0.pre8.16:

[sbcl.git] / tests / compiler.impure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/compiler.impure.lisp b/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
index 37b12fc..d904439 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
@@ -404,21 +404,22 @@ BUG 48c, not yet fixed:
   (declare (ignore result))
   (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
 
-;;; bug 110: the compiler flushed the argument type test and the default
-;;; case in the cond.
-
-(defun bug110 (x)
-  (declare (optimize (safety 2) (speed 3)))
-  (declare (type (or string stream) x))
-  (cond ((typep x 'string) 'string)
-        ((typep x 'stream) 'stream)
-        (t
-         'none)))
-
-(multiple-value-bind (result condition)
-    (ignore-errors (bug110 0))
-  (declare (ignore result))
-  (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
+;;;; bug 110: the compiler flushed the argument type test and the default
+;;;; case in the cond.
+;
+;(locally (declare (optimize (safety 3) (speed 2)))
+;  (defun bug110 (x)
+;    (declare (optimize (safety 2) (speed 3)))
+;    (declare (type (or string stream) x))
+;    (cond ((typep x 'string) 'string)
+;          ((typep x 'stream) 'stream)
+;          (t
+;           'none))))
+;
+;(multiple-value-bind (result condition)
+;    (ignore-errors (bug110 0))
+;  (declare (ignore result))
+;  (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
 
 ;;; bug 202: the compiler failed to compile a function, which derived
 ;;; type contradicted declared.
@@ -702,7 +703,81 @@ BUG 48c, not yet fixed:
 (do-optimizations
   (compile nil '(lambda (x) (let ((y (error ""))) (list x y)))))
 
+;;; bug 223: invalid moving of global function name referencing
+(defun bug223-int (n)
+  `(int ,n))
+
+(defun bug223-wrap ()
+  (let ((old #'bug223-int))
+    (setf (fdefinition 'bug223-int)
+          (lambda (n)
+            (assert (> n 0))
+            `(ext ,@(funcall old (1- n)))))))
+(compile 'bug223-wrap)
+
+(assert (equal (bug223-int 4) '(int 4)))
+(bug223-wrap)
+(assert (equal (bug223-int 4) '(ext int 3)))
+(bug223-wrap)
+(assert (equal (bug223-int 4) '(ext ext int 2)))
 \f
+;;; COERCE got its own DEFOPTIMIZER which has to reimplement most of
+;;; SPECIFIER-TYPE-NTH-ARG.  For a while, an illegal type would throw
+;;; you into the debugger on compilation.
+(defun coerce-defopt (x)
+  ;; illegal, but should be compilable.
+  (coerce x '(values t)))
+(assert (null (ignore-errors (coerce-defopt 3))))
+\f
+;;; Oops.  In part of the (CATCH ..) implementation of DEBUG-RETURN,
+;;; it was possible to confuse the type deriver of the compiler
+;;; sufficiently that compiler invariants were broken (explained by
+;;; APD sbcl-devel 2003-01-11).
+
+;;; WHN's original report
+(defun debug-return-catch-break1 ()
+  (with-open-file (s "/tmp/foo"
+                    :direction :output
+                    :element-type (list
+                                   'signed-byte
+                                   (1+
+                                    (integer-length most-positive-fixnum))))
+    (read-byte s)
+    (read-byte s)
+    (read-byte s)
+    (read-byte s)))
+
+;;; APD's simplified test case
+(defun debug-return-catch-break2 (x)
+  (declare (type (vector (unsigned-byte 8)) x))
+  (setq *y* (the (unsigned-byte 8) (aref x 4))))
+\f
+;;; FUNCTION-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION should return something that's COMPILE
+;;; can understand.  Here's a simple test for that on a function
+;;; that's likely to return a hairier list than just a lambda:
+(macrolet ((def (fn) `(progn
+                      (declaim (inline ,fn))
+                      (defun ,fn (x) (1+ x)))))
+  (def bug228))
+(let ((x (function-lambda-expression #'bug228)))
+  (when x
+    (assert (= (funcall (compile nil x) 1) 2))))
+
+;;; Bug reported by reported by rif on c.l.l 2003-03-05
+(defun test-type-of-special-1 (x)
+  (declare (special x)
+           (fixnum x)
+           (optimize (safety 3)))
+  (list x))
+(defun test-type-of-special-2 (x)
+  (declare (special x)
+           (fixnum x)
+           (optimize (safety 3)))
+  (list x (setq x (/ x 2)) x))
+(assert (raises-error? (test-type-of-special-1 3/2) type-error))
+(assert (raises-error? (test-type-of-special-2 3) type-error))
+(assert (equal (test-type-of-special-2 8) '(8 4 4)))
+
 ;;;; tests not in the problem domain, but of the consistency of the
 ;;;; compiler machinery itself