0.9.18.65:

[sbcl.git] / tests / compiler.pure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp
index 7e53ee2..95d2928 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp
+++ b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp
@@ -2130,15 +2130,22 @@
 
 ;;; overconfident primitive type computation leading to bogus type
 ;;; checking.
-(let* ((form1 '(lambda (x) 
-                (declare (type (and condition function) x)) 
+(let* ((form1 '(lambda (x)
+                (declare (type (and condition function) x))
                 x))
        (fun1 (compile nil form1))
-       (form2 '(lambda (x) 
-                (declare (type (and standard-object function) x)) 
+       (form2 '(lambda (x)
+                (declare (type (and standard-object function) x))
                 x))
        (fun2 (compile nil form2)))
   (assert (raises-error? (funcall fun1 (make-condition 'error))))
   (assert (raises-error? (funcall fun1 fun1)))
   (assert (raises-error? (funcall fun2 fun2)))
   (assert (eq (funcall fun2 #'print-object) #'print-object)))
+
+;;; LET* + VALUES declaration: while the declaration is a non-standard
+;;; and possibly a non-conforming extension, as long as we do support
+;;; it, we might as well get it right.
+;;;
+;;; Bug reported by Kaersten Poeck on sbcl-devel 20061023.
+(compile nil '(lambda () (let* () (declare (values list)))))