(with-output-to-string (*standard-output*)
(eval '(progn (princ ".") (let ((x 42)) t) (princ "."))))))
+;;; IF
+(defun true () t)
+(defun false () nil)
+(defmacro oops () (throw :oops (list)))
+(defun test-eval (ok form) (assert (eq ok (catch :oops (eval form)))))
+(test-eval t '(if (false) (oops) t))
+(test-eval t '(if (true) t (oops)))
+(test-eval nil '(if (not (if (false) t)) (oops)))
+
+;;; TAGBODY
+
+;;; As of SBCL 1.0.1.8, TAGBODY should not accept duplicate go tags,
+;;; yet choked on two duplicate tags. Note that this test asserts a
+;;; failure.
+(with-test (:name :tagbody-dual-go-tags)
+ (progn
+ (defun tagbody-dual-go-tags ()
+ (restart-case
+ (handler-bind ((error (lambda (c)
+ (declare (ignore c))
+ (invoke-restart 'NOT-AN-ERROR))))
+ (tagbody :A :A) nil)
+ (NOT-AN-ERROR () t)))
+ (assert (tagbody-dual-go-tags))))
+
+;;; Ensure that NIL is a valid go tag.
+(with-test (:name :tagbody-nil-is-valid-tag)
+ (progn
+ (defun tagbody-nil-is-valid-tag ()
+ (tagbody (go NIL) NIL) t)
+ (assert (tagbody-nil-is-valid-tag))))
+
+;;; top-level DECLARE is formally undefined, but we want it to raise
+;;; an error rather than silently return NIL.
+(defvar *scratch*)
+(with-test (:name :toplevel-declare)
+ (assert (raises-error? (eval '(declare (type pathname *scratch*))))))
+
+(with-test (:name (eval :no-compiler-notes))
+ (handler-bind ((sb-ext:compiler-note #'error))
+ (let ((sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :compile))
+ (eval '(let ((x 42))
+ (if nil x)))
+ (eval '(let ((* 13))
+ (let ((x 42)
+ (y *))
+ (declare (optimize speed))
+ (+ x y)))))))
+
+(with-test (:name :bug-238)
+ (let ((sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :compile))
+ (handler-bind ((sb-ext:compiler-note #'error))
+ (eval '(defclass bug-238 () ()))
+ (eval '(defmethod bug-238 ((x bug-238) (bug-238 bug-238))
+ (call-next-method)))
+ (eval '(handler-case
+ (with-input-from-string (*query-io* " no")
+ (yes-or-no-p))
+ (simple-type-error () 'error)))
+ t)))
+
+(with-test (:name :bug-524707 :skipped-on '(not :sb-eval))
+ (let ((*evaluator-mode* :interpret)
+ (lambda-form '(lambda (x) (declare (fixnum x)) (1+ x))))
+ (let ((fun (eval lambda-form)))
+ (assert (equal lambda-form (function-lambda-expression fun))))))
+
+(with-test (:name (eval :source-context-in-compiler))
+ (let ((noise (with-output-to-string (*error-output*)
+ (let ((*evaluator-mode* :compile))
+ (eval `(defun source-context-test (x) y))))))
+ (with-input-from-string (s noise)
+ (assert (equal "; in: DEFUN SOURCE-CONTEXT-TEST" (read-line s))))))
+
+(with-test (:name (eval :empty-let-is-not-toplevel))
+ (let ((sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :compile))
+ (eval `(let ()
+ (defmacro empty-let-is-not-toplevel-x () :macro)
+ (defun empty-let-is-not-toplevel-fun ()
+ (empty-let-is-not-toplevel-x))))
+ (eval `(defun empty-let-is-not-toplevel-x () :fun))
+ (assert (eq :fun (empty-let-is-not-toplevel-fun))))
+ ;; While at it, test that we get the late binding under
+ ;; interpreter mode.
+ #+sb-eval
+ (let ((sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :interpret))
+ (eval `(let ()
+ (defmacro empty-let-is-not-toplevel-x () :macro)
+ (defun empty-let-is-not-toplevel-fun ()
+ (empty-let-is-not-toplevel-x))))
+ (assert (eq :macro (empty-let-is-not-toplevel-fun)))
+ (eval `(defun empty-let-is-not-toplevel-x () :fun))
+ (assert (eq :fun (empty-let-is-not-toplevel-fun)))))
+
+(with-test (:name (eval function-lambda-expression))
+ (assert (equal `(sb-int:named-lambda eval-fle-1 (x)
+ (block eval-fle-1
+ (+ x 1)))
+ (function-lambda-expression
+ (eval `(progn
+ (defun eval-fle-1 (x) (+ x 1))
+ #'eval-fle-1)))))
+ (assert (equal `(lambda (x y z) (+ x 1 y z))
+ (function-lambda-expression
+ (eval `(lambda (x y z) (+ x 1 y z)))))))
+
;;; success
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff