0.7.8.5:

[sbcl.git] / tests / compiler.impure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/compiler.impure.lisp b/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
index 72013e8..d9ea3fb 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
@@ -336,6 +336,90 @@ BUG 48c, not yet fixed:
   (if x t (if y t (dont-constrain-if-too-much x y))))
 
 (assert (null (dont-constrain-if-too-much-aux nil nil)))  
+
+;;; TYPE-ERROR confusion ca. sbcl-0.7.7.24, reported and fixed by
+;;; APD sbcl-devel 2002-09-14
+(defun exercise-0-7-7-24-bug (x)
+  (declare (integer x))
+  (let (y)
+    (setf y (the single-float (if (> x 0) x 3f0)))
+    (list y y)))
+(multiple-value-bind (v e) (ignore-errors (exercise-0-7-7-24-bug 4))
+  (assert (null v))
+  (assert (typep e 'type-error)))
+(assert (equal (exercise-0-7-7-24-bug -4) '(3f0 3f0)))
+
+;;; non-intersecting type declarations were DWIMing in a confusing
+;;; fashion until sbcl-0.7.7.28, when APD reported and fixed the
+;;; problem.
+(defun non-intersecting-the (x)
+  (let (y)
+    (setf y (the single-float (the integer x)))
+    (list y y)))
+
+(raises-error? (foo 3) type-error)
+(raises-error? (foo 3f0) type-error)
+
+;;; until 0.8.2 SBCL did not check THEs in arguments
+(defun the-in-arguments-aux (x)
+  x)
+(defun the-in-arguments-1 (x)
+  (list x (the-in-arguments-aux (the (single-float 0s0) x))))
+(defun the-in-arguments-2 (x)
+  (list x (the-in-arguments-aux (the single-float x))))
+
+(multiple-value-bind (result condition)
+    (ignore-errors (the-in-arguments-1 1))
+  (assert (null result))
+  (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
+(multiple-value-bind (result condition)
+    (ignore-errors (the-in-arguments-2 1))
+  (assert (null result))
+  (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
+
+;;; bug 153: a hole in a structure slot type checking
+(declaim (optimize safety))
+(defstruct foo153
+  (bla 0 :type fixnum))
+(defun bug153-1 ()
+  (let ((foo (make-foo153)))
+    (setf (foo153-bla foo) '(1 . 1))
+    (format t "Is ~a of type ~a a cons? => ~a~%"
+            (foo153-bla foo)
+            (type-of (foo153-bla foo))
+            (consp (foo153-bla foo)))))
+(defun bug153-2 (x)
+  (let ((foo (make-foo153)))
+    (setf (foo153-bla foo) x)
+    (format t "Is ~a of type ~a a cons? => ~a~%"
+            (foo153-bla foo)
+            (type-of (foo153-bla foo))
+            (consp (foo153-bla foo)))))
+
+(multiple-value-bind (result condition)
+    (ignore-errors (bug153-1))
+  (declare (ignore result))
+  (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
+(multiple-value-bind (result condition)
+    (ignore-errors (bug153-2 '(1 . 1)))
+  (declare (ignore result))
+  (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
+
+;;; bug 110: the compiler flushed the argument type test and the default
+;;; case in the cond.
+
+(defun bug110 (x)
+  (declare (optimize (safety 2) (speed 3)))
+  (declare (type (or string stream) x))
+  (cond ((typep x 'string) 'string)
+        ((typep x 'stream) 'stream)
+        (t
+         'none)))
+
+(multiple-value-bind (result condition)
+    (ignore-errors (bug110 0))
+  (declare (ignore result))
+  (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
 \f
 ;;;; tests not in the problem domain, but of the consistency of the
 ;;;; compiler machinery itself