;; A5 value and is very, very disappointed in you. (But it doesn't
;; signal BUG any more.)
(assert failure-p))
+
+;;; On the SPARC, there was an erroneous definition of some VOPs used
+;;; to compile LOGANDs, which would lead to compilation of the
+;;; following function giving rise to a compile-time error (bug
+;;; spotted and fixed by Raymond Toy for CMUCL)
+(defun logand-sparc-bogons (a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8 a9 a10)
+ (declare (type (unsigned-byte 32) a0)
+ (type (signed-byte 32) a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8 a9 a10)
+ ;; to ensure that the call is a candidate for
+ ;; transformation
+ (optimize (speed 3) (safety 0) (compilation-speed 0) (debug 0)))
+ (values
+ ;; the call that fails compilation
+ (logand a0 a10)
+ ;; a call to prevent the other arguments from being optimized away
+ (logand a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8 a9)))
\f
;;;; tests not in the problem domain, but of the consistency of the
;;;; compiler machinery itself