0.7.6:

[sbcl.git] / tests / compiler.pure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp
index 73a6c7d..53b9c67 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp
+++ b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp
@@ -114,3 +114,36 @@
     (assert (functionp fun))
     (assert (not warnings-p))
     (assert (not failure-p))))
+
+;;; a bug in 0.7.4.11
+(dolist (i '(a b 1 2 "x" "y"))
+  ;; In sbcl-0.7.4.11, the compiler tried to source-transform the
+  ;; TYPEP here but got confused and died, doing
+  ;;   (ASSOC '(AND INTEGERP (SATISFIES PLUSP)))
+  ;;          *BACKEND-TYPE-PREDICATES*
+  ;;          :TEST #'TYPE=)
+  ;; and blowing up because TYPE= tried to call PLUSP on the
+  ;; characters of the MEMBER-TYPE representing STANDARD-CHAR.
+  (when (typep i '(and integer (satisfies oddp)))
+    (print i)))
+(dotimes (i 14)
+  (when (typep i '(and integer (satisfies oddp)))
+    (print i)))
+
+;;; bug 156 (reported by APD sbcl-devel 2002-04-12, fixed by CSR patch
+;;; sbcl-devel 2002-07-02): FUNCTION-LAMBDA-EXPRESSION of
+;;; interactively-compiled functions was broken by sleaziness and
+;;; confusion in the assault on 0.7.0, so this expression used to
+;;; signal TYPE-ERROR when it found NIL instead of a DEBUG-SOURCE.
+(eval '(function-lambda-expression #'(lambda (x) x)))
+
+;;; bug caught and fixed by Raymond Toy cmucl-imp 2002-07-10: &REST
+;;; variable is not optional.
+(assert (null (ignore-errors (eval '(funcall (lambda (&rest) 12))))))
+
+;;; on the PPC, we got the magic numbers in undefined_tramp wrong for
+;;; a while; fixed by CSR 2002-07-18
+(multiple-value-bind (value error)
+    (ignore-errors (some-undefined-function))
+  (assert (null value))
+  (assert (eq (cell-error-name error) 'some-undefined-function)))