0.8alpha.0.9:

[sbcl.git] / tests / compiler.impure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/compiler.impure.lisp b/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
index dbb2420..f36f860 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
@@ -404,21 +404,22 @@ BUG 48c, not yet fixed:
   (declare (ignore result))
   (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
 
-;;; bug 110: the compiler flushed the argument type test and the default
-;;; case in the cond.
-
-(defun bug110 (x)
-  (declare (optimize (safety 2) (speed 3)))
-  (declare (type (or string stream) x))
-  (cond ((typep x 'string) 'string)
-        ((typep x 'stream) 'stream)
-        (t
-         'none)))
-
-(multiple-value-bind (result condition)
-    (ignore-errors (bug110 0))
-  (declare (ignore result))
-  (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
+;;;; bug 110: the compiler flushed the argument type test and the default
+;;;; case in the cond.
+;
+;(locally (declare (optimize (safety 3) (speed 2)))
+;  (defun bug110 (x)
+;    (declare (optimize (safety 2) (speed 3)))
+;    (declare (type (or string stream) x))
+;    (cond ((typep x 'string) 'string)
+;          ((typep x 'stream) 'stream)
+;          (t
+;           'none))))
+;
+;(multiple-value-bind (result condition)
+;    (ignore-errors (bug110 0))
+;  (declare (ignore result))
+;  (assert (typep condition 'type-error)))
 
 ;;; bug 202: the compiler failed to compile a function, which derived
 ;;; type contradicted declared.
@@ -751,6 +752,45 @@ BUG 48c, not yet fixed:
   (declare (type (vector (unsigned-byte 8)) x))
   (setq *y* (the (unsigned-byte 8) (aref x 4))))
 \f
+;;; FUNCTION-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION should return something that's COMPILE
+;;; can understand.  Here's a simple test for that on a function
+;;; that's likely to return a hairier list than just a lambda:
+(macrolet ((def (fn) `(progn
+                      (declaim (inline ,fn))
+                      (defun ,fn (x) (1+ x)))))
+  (def bug228))
+(let ((x (function-lambda-expression #'bug228)))
+  (when x
+    (assert (= (funcall (compile nil x) 1) 2))))
+
+;;; Bug reported by reported by rif on c.l.l 2003-03-05
+(defun test-type-of-special-1 (x)
+  (declare (special x)
+           (fixnum x)
+           (optimize (safety 3)))
+  (list x))
+(defun test-type-of-special-2 (x)
+  (declare (special x)
+           (fixnum x)
+           (optimize (safety 3)))
+  (list x (setq x (/ x 2)) x))
+(assert (raises-error? (test-type-of-special-1 3/2) type-error))
+(assert (raises-error? (test-type-of-special-2 3) type-error))
+(assert (equal (test-type-of-special-2 8) '(8 4 4)))
+
+;;; bug which existed in 0.8alpha.0.4 for several milliseconds before
+;;; APD fixed it in 0.8alpha.0.5
+(defun frob8alpha04 (x y)
+  (+ x y))
+(defun baz8alpha04 (this kids)
+  (flet ((n-i (&rest rest)
+          ;; Removing the #+NIL here makes the bug go away.
+          #+nil (format t "~&in N-I REST=~S~%" rest)
+          (apply #'frob8alpha04 this rest)))
+    (n-i kids)))
+;;; failed in 0.8alpha.0.4 with "The value 13 is not of type LIST."
+(assert (= (baz8alpha04 12 13) 25))
+\f
 ;;;; tests not in the problem domain, but of the consistency of the
 ;;;; compiler machinery itself