(assert (nth-value 2 (compile nil
`(lambda (x)
(1+ (,fun #'print x)))))))
+
+(assert (nth-value 2 (compile nil
+ '(lambda ()
+ (declare (notinline mapcar))
+ (1+ (mapcar #'print '(1 2 3)))))))
+
+;;; bug found by Paul Dietz: (SETF AREF) for bit vectors with constant
+;;; index was effectless
+(let ((f (compile nil '(lambda (a v)
+ (declare (type simple-bit-vector a) (type bit v))
+ (declare (optimize (speed 3) (safety 0)))
+ (setf (aref a 0) v)
+ a))))
+ (let ((y (make-array 2 :element-type 'bit :initial-element 0)))
+ (assert (equal y #*00))
+ (funcall f y 1)
+ (assert (equal y #*10))))
+
+(handler-bind ((sb-ext:compiler-note #'error))
+ (compile nil '(lambda (x)
+ (declare (type (simple-array (simple-string 3) (5)) x))
+ (aref (aref x 0) 0))))
+
+;;; compiler failure
+(let ((f (compile nil '(lambda (x) (typep x '(not (member 0d0)))))))
+ (assert (funcall f 1d0)))
+
+(compile nil '(lambda (x)
+ (declare (double-float x))
+ (let ((y (* x pi)))
+ (atan y y))))
+
+;;; bogus optimization of BIT-NOT
+(multiple-value-bind (result x)
+ (eval '(let ((x (eval #*1001)))
+ (declare (optimize (speed 2) (space 3))
+ (type (bit-vector) x))
+ (values (bit-not x nil) x)))
+ (assert (equal x #*1001))
+ (assert (equal result #*0110)))
+
+;;; the VECTOR type in CONCATENATE/MERGE/MAKE-SEQUENCE means (VECTOR T).
+(handler-bind ((sb-ext:compiler-note #'error))
+ (assert (equalp (funcall
+ (compile
+ nil
+ '(lambda ()
+ (let ((x (make-sequence 'vector 10 :initial-element 'a)))
+ (setf (aref x 4) 'b)
+ x))))
+ #(a a a a b a a a a a))))
+
+;;; this is not a check for a bug, but rather a test of compiler
+;;; quality
+(dolist (type '((integer 0 *) ; upper bound
+ (real (-1) *)
+ float ; class
+ (real * (-10)) ; lower bound
+ ))
+ (assert (nth-value
+ 1 (compile nil
+ `(lambda (n)
+ (declare (optimize (speed 3) (compilation-speed 0)))
+ (loop for i from 1 to (the (integer -17 10) n) by 2
+ collect (when (> (random 10) 5)
+ (the ,type (- i 11)))))))))
+
+;;; bug 278b
+;;;
+;;; We suppose that INTEGER arithmetic cannot be efficient, and the
+;;; compiler has an optimized VOP for +; so this code should cause an
+;;; efficiency note.
+(assert (eq (block nil
+ (handler-case
+ (compile nil '(lambda (i)
+ (declare (optimize speed))
+ (declare (type integer i))
+ (+ i 2)))
+ (sb-ext:compiler-note (c) (return :good))))
+ :good))
+
+;;; bug 277: IGNORE/IGNORABLE declarations should be acceptable for
+;;; symbol macros
+(assert (not (nth-value 1 (compile nil '(lambda (u v)
+ (symbol-macrolet ((x u)
+ (y v))
+ (declare (ignore x)
+ (ignorable y))
+ (list u v)))))))
+
+;;; bug reported by Paul Dietz: wrong optimizer for (EXPT ... 0)
+(loop for (x type) in
+ '((14 integer)
+ (14 rational)
+ (-14/3 (rational -8 11))
+ (3s0 short-float)
+ (4f0 single-float)
+ (5d0 double-float)
+ (6l0 long-float)
+ (14 real)
+ (13/2 real)
+ (2s0 real)
+ (2d0 real)
+ (#c(-3 4) (complex fixnum))
+ (#c(-3 4) (complex rational))
+ (#c(-3/7 4) (complex rational))
+ (#c(2s0 3s0) (complex short-float))
+ (#c(2f0 3f0) (complex single-float))
+ (#c(2d0 3d0) (complex double-float))
+ (#c(2l0 3l0) (complex long-float))
+ (#c(2d0 3s0) (complex float))
+ (#c(2 3f0) (complex real))
+ (#c(2 3d0) (complex real))
+ (#c(-3/7 4) (complex real))
+ (#c(-3/7 4) complex)
+ (#c(2 3l0) complex))
+ do (dolist (zero '(0 0s0 0f0 0d0 0l0))
+ (dolist (real-zero (list zero (- zero)))
+ (let* ((src `(lambda (x) (expt (the ,type x) ,real-zero)))
+ (fun (compile nil src))
+ (result (1+ (funcall (eval #'*) x real-zero))))
+ (assert (eql result (funcall fun x)))))))
+
+;;; (SIGNED-BYTE 1) [ returned from the logxor derive-type optimizer ]
+;;; wasn't recognized as a good type specifier.
+(let ((fun (lambda (x y)
+ (declare (type (integer -1 0) x y) (optimize speed))
+ (logxor x y))))
+ (assert (= (funcall fun 0 0) 0))
+ (assert (= (funcall fun 0 -1) -1))
+ (assert (= (funcall fun -1 -1) 0)))
+
+;;; from PFD's torture test, triggering a bug in our effective address
+;;; treatment.
+(compile
+ nil
+ `(lambda (a b)
+ (declare (type (integer 8 22337) b))
+ (logandc2
+ (logandc2
+ (* (logandc1 (max -29303 b) 4) b)
+ (abs (logorc1 (+ (logandc1 -11 b) 2607688420) -31153924)))
+ (logeqv (max a 0) b))))
+
+;;; Alpha floating point modes weren't being reset after an exception,
+;;; leading to an exception on the second compile, below.
+(compile nil '(lambda (x y) (declare (type (double-float 0.0d0) x y)) (/ x y)))
+(handler-case (/ 1.0 0.0)
+ ;; provoke an exception
+ (arithmetic-error ()))
+(compile nil '(lambda (x y) (declare (type (double-float 0.0d0) x y)) (/ x y)))
+
+;;; bug reported by Paul Dietz: component last block does not have
+;;; start ctran
+(compile nil
+ '(lambda ()
+ (declare (notinline + logand)
+ (optimize (speed 0)))
+ (LOGAND
+ (BLOCK B5
+ (FLET ((%F1 ()
+ (RETURN-FROM B5 -220)))
+ (LET ((V7 (%F1)))
+ (+ 359749 35728422))))
+ -24076)))
+
+;;; bug 294 reported by Paul Dietz: miscompilation of REM and MOD
+(assert (= (funcall (compile nil `(lambda (b)
+ (declare (optimize (speed 3))
+ (type (integer 2 152044363) b))
+ (rem b (min -16 0))))
+ 108251912)
+ 8))
+
+(assert (= (funcall (compile nil `(lambda (c)
+ (declare (optimize (speed 3))
+ (type (integer 23062188 149459656) c))
+ (mod c (min -2 0))))
+ 95019853)
+ -1))
+
+;;; bug reported by Paul Dietz: block splitting inside FLUSH-DEAD-CODE
+(compile nil
+ '(LAMBDA (A B C)
+ (BLOCK B6
+ (LOGEQV (REM C -6758)
+ (REM B (MAX 44 (RETURN-FROM B6 A)))))))
+
+(compile nil '(lambda ()
+ (block nil
+ (flet ((foo (x y) (if (> x y) (print x) (print y))))
+ (foo 1 2)
+ (bar)
+ (foo (return 14) 2)))))
+
+;;; bug in Alpha backend: not enough sanity checking of arguments to
+;;; instructions
+(assert (= (funcall (compile nil
+ '(lambda (x)
+ (declare (fixnum x))
+ (ash x -257)))
+ 1024)
+ 0))
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff