0.7.13.11:

[sbcl.git] / tests / compiler.impure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/compiler.impure.lisp b/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
index dbb2420..9a2aed6 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
@@ -404,21 +404,22 @@ BUG 48c, not yet fixed:
   (declare (ignore result))
   (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
 
-;;; bug 110: the compiler flushed the argument type test and the default
-;;; case in the cond.
-
-(defun bug110 (x)
-  (declare (optimize (safety 2) (speed 3)))
-  (declare (type (or string stream) x))
-  (cond ((typep x 'string) 'string)
-        ((typep x 'stream) 'stream)
-        (t
-         'none)))
-
-(multiple-value-bind (result condition)
-    (ignore-errors (bug110 0))
-  (declare (ignore result))
-  (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
+;;;; bug 110: the compiler flushed the argument type test and the default
+;;;; case in the cond.
+;
+;(locally (declare (optimize (safety 3) (speed 2)))
+;  (defun bug110 (x)
+;    (declare (optimize (safety 2) (speed 3)))
+;    (declare (type (or string stream) x))
+;    (cond ((typep x 'string) 'string)
+;          ((typep x 'stream) 'stream)
+;          (t
+;           'none))))
+;
+;(multiple-value-bind (result condition)
+;    (ignore-errors (bug110 0))
+;  (declare (ignore result))
+;  (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
 
 ;;; bug 202: the compiler failed to compile a function, which derived
 ;;; type contradicted declared.
@@ -751,6 +752,17 @@ BUG 48c, not yet fixed:
   (declare (type (vector (unsigned-byte 8)) x))
   (setq *y* (the (unsigned-byte 8) (aref x 4))))
 \f
+;;; FUNCTION-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION should return something that's COMPILE
+;;; can understand.  Here's a simple test for that on a function
+;;; that's likely to return a hairier list than just a lambda:
+(macrolet ((def (fn) `(progn
+                      (declaim (inline ,fn))
+                      (defun ,fn (x) (1+ x)))))
+  (def bug228))
+(let ((x (function-lambda-expression #'bug228)))
+  (when x
+    (assert (= (funcall (compile nil x) 1) 2))))
+
 ;;;; tests not in the problem domain, but of the consistency of the
 ;;;; compiler machinery itself