0.8.10.36:

[sbcl.git] / tests / compiler.impure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/compiler.impure.lisp b/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
index 9435118..f94e582 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/compiler.impure.lisp
@@ -839,6 +839,85 @@
     (list (bar x) (bar x) (bar x))))
 
 (assert (raises-error? (bug249 1.0) type-error))
+
+;;; bug reported by ohler on #lisp 2003-07-10
+(defun bug-ohler-2003-07-10 (a b)
+  (declare (optimize (speed 0) (safety 3) (space 0)
+                     (debug 1) (compilation-speed 0)))
+  (adjoin a b))
+
+;;; bug reported by Doug McNaught on sbcl-devel 2003-09-14:
+;;; COMPILE-FILE did not bind *READTABLE*
+(let* ((source "bug-doug-mcnaught-20030914.lisp")
+       (fasl (compile-file-pathname source)))
+  (labels ((check ()
+             (assert (null (get-macro-character #\]))))
+           (full-check ()
+             (check)
+             (assert (typep *bug-doug-mcnaught-20030914*
+                            '(simple-array (unsigned-byte 4) (*))))
+             (assert (equalp *bug-doug-mcnaught-20030914* #(1 2 3)))
+             (makunbound '*bug-doug-mcnaught-20030914*)))
+    (compile-file source)
+    (check)
+    (load fasl)
+    (full-check)
+    (load source)
+    (full-check)
+    (delete-file fasl)))
+\f
+(defun expt-derive-type-bug (a b)
+  (unless (< a b)
+    (truncate (expt a b))))
+(assert (equal (multiple-value-list (expt-derive-type-bug 1 1))
+              '(1 0)))
+
+;;; Problems with type checking in functions with EXPLICIT-CHECK
+;;; attribute (reported by Peter Graves)
+(loop for (fun . args) in '((= a) (/= a)
+                            (< a) (<= a) (> a) (>= a))
+      do (assert (raises-error? (apply fun args) type-error)))
+
+(defclass broken-input-stream (sb-gray:fundamental-input-stream) ())
+(defmethod sb-gray:stream-read-char ((stream broken-input-stream))
+  (throw 'break :broken))
+(assert (eql (block return
+               (handler-case
+                   (catch 'break
+                     (funcall (eval ''peek-char)
+                              1 (make-instance 'broken-input-stream))
+                     :test-broken)
+                 (type-error (c)
+                   (return-from return :good))))
+             :good))
+\f
+;;;; MUFFLE-CONDITIONS test (corresponds to the test in the manual)
+(defvar *compiler-note-count* 0)
+#-alpha ; FIXME: make a better test!
+(handler-bind ((sb-ext:compiler-note (lambda (c)
+                                      (declare (ignore c))
+                                      (incf *compiler-note-count*))))
+  (let ((fun
+        (compile nil
+                 '(lambda (x)
+                   (declare (optimize speed) (fixnum x))
+                   (declare (sb-ext:muffle-conditions sb-ext:compiler-note))
+                   (values (* x 5) ; no compiler note from this
+                    (locally
+                      (declare (sb-ext:unmuffle-conditions sb-ext:compiler-note))
+                      ;; this one gives a compiler note
+                      (* x -5)))))))
+    (assert (= *compiler-note-count* 1))
+    (assert (equal (multiple-value-list (funcall fun 1)) '(5 -5)))))
+\f
+(handler-case
+    (eval '(flet ((%f (&key) nil)) (%f nil nil)))
+  (error (c) :good)
+  (:no-error (val) (error "no error: ~S" val)))
+(handler-case
+    (eval '(labels ((%f (&key x) x)) (%f nil nil)))
+  (error (c) :good)
+  (:no-error (val) (error "no error: ~S" val)))
 \f
 ;;;; tests not in the problem domain, but of the consistency of the
 ;;;; compiler machinery itself