0.9.16.27:

[sbcl.git] / tests / compiler.pure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp
index 0f94a7a..cfc11c1 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/compiler.pure.lisp
+++ b/tests/compiler.pure.lisp
@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@
 
 (cl:in-package :cl-user)
 
+;; The tests in this file assume that EVAL will use the compiler
+(when (eq sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :interpret)
+  (invoke-restart 'run-tests::skip-file))
+
 ;;; Exercise a compiler bug (by crashing the compiler).
 ;;;
 ;;; This test code is from Douglas Crosher's simplified TICKLE-BUG
@@ -2108,3 +2112,17 @@
                           0))
                    (apply #'%f3 0 nil)))))
   (assert (zerop (funcall (compile nil form)))))
+
+;;;  size mismatch: #<SB-VM::EA :DWORD base=#<SB-C:TN t1[RDX]> disp=1> is a :DWORD and #<SB-C:TN t2[RAX]> is a :QWORD. on x86-64
+(compile nil '(lambda ()
+               (let ((x (make-array '(1) :element-type '(signed-byte 32))))
+                 (setf (aref x 0) 1))))
+
+;;; step instrumentation confusing the compiler, reported by Faré
+(handler-bind ((warning #'error))
+  (compile nil '(lambda ()
+                 (declare (optimize (debug 2))) ; not debug 3!
+                 (let ((val "foobar"))
+                   (map-into (make-array (list (length val))
+                                         :element-type '(unsigned-byte 8))
+                             #'char-code val)))))