;; bug reported by ohler on #lisp 2003-07-10
+(defun bug-ohler-2003-07-10 (a b)
+ (declare (optimize (speed 0) (safety 3) (space 0)
+ (debug 1) (compilation-speed 0)))
+ (adjoin a b))
+
+;;; bug reported by Doug McNaught on sbcl-devel 2003-09-14:
+;;; COMPILE-FILE did not bind *READTABLE*
+(let* ((source "bug-doug-mcnaught-20030914.lisp")
+ (fasl (compile-file-pathname source)))
+ (labels ((check ()
+ (assert (null (get-macro-character #\]))))
+ (full-check ()
+ (check)
+ (assert (typep *bug-doug-mcnaught-20030914*
+ '(simple-array (unsigned-byte 4) (*))))
+ (assert (equalp *bug-doug-mcnaught-20030914* #(1 2 3)))
+ (makunbound '*bug-doug-mcnaught-20030914*)))
+ (compile-file source)
+ (check)
+ (load fasl)
+ (full-check)
+ (load source)
+ (full-check)
+ (delete-file fasl)))
+\f
+(defun expt-derive-type-bug (a b)
+ (unless (< a b)
+ (truncate (expt a b))))
+(assert (equal (multiple-value-list (expt-derive-type-bug 1 1))
+ '(1 0)))
+
+;;; Problems with type checking in functions with EXPLICIT-CHECK
+;;; attribute (reported by Peter Graves)
+(loop for (fun . args) in '((= a) (/= a)
+ (< a) (<= a) (> a) (>= a))
+ do (assert (raises-error? (apply fun args) type-error)))
+
+(defclass broken-input-stream (sb-gray:fundamental-input-stream) ())
+(defmethod sb-gray:stream-read-char ((stream broken-input-stream))
+ (throw 'break :broken))
+(assert (eql (block return
+ (handler-case
+ (catch 'break
+ (funcall (eval ''peek-char)
+ 1 (make-instance 'broken-input-stream))
+ :test-broken)
+ (type-error (c)
+ (return-from return :good))))
+ :good))
+\f
+;;;; MUFFLE-CONDITIONS test (corresponds to the test in the manual)
+(defvar *compiler-note-count* 0)
+(handler-bind ((sb-ext:compiler-note (lambda (c)
+ (declare (ignore c))
+ (incf *compiler-note-count*))))
+ (let ((fun
+ (compile nil
+ '(lambda (x)
+ (declare (optimize speed) (fixnum x))
+ (declare (sb-ext:muffle-conditions sb-ext:compiler-note))
+ (values (* x 5) ; no compiler note from this
+ (locally
+ (declare (sb-ext:unmuffle-conditions sb-ext:compiler-note))
+ ;; this one gives a compiler note
+ (* x -5)))))))
+ (assert (= *compiler-note-count* 1))
+ (assert (equal (multiple-value-list (funcall fun 1)) '(5 -5)))))
+\f
;;;; tests not in the problem domain, but of the consistency of the
;;;; compiler machinery itself
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff