;;;; While most of SBCL is derived from the CMU CL system, the test
;;;; files (like this one) were written from scratch after the fork
;;;; from CMU CL.
-;;;;
+;;;;
;;;; This software is in the public domain and is provided with
;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for
;;;; more information.
(cl:in-package :cl-user)
+(load "assertoid.lisp")
+(use-package "ASSERTOID")
+
;;; Until sbcl-0.7.9.x, EVAL was not correctly treating LOCALLY,
;;; MACROLET and SYMBOL-MACROLET, which should preserve top-levelness
;;; of their body forms:
(symbol-macrolet ((foo (symbol-macrolet-bar 1)))
(defmacro symbol-macrolet-bar (x) `(+ ,x 1))
(assert (= foo 2)))
-\f
-;;; success
-(sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104)
-
+;;; Bug reported by Paul Dietz: CONSTANTP on a self-evaluating object
+;;; must return T
+(assert (constantp (find-class 'symbol)))
+(assert (constantp #p""))
+
+;;; More CONSTANTP tests
+;;; form constantp sb-int:constant-form-value
+(dolist (test '((t t t)
+ (x nil)
+ ('x t x)
+ (:keyword t :keyword)
+ (42 t 42)
+ ((if t :ok x) t :ok)
+ ((if t x :no) nil)
+ ((progn
+ (error "oops")
+ t) nil)
+ ((progn 1 2 3) t 3)
+ ((block foo :good) t :good)
+ ((block foo
+ (return-from foo t)) nil)
+ ((progv
+ (list (gensym))
+ '(1)
+ (+ 1)) nil)
+ ((progv
+ '(x)
+ (list (random 2))
+ x) nil)
+ ((progv
+ '(x)
+ '(1)
+ (1+ x)) t 2)
+ ((progv '(x) '(t)
+ (if x 1 2)) t 1)
+ ((unwind-protect 1 nil) t 1)
+ ((unwind-protect 1
+ (xxx)) nil)
+ ((the integer 1) t 1)
+ ((the integer (+ 1 1)) t 2)
+ ((the integer (foo)) nil)
+ ((+ 1 2) t 3)))
+ (destructuring-bind (form c &optional v) test
+ (assert (eql (constantp form) c))
+ (when c
+ (assert (eql v (sb-int:constant-form-value form))))))
+
+;;; DEFPARAMETER must assign a dynamic variable
+(let ((var (gensym)))
+ (assert (equal (eval `(list (let ((,var 1))
+ (defparameter ,var 2)
+ ,var)
+ ,var))
+ '(1 2))))
+
+;;; Bug 264: SYMBOL-MACROLET did not check for a bound SPECIAL
+;;; declaration
+(assert (raises-error? (progv '(foo) '(1)
+ (eval '(symbol-macrolet ((foo 3))
+ (declare (special foo))
+ foo)))
+ error))
+
+;;; MAKE-PACKAGE (and other &key functions) should signal an error
+;;; when given a NIL key. This is kind of a compiler test really, but
+;;; this'll do as a resting place.
+(handler-case
+ (eval '(make-package "FOO" nil nil))
+ (error () :ok)
+ (:no-error (c) (error "MAKE-PACKAGE succeeded: ~S" c)))
+
+;;; FUNCTION
+(defun function-eq-test ()
+ 'ok)
+(trace function-eq-test)
+(assert (eq (eval '(function function-eq-test))
+ (funcall (compile nil '(lambda () (function function-eq-test))))))
+
+;;; No extra output, please
+(assert (equal ".."
+ (with-output-to-string (*standard-output*)
+ (eval '(progn (princ ".") (let ((x 42)) t) (princ "."))))))
+
+;;; success