0.9.16.38:

[sbcl.git] / tests / debug.impure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/debug.impure.lisp b/tests/debug.impure.lisp
index b9709f2..ea5d8b7 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/debug.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/debug.impure.lisp
@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@
 ;;;; more information.
 
 (cl:in-package :cl-user)
+
+;;; The debugger doesn't have any native knowledge of the interpreter
+(when (eq sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :interpret)
+  (sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104))
+
 \f
 ;;;; Check that we get debug arglists right.
 
@@ -38,7 +43,13 @@
     ;; happen to be the two case that I had my nose rubbed in when
     ;; debugging a GC problem caused by applying %SIMPLE-FUN-ARGLIST to
     ;; a closure. -- WHN 2001-06-05)
-    (t :unknown)))
+    (t
+     #+sb-eval
+     (if (typep fun 'sb-eval::interpreted-function)
+         (sb-eval::interpreted-function-lambda-list fun)
+         :unknown)
+     #-sb-eval
+     :unknown)))
 
 (defun zoop (zeep &key beep)
   blurp)
@@ -148,8 +159,13 @@
 
   ;; bug 353: This test fails at least most of the time for x86/linux
   ;; ca. 0.8.20.16. -- WHN
-  (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-356)
-              :fails-on '(or (and :x86 :linux) :alpha))
+  (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-353)
+              ;; This used to have fewer :fails-on features pre-0.9.16.38,
+              ;; but it turns out that the bug was just being masked by
+              ;; the presence of the IR1 stepper instrumentation (and
+              ;; is thus again failing now that the instrumentation is
+              ;; no more).
+              :fails-on '(or :x86 :x86-64 :alpha))
     (assert (verify-backtrace
              (lambda () (test #'not-optimized))
              (list *undefined-function-frame*