;;; This is a slightly different way of getting the same symptoms out
;;; of the sbcl-0.6.11.13 byte compiler bug.
(print (setq *print-level* *print-level*))
+
+;;; PROGV with different numbers of variables and values
+(let ((a 1))
+ (declare (special a))
+ (assert (equal (list a (progv '(a b) '(:a :b :c)
+ (assert (eq (symbol-value 'nil) nil))
+ (list (symbol-value 'a) (symbol-value 'b)))
+ a)
+ '(1 (:a :b) 1)))
+ (assert (equal (list a (progv '(a b) '(:a :b)
+ (assert (eq (symbol-value 'nil) nil))
+ (list (symbol-value 'a) (symbol-value 'b)))
+ a)
+ '(1 (:a :b) 1)))
+ (assert (not (boundp 'b))))
+
+(let ((a 1) (b 2))
+ (declare (special a b))
+ (assert (equal (list a b (progv '(a b) '(:a)
+ (assert (eq (symbol-value 'nil) nil))
+ (assert (not (boundp 'b)))
+ (symbol-value 'a))
+ a b)
+ '(1 2 :a 1 2))))
+
+;;; bug 282
+;;;
+;;; Verify type checking policy in full calls: the callee is supposed
+;;; to perform check, but the results should not be used before the
+;;; check will be actually performed.
+#+nil
+(locally
+ (declare (optimize (safety 3)))
+ (flet ((bar (f a)
+ (declare (type (simple-array (unsigned-byte 32) (*)) a))
+ (declare (type (function (fixnum)) f))
+ (funcall f (aref a 0))))
+ (assert
+ (eval `(let ((n (1+ most-positive-fixnum)))
+ (if (not (typep n '(unsigned-byte 32)))
+ (warn 'style-warning
+ "~@<This test is written for platforms with ~
+ ~@<(proper-subtypep 'fixnum '(unsigned-byte 32))~:@>.~:@>")
+ (block nil
+ (funcall ,#'bar
+ (lambda (x) (when (eql x n) (return t)))
+ (make-array 1 :element-type '(unsigned-byte 32)
+ :initial-element n))
+ nil)))))))