1.0.0.32: support for FreeBSD/x86-64

[sbcl.git] / tests / debug.impure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/debug.impure.lisp b/tests/debug.impure.lisp
index ea5d8b7..25ad2a7 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/debug.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/debug.impure.lisp
@@ -119,8 +119,9 @@
 
                         ;; Make sure the backtrace isn't stunted in
                         ;; any way.  (Depends on running in the main
-                        ;; thread.)
-                        (let ((end (last backtrace 2)))
+                        ;; thread.) FIXME: On Windows we get two
+                        ;; extra foreign frames below regular frames.
+                        (let ((end (last backtrace #-win32 2 #+win32 4)))
                           (unless (equal (caar end)
                                          (if *show-entry-point-details*
                                              '(sb-c::tl-xep sb-impl::toplevel-init)
@@ -172,10 +173,10 @@
                    (list '(flet not-optimized))
                    (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized))))))
 
-;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC.  It depended on the
+;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC. It depended on the
 ;;; return function either being before INTEGER-/-INTEGER in memory,
-;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead.  It also depends on
-;;; INTEGER-/-INTEGER calling SIGNED-TRUNCATE.  I believe Raymond Toy
+;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead. It also depends on
+;;; INTEGER-/-INTEGER calling SIGNED-TRUNCATE. I believe Raymond Toy
 ;;; says that the Sparc backend (at least for CMUCL) inlines this, so
 ;;; if SBCL does the same this test is probably not good for the
 ;;; Sparc.
@@ -433,3 +434,5 @@
   (loop while (sb-thread:thread-alive-p thread)))
 
 (disable-debugger)
+
+(write-line "/debug.impure.lisp done")