(fun (compile nil src))
(result (1+ (funcall (eval #'*) x real-zero))))
(assert (eql result (funcall fun x)))))))
+
+;;; (SIGNED-BYTE 1) [ returned from the logxor derive-type optimizer ]
+;;; wasn't recognized as a good type specifier.
+(let ((fun (lambda (x y)
+ (declare (type (integer -1 0) x y) (optimize speed))
+ (logxor x y))))
+ (assert (= (funcall fun 0 0) 0))
+ (assert (= (funcall fun 0 -1) -1))
+ (assert (= (funcall fun -1 -1) 0)))
+
+;;; from PFD's torture test, triggering a bug in our effective address
+;;; treatment.
+(compile
+ nil
+ `(lambda (a b)
+ (declare (type (integer 8 22337) b))
+ (logandc2
+ (logandc2
+ (* (logandc1 (max -29303 b) 4) b)
+ (abs (logorc1 (+ (logandc1 -11 b) 2607688420) -31153924)))
+ (logeqv (max a 0) b))))
+
+;;; Alpha floating point modes weren't being reset after an exception,
+;;; leading to an exception on the second compile, below.
+(compile nil '(lambda (x y) (declare (type (double-float 0.0d0) x y)) (/ x y)))
+(handler-case (/ 1.0 0.0)
+ ;; provoke an exception
+ (arithmetic-error ()))
+(compile nil '(lambda (x y) (declare (type (double-float 0.0d0) x y)) (/ x y)))
+
+;;; bug reported by Paul Dietz: component last block does not have
+;;; start ctran
+(compile nil
+ '(lambda ()
+ (declare (notinline + logand)
+ (optimize (speed 0)))
+ (LOGAND
+ (BLOCK B5
+ (FLET ((%F1 ()
+ (RETURN-FROM B5 -220)))
+ (LET ((V7 (%F1)))
+ (+ 359749 35728422))))
+ -24076)))
+
+;;; bug 294 reported by Paul Dietz: miscompilation of REM and MOD
+(assert (= (funcall (compile nil `(lambda (b)
+ (declare (optimize (speed 3))
+ (type (integer 2 152044363) b))
+ (rem b (min -16 0))))
+ 108251912)
+ 8))
+
+(assert (= (funcall (compile nil `(lambda (c)
+ (declare (optimize (speed 3))
+ (type (integer 23062188 149459656) c))
+ (mod c (min -2 0))))
+ 95019853)
+ -1))
+
+;;; bug reported by Paul Dietz: block splitting inside FLUSH-DEAD-CODE
+(compile nil
+ '(LAMBDA (A B C)
+ (BLOCK B6
+ (LOGEQV (REM C -6758)
+ (REM B (MAX 44 (RETURN-FROM B6 A)))))))
+
+(compile nil '(lambda ()
+ (block nil
+ (flet ((foo (x y) (if (> x y) (print x) (print y))))
+ (foo 1 2)
+ (bar)
+ (foo (return 14) 2)))))
+
+;;; bug in Alpha backend: not enough sanity checking of arguments to
+;;; instructions
+(assert (= (funcall (compile nil
+ '(lambda (x)
+ (declare (fixnum x))
+ (ash x -257)))
+ 1024)
+ 0))
+
+;;; bug found by WHN and pfdietz: compiler failure while referencing
+;;; an entry point inside a deleted lambda
+(compile nil '(lambda ()
+ (let (r3533)
+ (flet ((bbfn ()
+ (setf r3533
+ (progn
+ (flet ((truly (fn bbd)
+ (let (r3534)
+ (let ((p3537 nil))
+ (unwind-protect
+ (multiple-value-prog1
+ (progn
+ (setf r3534
+ (progn
+ (bubf bbd t)
+ (flet ((c-3536 ()
+ (funcall fn)))
+ (cdec #'c-3536
+ (vector bbd))))))
+ (setf p3537 t))
+ (unless p3537
+ (error "j"))))
+ r3534))
+ (c (pd) (pdc pd)))
+ (let ((a (smock a))
+ (b (smock b))
+ (b (smock c)))))))))
+ (wum #'bbfn "hc3" (list)))
+ r3533)))
+(compile nil '(lambda () (flet ((%f () (unwind-protect nil))) nil)))
+
+;;; the strength reduction of constant multiplication used (before
+;;; sbcl-0.8.4.x) to lie to the compiler. This meant that, under
+;;; certain circumstances, the compiler would derive that a perfectly
+;;; reasonable multiplication never returned, causing chaos. Fixed by
+;;; explicitly doing modular arithmetic, and relying on the backends
+;;; being smart.
+(assert (= (funcall
+ (compile nil
+ '(lambda (x)
+ (declare (type (integer 178956970 178956970) x)
+ (optimize speed))
+ (* x 24)))
+ 178956970)
+ 4294967280))
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff