;;;; more information.
(cl:in-package :cl-user)
+
+;;; The debugger doesn't have any native knowledge of the interpreter
+(when (eq sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :interpret)
+ (sb-ext:exit :code 104))
+
\f
;;;; Check that we get debug arglists right.
+(defvar *p* (namestring *load-truename*))
+
;;; FIXME: This should use some get-argslist like functionality that
;;; we actually export.
;;;
;; happen to be the two case that I had my nose rubbed in when
;; debugging a GC problem caused by applying %SIMPLE-FUN-ARGLIST to
;; a closure. -- WHN 2001-06-05)
- (t :unknown)))
+ (t
+ #+sb-eval
+ (if (typep fun 'sb-eval::interpreted-function)
+ (sb-eval::interpreted-function-lambda-list fun)
+ :unknown)
+ #-sb-eval
+ :unknown)))
(defun zoop (zeep &key beep)
blurp)
;;; argument of PRINT might be SB-IMPL::OBJECT or SB-KERNEL::OBJ or
;;; whatever. But we do know the general structure that a correct
;;; answer should have, so we can safely do a lot of checks.)
-(destructuring-bind (object-sym &optional-sym stream-sym) (get-arglist #'print)
- (assert (symbolp object-sym))
- (assert (eql &optional-sym '&optional))
- (assert (symbolp stream-sym)))
-(destructuring-bind (dest-sym control-sym &rest-sym format-args-sym)
- (get-arglist #'format)
- (assert (symbolp dest-sym))
- (assert (symbolp control-sym))
- (assert (eql &rest-sym '&rest))
- (assert (symbolp format-args-sym)))
+(with-test (:name :predefined-functions-1)
+ (destructuring-bind (object-sym &optional-sym stream-sym) (get-arglist #'print)
+ (assert (symbolp object-sym))
+ (assert (eql &optional-sym '&optional))
+ (assert (symbolp stream-sym))))
+(with-test (:name :predefined-functions-2)
+ (destructuring-bind (dest-sym control-sym &rest-sym format-args-sym)
+ (get-arglist #'format)
+ (assert (symbolp dest-sym))
+ (assert (symbolp control-sym))
+ (assert (eql &rest-sym '&rest))
+ (assert (symbolp format-args-sym))))
;;; Check for backtraces generally being correct. Ensure that the
;;; actual backtrace finishes (doesn't signal any errors on its own),
(handler-bind
((error (lambda (condition)
;; find the part of the backtrace we're interested in
- (let ((backtrace (progn
- ;; (backtrace 13)
- (member (caar frame-specs)
- (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list)
- :key #'car
- :test #'equal))))
+ (let* ((full-backtrace (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list))
+ (backtrace (member (caar frame-specs) full-backtrace
+ :key #'car
+ :test #'equal)))
(setf result condition)
(unless backtrace
- (print :missing-backtrace)
+ (format t "~&//~S not in backtrace:~% ~S~%"
+ (caar frame-specs)
+ full-backtrace)
(setf result nil))
-
;; check that we have all the frames we wanted
(mapcar
(lambda (spec frame)
(and (equal (car spec) (car frame))
(args-equal (cdr spec)
(cdr frame))))
- (print (list :mismatch spec frame))
+ (print (list :wanted spec :got frame))
(setf result nil)))
frame-specs
backtrace)
;; Make sure the backtrace isn't stunted in
;; any way. (Depends on running in the main
- ;; thread.)
- (let ((end (last backtrace 2)))
- (unless (equal (caar end)
- (if *show-entry-point-details*
- '(sb-c::tl-xep sb-impl::toplevel-init)
- 'sb-impl::toplevel-init))
- (print (list :backtrace-stunted (caar end)))
- (setf result nil)))
+ ;; thread.) FIXME: On Windows we get two
+ ;; extra foreign frames below regular frames.
+ (unless (find '(sb-impl::toplevel-init) backtrace
+ :test #'equal)
+ (print (list :backtrace-stunted backtrace))
+ (setf result nil))
(return-from outer-handler)))))
(funcall test-function)))
result)))
(defvar *undefined-function-frame*
;; bug 353
- '(#+(or x86 x86-64) "bogus stack frame"
- #-(or x86 x86-64) "undefined function"))
+ '("undefined function"))
;;; Test for "undefined function" (undefined_tramp) working properly.
;;; Try it with and without tail call elimination, since they can have
(funcall fun)))
(with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-346)
- :fails-on '(or :alpha)) ; bug 346
+ ;; Failures on ALPHA, SPARC, MIPS, and probably
+ ;; HPPA are due to not having a full and valid
+ ;; stack frame for the undefined function frame.
+ ;; See PPC undefined_tramp for details.
+ :fails-on '(or :alpha :sparc :mips
+ (and :x86-64 :freebsd)))
(assert (verify-backtrace
(lambda () (test #'optimized))
(list *undefined-function-frame*
- (list '(flet test) #'optimized)))))
+ (list `(flet test :in ,*p*) #'optimized)))))
;; bug 353: This test fails at least most of the time for x86/linux
;; ca. 0.8.20.16. -- WHN
- (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-356)
- :fails-on '(or (and :x86 :linux) :alpha))
+ (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-353))
(assert (verify-backtrace
(lambda () (test #'not-optimized))
(list *undefined-function-frame*
- (list '(flet not-optimized))
- (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized))))))
-
-;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC. It depended on the
+ (list `(flet not-optimized :in ,*p*))
+ (list `(flet test :in ,*p*) #'not-optimized))))))
+
+(with-test (:name :backtrace-interrupted-condition-wait
+ :skipped-on '(not :sb-thread)
+ ;; For some unfathomable reason the backtrace becomes
+ ;; stunted, ending at _sigtramp, when we add :TIMEOUT NIL to
+ ;; the frame we expect. If we leave it out, the backtrace is
+ ;; fine -- but the test fails. I can only boggle right now.
+ :fails-on '(and :x86 (or :linux :darwin)))
+ (let ((m (sb-thread:make-mutex))
+ (q (sb-thread:make-waitqueue)))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace
+ (lambda ()
+ (sb-thread:with-mutex (m)
+ (handler-bind ((timeout (lambda (c)
+ (error "foo"))))
+ (with-timeout 0.1
+ (sb-thread:condition-wait q m)))))
+ `((sb-thread:condition-wait ,q ,m :timeout nil))))))
+
+;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC. It depended on the
;;; return function either being before INTEGER-/-INTEGER in memory,
-;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead. It also depends on
-;;; INTEGER-/-INTEGER calling SIGNED-TRUNCATE. I believe Raymond Toy
+;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead. It also depends on
+;;; INTEGER-/-INTEGER calling SIGNED-TRUNCATE. I believe Raymond Toy
;;; says that the Sparc backend (at least for CMUCL) inlines this, so
;;; if SBCL does the same this test is probably not good for the
;;; Sparc.
(declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination
(funcall fun)))
(with-test (:name (:divide-by-zero :bug-346)
- :fails-on '(or :alpha)) ; bug 346
+ :fails-on :alpha) ; bug 346
(assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized))
(list '(/ 42 &rest)
- (list '(flet test) #'optimized)))))
+ (list `(flet test :in ,*p*) #'optimized)))))
(with-test (:name (:divide-by-zero :bug-356)
- :fails-on '(or :alpha)) ; bug 356
+ :fails-on :alpha) ; bug 356
(assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized))
(list '(/ 42 &rest)
- '((flet not-optimized))
- (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized))))))
+ `((flet not-optimized :in ,*p*))
+ (list `(flet test :in ,*p*) #'not-optimized))))))
(with-test (:name (:throw :no-such-tag)
- :fails-on '(or (and :x86 :linux) (and :x86 :freebsd) :alpha :mips))
+ :fails-on '(or
+ (and :sparc :linux)
+ :alpha
+ :mips))
(progn
(defun throw-test ()
(throw 'no-such-tag t))
(assert (verify-backtrace #'throw-test '((throw-test))))))
+(defun bug-308926 (x)
+ (let ((v "foo"))
+ (flet ((bar (z)
+ (oops v z)
+ (oops z v)))
+ (bar x)
+ (bar v))))
+
+(with-test (:name :bug-308926)
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-308926 13))
+ '(((flet bar :in bug-308926) 13)
+ (bug-308926 &rest t)))))
+
;;; test entry point handling in backtraces
(defun oops ()
(error "oops"))
+(with-test (:name :xep-too-many-arguments)
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (oops 1 2 3 4 5 6))
+ '((oops ? ? ? ? ? ?)))))
+
(defmacro defbt (n ll &body body)
- `(progn
- ;; normal debug info
- (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.1" n)) ,ll
- ,@body)
- ;; no arguments saved
- (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.2" n)) ,ll
- (declare (optimize (debug 1) (speed 3)))
- ,@body)
- ;; no lambda-list saved
- (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.3" n)) ,ll
- (declare (optimize (debug 0)))
- ,@body)))
+ ;; WTF is this? This is a way to make these tests not depend so much on the
+ ;; details of LOAD/EVAL. Around 1.0.57 we changed %SIMPLE-EVAL to be
+ ;; slightly smarter, which meant that things which used to have xeps
+ ;; suddently had tl-xeps, etc. This takes care of that.
+ `(funcall
+ (compile nil
+ '(lambda ()
+ (progn
+ ;; normal debug info
+ (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.1" n)) ,ll
+ ,@body)
+ ;; no arguments saved
+ (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.2" n)) ,ll
+ (declare (optimize (debug 1) (speed 3)))
+ ,@body)
+ ;; no lambda-list saved
+ (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.3" n)) ,ll
+ (declare (optimize (debug 0)))
+ ,@body))))))
(defbt 1 (&key key)
(list key))
(defbt 5 (&optional (opt (oops)))
(list opt))
+(defmacro with-details (bool &body body)
+ `(let ((sb-debug:*show-entry-point-details* ,bool))
+ ,@body))
+
+(defun bug-354 (x)
+ (error "XEPs in backtraces: ~S" x))
+
+(with-test (:name :bug-354)
+ (with-details t
+ (assert (not (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354))
+ '((bug-354 &rest)
+ ((sb-c::tl-xep bug-354) &rest))))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354)) '((bug-354 354)))))
+
;;; FIXME: This test really should be broken into smaller pieces
-(with-test (:name (:backtrace :misc)
- :fails-on '(and :x86 :linux))
- (macrolet ((with-details (bool &body body)
- `(let ((sb-debug:*show-entry-point-details* ,bool))
- ,@body)))
-
- ;; TL-XEP
- (print :tl-xep)
- (with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring
- '(((sb-c::tl-xep namestring) 0 ?)))))
- (with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring
- '((namestring)))))
-
-
- ;; &MORE-PROCESSOR
- (with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key))
- '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.1) &rest))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key))
- '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.2) &rest))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key))
- '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.3) &rest)))))
- (with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key))
- '((bt.1.1 :key))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key))
- '((bt.1.2 &rest))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key))
- '((bt.1.3 &rest)))))
-
- ;; XEP
- (print :xep)
- (with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1
- '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.1) 0 ?))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2
- '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.2) &rest))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3
- '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.3) &rest)))))
- (with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1
- '((bt.2.1))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2
- '((bt.2.2 &rest))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3
- '((bt.2.3 &rest)))))
-
- ;; VARARGS-ENTRY
- (print :varargs-entry)
- (with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1
- '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.1) :key nil))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2
- '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.2) :key ?))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3
- '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.3) &rest)))))
- (with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1
- '((bt.3.1 :key nil))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2
- '((bt.3.2 :key ?))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3
- '((bt.3.3 &rest)))))
-
- ;; HAIRY-ARG-PROCESSOR
- (print :hairy-args-processor)
- (with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1
- '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.1) ?))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2
- '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.2) ?))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3
- '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.3) &rest)))))
- (with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1
- '((bt.4.1 ?))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2
- '((bt.4.2 ?))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3
- '((bt.4.3 &rest)))))
-
- ;; &OPTIONAL-PROCESSOR
- (print :optional-processor)
- (with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1
- '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.1)))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2
- '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.2) &rest))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3
- '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.3) &rest)))))
- (with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1
- '((bt.5.1))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2
- '((bt.5.2 &rest))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3
- '((bt.5.3 &rest)))))))
+(with-test (:name (:backtrace :tl-xep))
+ (with-details t
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring
+ '(((sb-c::tl-xep namestring) 0 ?)))))
+ (with-details nil
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring
+ '((namestring))))))
+
+(with-test (:name (:backtrace :more-processor))
+ (with-details t
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key))
+ '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.1) &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key))
+ '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.2) &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key))
+ '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.3) &rest)))))
+ (with-details nil
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key))
+ '((bt.1.1 :key))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key))
+ '((bt.1.2 &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key))
+ '((bt.1.3 &rest))))))
+
+(with-test (:name (:backtrace :xep))
+ (with-details t
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1
+ '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.1) 0 ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2
+ '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.2) &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3
+ '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.3) &rest)))))
+ (with-details nil
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1
+ '((bt.2.1))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2
+ '((bt.2.2 &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3
+ '((bt.2.3 &rest))))))
+
+(with-test (:name (:backtrace :varargs-entry))
+ (with-details t
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1
+ '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.1) :key nil))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2
+ '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.2) :key ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3
+ '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.3) &rest)))))
+ (with-details nil
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1
+ '((bt.3.1 :key nil))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2
+ '((bt.3.2 :key ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3
+ '((bt.3.3 &rest))))))
+
+(with-test (:name (:backtrace :hairy-args-processor))
+ (with-details t
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1
+ '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.1) ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2
+ '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.2) ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3
+ '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.3) &rest)))))
+ (with-details nil
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1
+ '((bt.4.1 ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2
+ '((bt.4.2 ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3
+ '((bt.4.3 &rest))))))
+
+
+(with-test (:name (:backtrace :optional-processor))
+ (with-details t
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1
+ '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.1)))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2
+ '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.2) &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3
+ '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.3) &rest)))))
+ (with-details nil
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1
+ '((bt.5.1))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2
+ '((bt.5.2 &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3
+ '((bt.5.3 &rest))))))
+
+(write-line "//compile nil")
+(defvar *compile-nil-error* (compile nil '(lambda (x) (cons (when x (error "oops")) nil))))
+(defvar *compile-nil-non-tc* (compile nil '(lambda (y) (cons (funcall *compile-nil-error* y) nil))))
+(with-test (:name (:compile nil))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (funcall *compile-nil-non-tc* 13))
+ `(((lambda (x) :in ,*p*) 13)
+ ((lambda (y) :in ,*p*) 13)))))
+
+(with-test (:name :clos-slot-typecheckfun-named)
+ (assert
+ (verify-backtrace
+ (lambda ()
+ (eval `(locally (declare (optimize safety))
+ (defclass clos-typecheck-test ()
+ ((slot :type fixnum)))
+ (setf (slot-value (make-instance 'clos-typecheck-test) 'slot) t))))
+ '(((sb-pcl::slot-typecheck fixnum) t)))))
+
+(with-test (:name :clos-emf-named)
+ (assert
+ (verify-backtrace
+ (lambda ()
+ (eval `(progn
+ (defmethod clos-emf-named-test ((x symbol)) x)
+ (defmethod clos-emf-named-test :before (x) (assert x))
+ (clos-emf-named-test nil))))
+ '(((sb-pcl::emf clos-emf-named-test) ? ? nil)))))
+
+(with-test (:name :bug-310173)
+ (flet ((make-fun (n)
+ (let* ((names '(a b))
+ (req (loop repeat n collect (pop names))))
+ (compile nil
+ `(lambda (,@req &rest rest)
+ (let ((* *)) ; no tail-call
+ (apply '/ ,@req rest)))))))
+ (assert
+ (verify-backtrace (lambda ()
+ (funcall (make-fun 0) 10 11 0))
+ `((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0)
+ (/ 10 11 0)
+ ((lambda (&rest rest) :in ,*p*) 10 11 0))))
+ (assert
+ (verify-backtrace (lambda ()
+ (funcall (make-fun 1) 10 11 0))
+ `((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0)
+ (/ 10 11 0)
+ ((lambda (a &rest rest) :in ,*p*) 10 11 0))))
+ (assert
+ (verify-backtrace (lambda ()
+ (funcall (make-fun 2) 10 11 0))
+ `((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0)
+ (/ 10 11 0)
+ ((lambda (a b &rest rest) :in ,*p*) 10 11 0))))))
;;;; test TRACE
(defun trace-this ()
'ok)
-(let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*)
- (trace trace-this)
- (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this)))
- (untrace))))
- (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out))
- (assert (search "returned OK" out)))
+(defun trace-fact (n)
+ (if (zerop n)
+ 1
+ (* n (trace-fact (1- n)))))
+
+(with-test (:name (trace :simple))
+ (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*)
+ (trace trace-this)
+ (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this)))
+ (untrace))))
+ (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out))
+ (assert (search "returned OK" out))))
;;; bug 379
;;; This is not a WITH-TEST :FAILS-ON PPC DARWIN since there are
;;; suspicions that the breakpoint trace might corrupt the whole image
;;; on that platform.
-#-(and (or ppc x86) darwin)
(with-test (:name (trace :encapsulate nil)
- :fails-on '(or ppc sparc))
+ :fails-on '(or (and :ppc (not :linux)) :sparc :mips)
+ :broken-on '(or :darwin :sunos))
(let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*)
(trace trace-this :encapsulate nil)
(assert (eq 'ok (trace-this)))
(assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out))
(assert (search "returned OK" out))))
+(with-test (:name (trace-recursive :encapsulate nil)
+ :fails-on '(or (and :ppc (not :linux)) :sparc :mips :sunos)
+ :broken-on '(or :darwin (and :x86 :sunos)))
+ (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*)
+ (trace trace-fact :encapsulate nil)
+ (assert (= 120 (trace-fact 5)))
+ (untrace))))
+ (assert (search "TRACE-FACT" out))
+ (assert (search "returned 1" out))
+ (assert (search "returned 120" out))))
+
+(defun trace-and-fmakunbound-this (x)
+ x)
+
+(with-test (:name :bug-667657)
+ (trace trace-and-fmakunbound-this)
+ (fmakunbound 'trace-and-fmakunbound-this)
+ (untrace)
+ (assert (not (trace))))
+
+(with-test (:name :bug-414)
+ (handler-bind ((warning #'error))
+ (load (compile-file "bug-414.lisp"))
+ (disassemble 'bug-414)))
+
+(with-test (:name :bug-310175 :fails-on '(not :stack-allocatable-lists))
+ ;; KLUDGE: Not all DX-enabled platforms DX CONS, and the compiler
+ ;; transforms two-arg-LIST* (and one-arg-LIST) to CONS. Therefore,
+ ;; use two-arg-LIST, which should get through to VOP LIST, and thus
+ ;; stack-allocate on a predictable set of machines.
+ (let ((dx-arg (list t t)))
+ (declare (dynamic-extent dx-arg))
+ (flet ((dx-arg-backtrace (x)
+ (declare (optimize (debug 2)))
+ (prog1 (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list 10)
+ (assert (sb-debug::stack-allocated-p x)))))
+ (declare (notinline dx-arg-backtrace))
+ (assert (member-if (lambda (frame)
+ (and (consp frame)
+ (consp (car frame))
+ (equal '(flet dx-arg-backtrace :in) (butlast (car frame)))
+ (notany #'sb-debug::stack-allocated-p (cdr frame))))
+ (dx-arg-backtrace dx-arg))))))
+
+(with-test (:name :bug-795245)
+ (assert
+ (eq :ok
+ (catch 'done
+ (handler-bind
+ ((error (lambda (e)
+ (declare (ignore e))
+ (handler-case
+ (sb-debug:backtrace 100 (make-broadcast-stream))
+ (error ()
+ (throw 'done :error))
+ (:no-error ()
+ (throw 'done :ok))))))
+ (apply '/= nil 1 2 nil))))))
+
;;;; test infinite error protection
(defmacro nest-errors (n-levels error-form)
;; after 50 successful throws to SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-CATCHER sbcl used
;; to halt, it produces so much garbage that's hard to suppress that
;; it is tested only once
+ (write-line "--HARMLESS BUT ALARMING BACKTRACE COMING UP--")
(let ((*debugger-hook* #'erroring-debugger-hook))
(loop repeat 1 do
(let ((error-counter 0)
(catch 'sb-impl::toplevel-catcher
(nest-errors 20 (error "infinite error ~s"
(incf error-counter)))
- :normal-exit))))))))
-
-(enable-debugger)
+ :normal-exit)))))))
+ (write-line "--END OF H-B-A-B--"))
-(test-inifinite-error-protection)
+(with-test (:name infinite-error-protection)
+ (enable-debugger)
+ (test-inifinite-error-protection))
-#+sb-thread
-(let ((thread (sb-thread:make-thread #'test-inifinite-error-protection)))
- (loop while (sb-thread:thread-alive-p thread)))
+(with-test (:name (infinite-error-protection :thread)
+ :skipped-on '(not :sb-thread))
+ (enable-debugger)
+ (let ((thread (sb-thread:make-thread #'test-inifinite-error-protection)))
+ (loop while (sb-thread:thread-alive-p thread))))
+;; unconditional, in case either previous left it enabled
(disable-debugger)
+\f
+;;;; test some limitations of MAKE-LISP-OBJ
+
+;;; Older GENCGC systems had a bug in the pointer validation used by
+;;; MAKE-LISP-OBJ that made SIMPLE-FUN objects always fail to
+;;; validate.
+(with-test (:name (make-lisp-obj :simple-funs))
+ (sb-sys:without-gcing
+ (assert (eq #'identity
+ (sb-kernel:make-lisp-obj
+ (sb-kernel:get-lisp-obj-address
+ #'identity))))))
+
+;;; Older CHENEYGC systems didn't perform any real pointer validity
+;;; checks beyond "is this pointer to somewhere in heap space".
+(with-test (:name (make-lisp-obj :pointer-validation))
+ ;; Fun and games: We need to test MAKE-LISP-OBJ with a known-bogus
+ ;; address, but we also need the GC to not pitch a fit if it sees an
+ ;; object with said bogus address. Thus, construct our known-bogus
+ ;; object within an area of unboxed storage (a vector) in static
+ ;; space. We'll make it a simple object, (CONS 0 0), which has an
+ ;; in-memory representation of two consecutive zero words. We
+ ;; allocate a three-word vector so that we can guarantee a
+ ;; double-word aligned double-word of zeros no matter what happens
+ ;; with the vector-data-offset (currently double-word aligned).
+ (let* ((memory (sb-int:make-static-vector 3 :element-type `(unsigned-byte ,sb-vm:n-word-bits)
+ :initial-element 0))
+ (vector-data-address (sb-sys:sap-int (sb-kernel::vector-sap memory)))
+ (object-base-address (logandc2 (+ vector-data-address sb-vm:lowtag-mask) sb-vm:lowtag-mask))
+ (object-tagged-address (+ object-base-address sb-vm:list-pointer-lowtag)))
+ (multiple-value-bind (object valid-p)
+ (sb-kernel:make-lisp-obj object-tagged-address nil)
+ (declare (ignore object))
+ (assert (not valid-p)))))
+
+(defun test-debugger (control form &rest targets)
+ (let ((out (make-string-output-stream))
+ (oops t))
+ (unwind-protect
+ (progn
+ (with-simple-restart (debugger-test-done! "Debugger Test Done!")
+ (let* ((*debug-io* (make-two-way-stream
+ (make-string-input-stream control)
+ (make-broadcast-stream out #+nil *standard-output*)))
+ ;; Initial announcement goes to *ERROR-OUTPUT*
+ (*error-output* *debug-io*)
+ (*invoke-debugger-hook* nil))
+ (handler-bind ((error #'invoke-debugger))
+ (eval form))))
+ (setf oops nil))
+ (when oops
+ (error "Uncontrolled unwind from debugger test.")))
+ ;; For sanity's sake this is outside the *debug-io* rebinding -- otherwise
+ ;; it could swallow our asserts!
+ (with-input-from-string (s (get-output-stream-string out))
+ (loop for line = (read-line s nil)
+ while line
+ do (assert targets)
+ #+nil
+ (format *error-output* "Got: ~A~%" line)
+ (let ((match (pop targets)))
+ (if (eq '* match)
+ ;; Whatever, till the next line matches.
+ (let ((text (pop targets)))
+ (unless (search text line)
+ (push text targets)
+ (push match targets)))
+ (unless (search match line)
+ (format *error-output* "~&Wanted: ~S~% Got: ~S~%" match line)
+ (setf oops t))))))
+ ;; Check that we saw everything we wanted
+ (when targets
+ (error "Missed: ~S" targets))
+ (assert (not oops))))
+
+(with-test (:name (:debugger :source 1))
+ (test-debugger
+ "d
+ source 0
+ debugger-test-done!"
+ `(progn
+ (defun this-will-break (x)
+ (declare (optimize debug))
+ (let* ((y (- x x))
+ (z (/ x y)))
+ (+ x z)))
+ (this-will-break 1))
+ '*
+ "debugger invoked"
+ '*
+ "DIVISION-BY-ZERO"
+ "operands (1 0)"
+ '*
+ "INTEGER-/-INTEGER"
+ "(THIS-WILL-BREAK 1)"
+ "1]"
+ "(/ X Y)"
+ "1]"))
+
+(with-test (:name (:debugger :source 2))
+ (test-debugger
+ "d
+ source 0
+ debugger-test-done!"
+ `(locally (declare (optimize (speed 0) (safety 3) (debug 3)))
+ (let ((f #'(lambda (x cont)
+ (print x (make-broadcast-stream))
+ (if (zerop x)
+ (error "foo")
+ (funcall cont (1- x) cont)))))
+ (funcall f 10 f)))
+ '*
+ "debugger"
+ '*
+ "foo"
+ '*
+ "source: (ERROR \"foo\")"
+ '*
+ "(LAMBDA (X CONT)"
+ '*
+ "(FUNCALL CONT (1- X) CONT)"
+ "1]"))
+
+(with-test (:name (disassemble :high-debug-eval))
+ (eval `(defun this-will-be-disassembled (x)
+ (declare (optimize debug))
+ (+ x x)))
+ (let* ((oopses (make-string-output-stream))
+ (disassembly
+ (let ((*error-output* oopses))
+ (with-output-to-string (*standard-output*)
+ (disassemble 'this-will-be-disassembled)))))
+ (with-input-from-string (s disassembly)
+ (assert (search "; disassembly for THIS-WILL-BE-DISASSEMBLED"
+ (read-line s))))
+ (let ((problems (get-output-stream-string oopses)))
+ (unless (zerop (length problems))
+ (error problems)))))
+
+(defun this-too-will-be-disasssembled (x)
+ (declare (optimize debug))
+ (+ x x))
+
+(with-test (:name (disassemble :high-debug-load))
+ (let* ((oopses (make-string-output-stream))
+ (disassembly
+ (let ((*error-output* oopses))
+ (with-output-to-string (*standard-output*)
+ (disassemble 'this-too-will-be-disasssembled)))))
+ (with-input-from-string (s disassembly)
+ (assert (equal "; disassembly for THIS-TOO-WILL-BE-DISASSSEMBLED"
+ (read-line s))))
+ (let ((problems (get-output-stream-string oopses)))
+ (unless (zerop (length problems))
+ (error problems)))))
+
+(write-line "/debug.impure.lisp done")
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff