1.0.13.38: final part of the debug-name improvements

[sbcl.git] / tests / compiler.pure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp
index d460817..ce69513 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp
+++ b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp
@@ -774,6 +774,35 @@
                          (declare (type (integer 4303063 101130078) a))
                          (mask-field (byte 18 2) (ash a 77))))
               57132532)))
+;;; rewrite the test case to get the unsigned-byte 32/64
+;;; implementation even after implementing some modular arithmetic
+;;; with signed-byte 30:
+(assert (= 0 (funcall
+              (compile nil
+                       '(lambda (a)
+                         (declare (type (integer 4303063 101130078) a))
+                         (mask-field (byte 30 2) (ash a 77))))
+              57132532)))
+(assert (= 0 (funcall
+              (compile nil
+                       '(lambda (a)
+                         (declare (type (integer 4303063 101130078) a))
+                         (mask-field (byte 64 2) (ash a 77))))
+              57132532)))
+;;; and a similar test case for the signed masking extension (not the
+;;; final interface, so change the call when necessary):
+(assert (= 0 (funcall
+              (compile nil
+                       '(lambda (a)
+                         (declare (type (integer 4303063 101130078) a))
+                         (sb-c::mask-signed-field 30 (ash a 77))))
+              57132532)))
+(assert (= 0 (funcall
+              (compile nil
+                       '(lambda (a)
+                         (declare (type (integer 4303063 101130078) a))
+                         (sb-c::mask-signed-field 61 (ash a 77))))
+              57132532)))
 
 ;;; MISC.101 and MISC.103: FLUSH-DEST did not mark the USE's block for
 ;;; type check regeneration
@@ -1947,7 +1976,7 @@
                                              (bit #*1001101001001
                                                   (min 12 (max 0 lv3))))))))))))
 
-;;; MISC.624: erronous AVER in x86's %LOGBITP VOPs
+;;; MISC.624: erroneous AVER in x86's %LOGBITP VOPs
 (assert (eql 0
              (funcall
               (compile
@@ -2287,3 +2316,10 @@
                      t)
                    t
                    (error "~a" y)))))
+
+;;; Compiling W-P-O when the pinned objects are known to be fixnums
+;;; or characters.
+(compile nil '(lambda (x y)
+               (declare (fixnum y) (character x))
+               (sb-sys:with-pinned-objects (x y)
+                 (some-random-function))))