;;; The debugger doesn't have any native knowledge of the interpreter
(when (eq sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :interpret)
- (sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104))
+ (sb-ext:exit :code 104))
\f
;;;; Check that we get debug arglists right.
+(defvar *p* (namestring *load-truename*))
+
;;; FIXME: This should use some get-argslist like functionality that
;;; we actually export.
;;;
;;; argument of PRINT might be SB-IMPL::OBJECT or SB-KERNEL::OBJ or
;;; whatever. But we do know the general structure that a correct
;;; answer should have, so we can safely do a lot of checks.)
-(destructuring-bind (object-sym &optional-sym stream-sym) (get-arglist #'print)
- (assert (symbolp object-sym))
- (assert (eql &optional-sym '&optional))
- (assert (symbolp stream-sym)))
-(destructuring-bind (dest-sym control-sym &rest-sym format-args-sym)
- (get-arglist #'format)
- (assert (symbolp dest-sym))
- (assert (symbolp control-sym))
- (assert (eql &rest-sym '&rest))
- (assert (symbolp format-args-sym)))
+(with-test (:name :predefined-functions-1)
+ (destructuring-bind (object-sym &optional-sym stream-sym) (get-arglist #'print)
+ (assert (symbolp object-sym))
+ (assert (eql &optional-sym '&optional))
+ (assert (symbolp stream-sym))))
+(with-test (:name :predefined-functions-2)
+ (destructuring-bind (dest-sym control-sym &rest-sym format-args-sym)
+ (get-arglist #'format)
+ (assert (symbolp dest-sym))
+ (assert (symbolp control-sym))
+ (assert (eql &rest-sym '&rest))
+ (assert (symbolp format-args-sym))))
;;; Check for backtraces generally being correct. Ensure that the
;;; actual backtrace finishes (doesn't signal any errors on its own),
;;; and that it contains the frames we expect, doesn't contain any
;;; "bogus stack frame"s, and contains the appropriate toplevel call
;;; and hasn't been cut off anywhere.
-(defun verify-backtrace (test-function frame-specs &key (allow-stunted nil))
+(defun verify-backtrace (test-function frame-specs &key (allow-stunted nil) details)
(labels ((args-equal (want real)
(cond ((eq '&rest (car want))
t)
(handler-bind
((error (lambda (condition)
;; find the part of the backtrace we're interested in
- (let* ((full-backtrace (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list))
- (backtrace (member (caar frame-specs) full-backtrace
- :key #'car
- :test #'equal)))
-
- (setf result condition)
-
- (unless backtrace
- (format t "~&//~S not in backtrace:~% ~S~%"
- (caar frame-specs)
- full-backtrace)
- (setf result nil))
-
- ;; check that we have all the frames we wanted
- (mapcar
- (lambda (spec frame)
- (unless (or (not spec)
- (and (equal (car spec) (car frame))
- (args-equal (cdr spec)
- (cdr frame))))
- (print (list :wanted spec :got frame))
- (setf result nil)))
- frame-specs
- backtrace)
-
- ;; Make sure the backtrace isn't stunted in
- ;; any way. (Depends on running in the main
- ;; thread.) FIXME: On Windows we get two
- ;; extra foreign frames below regular frames.
- (unless (find '(sb-impl::toplevel-init) backtrace
- :test #'equal)
- (print (list :backtrace-stunted backtrace))
- (setf result nil))
- (return-from outer-handler)))))
+ (let (full-backtrace)
+ (sb-debug::map-backtrace
+ (lambda (frame)
+ (multiple-value-bind (name args info)
+ (sb-debug::frame-call frame #+nil #+nil
+ :replace-dynamic-extent-objects t)
+ (if details
+ (push (list (cons name args) info) full-backtrace)
+ (push (cons name args) full-backtrace)))))
+
+ (setf full-backtrace (nreverse full-backtrace))
+ (let ((backtrace (if details
+ (member (caaar frame-specs)
+ full-backtrace
+ :key #'caar
+ :test #'equal)
+ (member (caar frame-specs)
+ full-backtrace
+ :key #'car
+ :test #'equal))))
+
+ (setf result condition)
+
+ (unless backtrace
+ (format t "~&//~S not in backtrace:~% ~S~%"
+ (caar frame-specs)
+ full-backtrace)
+ (setf result nil))
+ ;; check that we have all the frames we wanted
+ (mapcar
+ (lambda (spec frame)
+ (unless (or (not spec)
+ (if details
+ (handler-case
+ (and (args-equal (car spec)
+ (car frame))
+ (equal (cdr spec) (cdr frame)))
+ (error (e)
+ (print (list :spec spec :frame frame))
+ (error e)))
+ (and (equal (car spec) (car frame))
+ (args-equal (cdr spec)
+ (cdr frame)))))
+ (print (list :wanted spec :got frame))
+ (setf result nil)))
+ frame-specs
+ backtrace)
+
+ ;; Make sure the backtrace isn't stunted in
+ ;; any way. (Depends on running in the main
+ ;; thread.) FIXME: On Windows we get two
+ ;; extra foreign frames below regular frames.
+ (unless (find (if details
+ '((sb-impl::toplevel-init) ())
+ '(sb-impl::toplevel-init))
+ backtrace
+ :test #'equal)
+ (print (list :backtrace-stunted backtrace))
+ (setf result nil))
+ (return-from outer-handler))))))
(funcall test-function)))
result)))
(defvar *undefined-function-frame*
;; bug 353
- '(#+(or x86 x86-64) "bogus stack frame"
- #-(or x86 x86-64) "undefined function"))
+ '("undefined function"))
;;; Test for "undefined function" (undefined_tramp) working properly.
;;; Try it with and without tail call elimination, since they can have
(funcall fun)))
(with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-346)
- :fails-on '(or :alpha :ppc :sparc :mips
+ ;; Failures on ALPHA, SPARC, MIPS, and probably
+ ;; HPPA are due to not having a full and valid
+ ;; stack frame for the undefined function frame.
+ ;; See PPC undefined_tramp for details.
+ :fails-on '(or :alpha :sparc :mips
(and :x86-64 :freebsd)))
(assert (verify-backtrace
(lambda () (test #'optimized))
(list *undefined-function-frame*
- (list '(flet test) #'optimized)))))
+ (list `(flet test :in ,*p*) #'optimized)))))
;; bug 353: This test fails at least most of the time for x86/linux
;; ca. 0.8.20.16. -- WHN
- (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-353)
- ;; This used to have fewer :fails-on features pre-0.9.16.38,
- ;; but it turns out that the bug was just being masked by
- ;; the presence of the IR1 stepper instrumentation (and
- ;; is thus again failing now that the instrumentation is
- ;; no more).
- :fails-on '(or :alpha :mips :ppc))
+ (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-353))
(assert (verify-backtrace
(lambda () (test #'not-optimized))
(list *undefined-function-frame*
- (list '(flet not-optimized))
- (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized))))))
+ (list `(flet not-optimized :in ,*p*))
+ (list `(flet test :in ,*p*) #'not-optimized))))))
+
+(with-test (:name :backtrace-interrupted-condition-wait
+ :skipped-on '(not :sb-thread)
+ ;; For some unfathomable reason the backtrace becomes
+ ;; stunted, ending at _sigtramp, when we add :TIMEOUT NIL to
+ ;; the frame we expect. If we leave it out, the backtrace is
+ ;; fine -- but the test fails. I can only boggle right now.
+ :fails-on `(or (and :x86 :linux)
+ :win32))
+ (let ((m (sb-thread:make-mutex))
+ (q (sb-thread:make-waitqueue)))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace
+ (lambda ()
+ (sb-thread:with-mutex (m)
+ (handler-bind ((timeout (lambda (c)
+ (error "foo"))))
+ (with-timeout 0.1
+ (sb-thread:condition-wait q m)))))
+ `((sb-thread:condition-wait ,q ,m :timeout nil))))))
;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC. It depended on the
;;; return function either being before INTEGER-/-INTEGER in memory,
:fails-on :alpha) ; bug 346
(assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized))
(list '(/ 42 &rest)
- (list '(flet test) #'optimized)))))
+ (list `(flet test :in ,*p*) #'optimized)))))
(with-test (:name (:divide-by-zero :bug-356)
:fails-on :alpha) ; bug 356
(assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized))
(list '(/ 42 &rest)
- '((flet not-optimized))
- (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized))))))
+ `((flet not-optimized :in ,*p*))
+ (list `(flet test :in ,*p*) #'not-optimized))))))
(with-test (:name (:throw :no-such-tag)
:fails-on '(or
(throw 'no-such-tag t))
(assert (verify-backtrace #'throw-test '((throw-test))))))
+(defun bug-308926 (x)
+ (let ((v "foo"))
+ (flet ((bar (z)
+ (oops v z)
+ (oops z v)))
+ (bar x)
+ (bar v))))
+
+(with-test (:name :bug-308926)
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-308926 13))
+ '(((flet bar :in bug-308926) 13)
+ (bug-308926 &rest t)))))
+
+;;; Test backtrace through assembly routines
+;;; :bug-800343
+(macrolet ((test (predicate fun
+ &optional (two-arg
+ (find-symbol (format nil "TWO-ARG-~A" fun)
+ "SB-KERNEL")))
+ (let ((test-name (make-symbol (format nil "TEST-~A" fun))))
+ `(flet ((,test-name (x y)
+ ;; make sure it's not in tail position
+ (list (,fun x y))))
+ (with-test (:name (:bug-800343 ,fun))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace
+ (lambda ()
+ (eval `(funcall ,#',test-name 42 t)))
+ '((,two-arg 42 t)
+ #+(or x86 x86-64)
+ ,@(and predicate
+ '(("no debug information for frame")))
+ ((flet ,test-name :in ,*p*) 42 t))))))))
+ (test-predicates (&rest functions)
+ `(progn ,@(mapcar (lambda (function)
+ (if (consp function)
+ `(test t ,@function)
+ `(test t ,function)))
+ functions)))
+ (test-functions (&rest functions)
+ `(progn ,@(mapcar (lambda (function)
+ (if (consp function)
+ `(test nil ,@function)
+ `(test nil ,function)))
+ functions))))
+ (test-predicates = < >)
+ (test-functions + - * /
+ gcd lcm
+ (logand sb-kernel:two-arg-and)
+ (logior sb-kernel:two-arg-ior)
+ (logxor sb-kernel:two-arg-xor)))
+
;;; test entry point handling in backtraces
(defun oops ()
(error "oops"))
+(with-test (:name :xep-too-many-arguments)
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (oops 1 2 3 4 5 6))
+ '((oops ? ? ? ? ? ?)))))
+
(defmacro defbt (n ll &body body)
- `(progn
- ;; normal debug info
- (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.1" n)) ,ll
- ,@body)
- ;; no arguments saved
- (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.2" n)) ,ll
- (declare (optimize (debug 1) (speed 3)))
- ,@body)
- ;; no lambda-list saved
- (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.3" n)) ,ll
- (declare (optimize (debug 0)))
- ,@body)))
+ ;; WTF is this? This is a way to make these tests not depend so much on the
+ ;; details of LOAD/EVAL. Around 1.0.57 we changed %SIMPLE-EVAL to be
+ ;; slightly smarter, which meant that things which used to have xeps
+ ;; suddently had tl-xeps, etc. This takes care of that.
+ `(funcall
+ (compile nil
+ '(lambda ()
+ (progn
+ ;; normal debug info
+ (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.1" n)) ,ll
+ ,@body)
+ ;; no arguments saved
+ (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.2" n)) ,ll
+ (declare (optimize (debug 1) (speed 3)))
+ ,@body)
+ ;; no lambda-list saved
+ (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.3" n)) ,ll
+ (declare (optimize (debug 0)))
+ ,@body))))))
(defbt 1 (&key key)
(list key))
(defbt 5 (&optional (opt (oops)))
(list opt))
-(defmacro with-details (bool &body body)
- `(let ((sb-debug:*show-entry-point-details* ,bool))
- ,@body))
-
(defun bug-354 (x)
(error "XEPs in backtraces: ~S" x))
(with-test (:name :bug-354)
- (with-details t
- (assert (not (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354))
- '((bug-354 &rest)
- ((sb-c::tl-xep bug-354) &rest))))))
+ (assert (not (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354))
+ '((bug-354 354)
+ (((bug-354 &rest) (:tl :external)) 354)))))
(assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354)) '((bug-354 354)))))
;;; FIXME: This test really should be broken into smaller pieces
(with-test (:name (:backtrace :tl-xep))
- (with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring
- '(((sb-c::tl-xep namestring) 0 ?)))))
- (with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring
- '((namestring))))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring
+ '(((namestring) (:tl :external)))
+ :details t))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring
+ '((namestring)))))
(with-test (:name (:backtrace :more-processor))
- (with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key))
- '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.1) &rest))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key))
- '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.2) &rest))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key))
- '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.3) &rest)))))
- (with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key))
- '((bt.1.1 :key))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key))
- '((bt.1.2 &rest))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key))
- '((bt.1.3 &rest))))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key))
+ '(((bt.1.1 :key) (:more :optional)))
+ :details t))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key))
+ '(((bt.1.2 ?) (:more :optional)))
+ :details t))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key))
+ '(((bt.1.3 &rest) (:more :optional)))
+ :details t))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key))
+ '((bt.1.1 :key))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key))
+ '((bt.1.2 &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key))
+ '((bt.1.3 &rest)))))
(with-test (:name (:backtrace :xep))
- (with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1
- '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.1) 0 ?))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2
- '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.2) &rest))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3
- '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.3) &rest)))))
- (with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1
- '((bt.2.1))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2
- '((bt.2.2 &rest))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3
- '((bt.2.3 &rest))))))
-
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1
+ '(((bt.2.1) (:external)))
+ :details t))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2
+ '(((bt.2.2 &rest) (:external)))
+ :details t))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3
+ '(((bt.2.3 &rest) (:external)))
+ :details t))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1
+ '((bt.2.1))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2
+ '((bt.2.2 &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3
+ '((bt.2.3 &rest)))))
+
+;;; This test is somewhat deceptively named. Due to confusion in debug naming
+;;; these functions used to have sb-c::varargs-entry debug names for their
+;;; main lambda.
(with-test (:name (:backtrace :varargs-entry))
- (with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1
- '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.1) :key nil))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2
- '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.2) :key ?))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3
- '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.3) &rest)))))
- (with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1
- '((bt.3.1 :key nil))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2
- '((bt.3.2 :key ?))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3
- '((bt.3.3 &rest))))))
-
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1
+ '((bt.3.1 :key nil))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2
+ '((bt.3.2 :key ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3
+ '((bt.3.3 &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1
+ '((bt.3.1 :key nil))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2
+ '((bt.3.2 :key ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3
+ '((bt.3.3 &rest)))))
+
+;;; This test is somewhat deceptively named. Due to confusion in debug naming
+;;; these functions used to have sb-c::hairy-args-processor debug names for
+;;; their main lambda.
(with-test (:name (:backtrace :hairy-args-processor))
- (with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1
- '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.1) ?))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2
- '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.2) ?))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3
- '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.3) &rest)))))
- (with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1
- '((bt.4.1 ?))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2
- '((bt.4.2 ?))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3
- '((bt.4.3 &rest))))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1
+ '((bt.4.1 ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2
+ '((bt.4.2 ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3
+ '((bt.4.3 &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1
+ '((bt.4.1 ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2
+ '((bt.4.2 ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3
+ '((bt.4.3 &rest)))))
(with-test (:name (:backtrace :optional-processor))
- (with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1
- '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.1)))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2
- '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.2) &rest))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3
- '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.3) &rest)))))
- (with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1
- '((bt.5.1))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2
- '((bt.5.2 &rest))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3
- '((bt.5.3 &rest))))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1
+ '(((bt.5.1) (:optional)))
+ :details t))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2
+ '(((bt.5.2 &rest) (:optional)))
+ :details t))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3
+ '(((bt.5.3 &rest) (:optional)))
+ :details t))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1
+ '((bt.5.1))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2
+ '((bt.5.2 &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3
+ '((bt.5.3 &rest)))))
(write-line "//compile nil")
(defvar *compile-nil-error* (compile nil '(lambda (x) (cons (when x (error "oops")) nil))))
(defvar *compile-nil-non-tc* (compile nil '(lambda (y) (cons (funcall *compile-nil-error* y) nil))))
-(assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (funcall *compile-nil-non-tc* 13))
- '(((lambda (x)) 13)
- ((lambda (y)) 13))))
+(with-test (:name (:compile nil))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (funcall *compile-nil-non-tc* 13))
+ `(((lambda (x) :in ,*p*) 13)
+ ((lambda (y) :in ,*p*) 13)))))
(with-test (:name :clos-slot-typecheckfun-named)
(assert
(assert
(verify-backtrace (lambda ()
(funcall (make-fun 0) 10 11 0))
- '((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0)
+ `((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0)
(/ 10 11 0)
- ((lambda (&rest rest)) 10 11 0))))
+ ((lambda (&rest rest) :in ,*p*) 10 11 0))))
(assert
(verify-backtrace (lambda ()
(funcall (make-fun 1) 10 11 0))
- '((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0)
+ `((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0)
(/ 10 11 0)
- ((lambda (a &rest rest)) 10 11 0))))
+ ((lambda (a &rest rest) :in ,*p*) 10 11 0))))
(assert
(verify-backtrace (lambda ()
(funcall (make-fun 2) 10 11 0))
- '((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0)
+ `((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0)
(/ 10 11 0)
- ((lambda (a b &rest rest)) 10 11 0))))))
+ ((lambda (a b &rest rest) :in ,*p*) 10 11 0))))))
;;;; test TRACE
1
(* n (trace-fact (1- n)))))
-(let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*)
- (trace trace-this)
- (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this)))
- (untrace))))
- (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out))
- (assert (search "returned OK" out)))
+(with-test (:name (trace :simple))
+ (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*)
+ (trace trace-this)
+ (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this)))
+ (untrace))))
+ (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out))
+ (assert (search "returned OK" out))))
;;; bug 379
;;; This is not a WITH-TEST :FAILS-ON PPC DARWIN since there are
(assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out))
(assert (search "returned OK" out))))
-(with-test (:name (trace-recursive :encapsulate nil)
+(with-test (:name (:trace-recursive :encapsulate nil)
:fails-on '(or (and :ppc (not :linux)) :sparc :mips :sunos)
:broken-on '(or :darwin (and :x86 :sunos)))
(let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*)
(load (compile-file "bug-414.lisp"))
(disassemble 'bug-414)))
-(with-test (:name :bug-310175)
- (let ((dx-arg (cons t t)))
+(with-test (:name :bug-310175 :fails-on '(not :stack-allocatable-lists))
+ ;; KLUDGE: Not all DX-enabled platforms DX CONS, and the compiler
+ ;; transforms two-arg-LIST* (and one-arg-LIST) to CONS. Therefore,
+ ;; use two-arg-LIST, which should get through to VOP LIST, and thus
+ ;; stack-allocate on a predictable set of machines.
+ (let ((dx-arg (list t t)))
(declare (dynamic-extent dx-arg))
(flet ((dx-arg-backtrace (x)
(declare (optimize (debug 2)))
- (prog1 (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list 10)
+ (prog1 (sb-debug:list-backtrace :count 10)
(assert (sb-debug::stack-allocated-p x)))))
(declare (notinline dx-arg-backtrace))
(assert (member-if (lambda (frame)
(and (consp frame)
- (equal '(flet dx-arg-backtrace) (car frame))
+ (consp (car frame))
+ (equal '(flet dx-arg-backtrace :in) (butlast (car frame)))
(notany #'sb-debug::stack-allocated-p (cdr frame))))
(dx-arg-backtrace dx-arg))))))
+(with-test (:name :bug-795245)
+ (assert
+ (eq :ok
+ (catch 'done
+ (handler-bind
+ ((error (lambda (e)
+ (declare (ignore e))
+ (handler-case
+ (sb-debug:print-backtrace :count 100
+ :stream (make-broadcast-stream))
+ (error ()
+ (throw 'done :error))
+ (:no-error ()
+ (throw 'done :ok))))))
+ (apply '/= nil 1 2 nil))))))
+
;;;; test infinite error protection
(defmacro nest-errors (n-levels error-form)
(format t "recursive condition: ~A~%" condition) (force-output)
(error "recursive condition: ~A" condition)))
-(defun test-inifinite-error-protection ()
+(defun test-infinite-error-protection ()
;; after 50 successful throws to SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-CATCHER sbcl used
;; to halt, it produces so much garbage that's hard to suppress that
;; it is tested only once
:normal-exit)))))))
(write-line "--END OF H-B-A-B--"))
-(enable-debugger)
-
-(test-inifinite-error-protection)
+(with-test (:name :infinite-error-protection)
+ (enable-debugger)
+ (test-infinite-error-protection))
-#+sb-thread
-(let ((thread (sb-thread:make-thread #'test-inifinite-error-protection)))
- (loop while (sb-thread:thread-alive-p thread)))
+(with-test (:name (:infinite-error-protection :thread)
+ :skipped-on '(not :sb-thread))
+ (enable-debugger)
+ (let ((thread (sb-thread:make-thread #'test-infinite-error-protection)))
+ (loop while (sb-thread:thread-alive-p thread))))
+;; unconditional, in case either previous left it enabled
(disable-debugger)
+\f
+;;;; test some limitations of MAKE-LISP-OBJ
+
+;;; Older GENCGC systems had a bug in the pointer validation used by
+;;; MAKE-LISP-OBJ that made SIMPLE-FUN objects always fail to
+;;; validate.
+(with-test (:name (:make-lisp-obj :simple-funs))
+ (sb-sys:without-gcing
+ (assert (eq #'identity
+ (sb-kernel:make-lisp-obj
+ (sb-kernel:get-lisp-obj-address
+ #'identity))))))
+
+;;; Older CHENEYGC systems didn't perform any real pointer validity
+;;; checks beyond "is this pointer to somewhere in heap space".
+(with-test (:name (:make-lisp-obj :pointer-validation))
+ ;; Fun and games: We need to test MAKE-LISP-OBJ with a known-bogus
+ ;; address, but we also need the GC to not pitch a fit if it sees an
+ ;; object with said bogus address. Thus, construct our known-bogus
+ ;; object within an area of unboxed storage (a vector) in static
+ ;; space. We'll make it a simple object, (CONS 0 0), which has an
+ ;; in-memory representation of two consecutive zero words. We
+ ;; allocate a three-word vector so that we can guarantee a
+ ;; double-word aligned double-word of zeros no matter what happens
+ ;; with the vector-data-offset (currently double-word aligned).
+ (let* ((memory (sb-int:make-static-vector 3 :element-type `(unsigned-byte ,sb-vm:n-word-bits)
+ :initial-element 0))
+ (vector-data-address (sb-sys:sap-int (sb-kernel::vector-sap memory)))
+ (object-base-address (logandc2 (+ vector-data-address sb-vm:lowtag-mask) sb-vm:lowtag-mask))
+ (object-tagged-address (+ object-base-address sb-vm:list-pointer-lowtag)))
+ (multiple-value-bind (object valid-p)
+ (sb-kernel:make-lisp-obj object-tagged-address nil)
+ (declare (ignore object))
+ (assert (not valid-p)))))
+
+(defun test-debugger (control form &rest targets)
+ (let ((out (make-string-output-stream))
+ (oops t))
+ (unwind-protect
+ (progn
+ (with-simple-restart (debugger-test-done! "Debugger Test Done!")
+ (let* ((*debug-io* (make-two-way-stream
+ (make-string-input-stream control)
+ (make-broadcast-stream out #+nil *standard-output*)))
+ ;; Initial announcement goes to *ERROR-OUTPUT*
+ (*error-output* *debug-io*)
+ (*invoke-debugger-hook* nil))
+ (handler-bind ((error #'invoke-debugger))
+ (eval form))))
+ (setf oops nil))
+ (when oops
+ (error "Uncontrolled unwind from debugger test.")))
+ ;; For sanity's sake this is outside the *debug-io* rebinding -- otherwise
+ ;; it could swallow our asserts!
+ (with-input-from-string (s (get-output-stream-string out))
+ (loop for line = (read-line s nil)
+ while line
+ do (assert targets)
+ #+nil
+ (format *error-output* "Got: ~A~%" line)
+ (let ((match (pop targets)))
+ (if (eq '* match)
+ ;; Whatever, till the next line matches.
+ (let ((text (pop targets)))
+ #+nil
+ (format *error-output* "Looking for: ~A~%" text)
+ (unless (search text line)
+ (push text targets)
+ (push match targets)))
+ (unless (search match line)
+ (format *error-output* "~&Wanted: ~S~% Got: ~S~%" match line)
+ (setf oops t))))))
+ ;; Check that we saw everything we wanted
+ (when targets
+ (error "Missed: ~S" targets))
+ (assert (not oops))))
+
+(with-test (:name (:debugger :source 1))
+ (test-debugger
+ "d
+ source 0
+ debugger-test-done!"
+ `(progn
+ (defun this-will-break (x)
+ (declare (optimize debug))
+ (let* ((y (- x x))
+ (z (/ x y)))
+ (+ x z)))
+ (this-will-break 1))
+ '*
+ "debugger invoked"
+ '*
+ "DIVISION-BY-ZERO"
+ "operands (1 0)"
+ '*
+ "INTEGER-/-INTEGER"
+ "(THIS-WILL-BREAK 1)"
+ "1]"
+ "(/ X Y)"
+ "1]"))
+
+(with-test (:name (:debugger :source 2))
+ (test-debugger
+ "d
+ source 0
+ debugger-test-done!"
+ `(locally (declare (optimize (speed 0) (safety 3) (debug 3)))
+ (let ((f #'(lambda (x cont)
+ (print x (make-broadcast-stream))
+ (if (zerop x)
+ (error "~%foo")
+ (funcall cont (1- x) cont)))))
+ (funcall f 10 f)))
+ '*
+ "debugger"
+ '*
+ "foo"
+ '*
+ "source: (ERROR \"~%foo\")"
+ '*
+ "(LAMBDA (X CONT)"
+ '*
+ "(FUNCALL CONT (1- X) CONT)"
+ "1]"))
+
+(with-test (:name (disassemble :high-debug-eval))
+ (eval `(defun this-will-be-disassembled (x)
+ (declare (optimize debug))
+ (+ x x)))
+ (let* ((oopses (make-string-output-stream))
+ (disassembly
+ (let ((*error-output* oopses))
+ (with-output-to-string (*standard-output*)
+ (disassemble 'this-will-be-disassembled)))))
+ (with-input-from-string (s disassembly)
+ (assert (search "; disassembly for THIS-WILL-BE-DISASSEMBLED"
+ (read-line s))))
+ (let ((problems (get-output-stream-string oopses)))
+ (unless (zerop (length problems))
+ (error problems)))))
+
+(defun this-too-will-be-disasssembled (x)
+ (declare (optimize debug))
+ (+ x x))
+
+(with-test (:name (disassemble :high-debug-load))
+ (let* ((oopses (make-string-output-stream))
+ (disassembly
+ (let ((*error-output* oopses))
+ (with-output-to-string (*standard-output*)
+ (disassemble 'this-too-will-be-disasssembled)))))
+ (with-input-from-string (s disassembly)
+ (assert (equal "; disassembly for THIS-TOO-WILL-BE-DISASSSEMBLED"
+ (read-line s))))
+ (let ((problems (get-output-stream-string oopses)))
+ (unless (zerop (length problems))
+ (error problems)))))
+
+(defgeneric gf-dispatch-test/gf (x y)
+ (:method (x y)
+ (+ x y)))
+(defun gf-dispatch-test/f (z)
+ (gf-dispatch-test/gf z))
+
+(with-test (:name :gf-dispatch-backtrace)
+ ;; Fill the cache
+ (gf-dispatch-test/gf 1 1)
+ ;; Wrong argument count
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (gf-dispatch-test/f 42))
+ '(((sb-pcl::gf-dispatch gf-dispatch-test/gf) 42)))))
+
+(with-test (:name (:xep-arglist-clean-up :bug-1192929))
+ (assert
+ (block nil
+ (handler-bind ((error (lambda (e)
+ (declare (ignore e))
+ (return (< (length (car (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list 1))) 10)))))
+ (funcall (compile nil `(lambda (i) (declare ((mod 65536) i)) i)) nil)))))
(write-line "/debug.impure.lisp done")
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff