0.8.3.59:

[sbcl.git] / tests / compiler.pure-cload.lisp

diff --git a/tests/compiler.pure-cload.lisp b/tests/compiler.pure-cload.lisp
index 8c7dd8e..9fe1951 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/compiler.pure-cload.lisp
+++ b/tests/compiler.pure-cload.lisp
@@ -20,3 +20,90 @@
   (declare (type (mod 1000) a b))
   (let ((tmp (= 10 (+ (incf a) (incf a) (incf b) (incf b)))))
     (or tmp (error "TMP not true"))))
+
+;;; Exercise a (byte-)compiler bug by causing a call to ERROR, not
+;;; because the symbol isn't defined as a variable, but because
+;;;  TYPE-ERROR in SB-KERNEL::OBJECT-NOT-TYPE-ERROR-HANDLER:
+;;;     0 is not of type (OR FUNCTION SB-KERNEL:FDEFN).
+;;; Correct behavior is to warn at compile time because the symbol
+;;; isn't declared as a variable, but to set its SYMBOL-VALUE anyway.
+;;; 
+;;; This bug was in sbcl-0.6.11.13.
+(print (setq improperly-declared-var '(1 2)))
+(assert (equal (symbol-value 'improperly-declared-var) '(1 2)))
+(makunbound 'improperly-declared-var)
+;;; This is a slightly different way of getting the same symptoms out
+;;; of the sbcl-0.6.11.13 byte compiler bug.
+(print (setq *print-level* *print-level*))
+
+;;; PROGV with different numbers of variables and values
+(let ((a 1))
+  (declare (special a))
+  (assert (equal (list a (progv '(a b) '(:a :b :c)
+                           (assert (eq (symbol-value 'nil) nil))
+                           (list (symbol-value 'a) (symbol-value 'b)))
+                       a)
+                 '(1 (:a :b) 1)))
+  (assert (equal (list a (progv '(a b) '(:a :b)
+                           (assert (eq (symbol-value 'nil) nil))
+                           (list (symbol-value 'a) (symbol-value 'b)))
+                       a)
+                 '(1 (:a :b) 1)))
+  (assert (not (boundp 'b))))
+
+(let ((a 1) (b 2))
+  (declare (special a b))
+  (assert (equal (list a b (progv '(a b) '(:a)
+                             (assert (eq (symbol-value 'nil) nil))
+                             (assert (not (boundp 'b)))
+                             (symbol-value 'a))
+                       a b)
+                 '(1 2 :a 1 2))))
+
+;;; bug in LOOP, reported by ??? on c.l.l
+(flet ((foo (l)
+         (loop for x in l
+               when (symbolp x) return x
+               while (numberp x)
+               collect (list x))))
+  (assert (equal (foo '(1 2 #\a 3)) '((1) (2))))
+  (assert (equal (foo '(1 2 x 3)) 'x)))
+
+;;; compiler failure found by Paul Dietz' randomized tortuter
+(defun #:foo (a b c d)
+  (declare (type (integer 240 100434465) a)
+           (optimize (speed 3) (safety 1) (debug 1)))
+  (logxor
+   (if (ldb-test (byte 27 4) d)
+       -1
+       (max 55546856 -431))
+   (logorc2
+    (if (>= 0 b)
+        (if (> b c) (logandc2 c d) (if (> d 224002) 0 d))
+        (signum (logior c b)))
+    (logior a -1))))
+
+;;; bug 282
+;;;
+;;; Verify type checking policy in full calls: the callee is supposed
+;;; to perform check, but the results should not be used before the
+;;; check will be actually performed.
+#+nil
+(locally
+    (declare (optimize (safety 3)))
+  (flet ((bar (f a)
+           (declare (type (simple-array (unsigned-byte 32) (*)) a))
+           (declare (type (function (fixnum)) f))
+           (funcall f (aref a 0))))
+    (assert
+     (eval `(let ((n (1+ most-positive-fixnum)))
+              (if (not (typep n '(unsigned-byte 32)))
+                  (warn 'style-warning
+                        "~@<This test is written for platforms with ~
+                        ~@<(proper-subtypep 'fixnum '(unsigned-byte 32))~:@>.~:@>")
+                  (block nil
+                    (funcall ,#'bar
+                             (lambda (x) (when (eql x n) (return t)))
+                             (make-array 1 :element-type '(unsigned-byte 32)
+                                         :initial-element n))
+                    nil)))))))