1.0.31.27: RUN-PROGRAM process group change

[sbcl.git] / tests / eval.impure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/eval.impure.lisp b/tests/eval.impure.lisp
index da75fb0..c79066a 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/eval.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/eval.impure.lisp
@@ -188,4 +188,65 @@
                (with-output-to-string (*standard-output*)
                  (eval '(progn (princ ".") (let ((x 42)) t) (princ "."))))))
 
+;;; IF
+(defun true () t)
+(defun false () nil)
+(defmacro oops () (throw :oops (list)))
+(defun test-eval (ok form) (assert (eq ok (catch :oops (eval form)))))
+(test-eval t '(if (false) (oops) t))
+(test-eval t '(if (true) t (oops)))
+(test-eval nil '(if (not (if (false) t)) (oops)))
+
+;;; TAGBODY
+
+;;; As of SBCL 1.0.1.8, TAGBODY should not accept duplicate go tags,
+;;; yet choked on two duplicate tags.  Note that this test asserts a
+;;; failure.
+(with-test (:name :tagbody-dual-go-tags)
+  (progn
+    (defun tagbody-dual-go-tags ()
+      (restart-case
+          (handler-bind ((error (lambda (c)
+                                  (declare (ignore c))
+                                  (invoke-restart 'NOT-AN-ERROR))))
+            (tagbody :A :A) nil)
+        (NOT-AN-ERROR () t)))
+    (assert (tagbody-dual-go-tags))))
+
+;;; Ensure that NIL is a valid go tag.
+(with-test (:name :tagbody-nil-is-valid-tag)
+  (progn
+    (defun tagbody-nil-is-valid-tag ()
+      (tagbody (go NIL) NIL) t)
+    (assert (tagbody-nil-is-valid-tag))))
+
+;;; top-level DECLARE is formally undefined, but we want it to raise
+;;; an error rather than silently return NIL.
+(defvar *scratch*)
+(with-test (:name :toplevel-declare)
+  (assert (raises-error? (eval '(declare (type pathname *scratch*))))))
+
+(with-test (:name (eval no-compiler-notes))
+  (handler-bind ((sb-ext:compiler-note #'error))
+    (let ((sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :compile))
+      (eval '(let ((x 42))
+              (if nil x)))
+      (eval '(let ((* 13))
+              (let ((x 42)
+                    (y *))
+                (declare (optimize speed))
+                (+ x y)))))))
+
+(with-test (:name :bug-238)
+  (let ((sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :compile))
+    (handler-bind ((sb-ext:compiler-note #'error))
+      (eval '(defclass bug-238 () ()))
+      (eval '(defmethod bug-238 ((x bug-238) (bug-238 bug-238))
+              (call-next-method)))
+      (eval '(handler-case
+              (with-input-from-string (*query-io* "    no")
+                (yes-or-no-p))
+              (simple-type-error () 'error)))
+      t)))
+
 ;;; success