1.0.3.23: fix sb-posix timeval struct

[sbcl.git] / tests / float.pure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/float.pure.lisp b/tests/float.pure.lisp
index bf91142..5685131 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/float.pure.lisp
+++ b/tests/float.pure.lisp
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
 (assert (= 0.0d0 (scale-float 1.0d0 (1- most-negative-fixnum))))
 
 (with-test (:name (:scale-float-overflow :bug-372)
-            :fails-on '(or :ppc)) ;; bug 372
+            :fails-on '(or :ppc :darwin)) ;; bug 372
   (progn
     (assert (raises-error? (scale-float 1.0 most-positive-fixnum)
                            floating-point-overflow))
@@ -118,12 +118,61 @@
    #c(1.0d0 2.0d0))
     'double-float))
 
+;;; More out of line functions (%COS, %SIN, %TAN) for constant folding,
+;;; reported by Mika Pihlajamäki
+(funcall (compile nil '(lambda () (cos (tan (round 0))))))
+(funcall (compile nil '(lambda () (sin (tan (round 0))))))
+(funcall (compile nil '(lambda () (tan (tan (round 0))))))
+
 (with-test (:name (:addition-overflow :bug-372)
-            :fails-on '(or :ppc))
+            :fails-on '(or :ppc :darwin :mips))
   (assert (typep (nth-value
                   1
                   (ignore-errors
                     (sb-sys:without-interrupts
                      (loop repeat 2 summing most-positive-double-float)
                      (sleep 2))))
-                 'floating-point-overflow)))
\ No newline at end of file
+                 'floating-point-overflow)))
+
+;;; On x86-64 generating complex floats on the stack failed an aver in
+;;; the compiler if the stack slot was the same as the one containing
+;;; the real part of the complex. The following expression was able to
+;;; trigger this in 0.9.5.62.
+(with-test (:name :complex-float-stack)
+  (dolist (type '((complex double-float)
+                  (complex single-float)))
+    (compile nil
+             `(lambda (x0 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7)
+                (declare (type ,type x0 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7))
+                (let ((x0 (+ x0 x0))
+                      (x1 (+ x1 x1))
+                      (x2 (+ x2 x2))
+                      (x3 (+ x3 x3))
+                      (x4 (+ x4 x4))
+                      (x5 (+ x5 x5))
+                      (x6 (+ x6 x6))
+                      (x7 (+ x7 x7)))
+                  (* (+ x0 x1 x2 x3) (+ x4 x5 x6 x7)
+                     (+ x0 x2 x4 x6) (+ x1 x3 x5 x7)
+                     (+ x0 x3 x4 x7) (+ x1 x2 x5 x6)
+                     (+ x0 x1 x6 x7) (+ x2 x3 x4 x5)))))))
+
+(with-test (:name :nan-comparisons)
+  (sb-int:with-float-traps-masked (:invalid)
+    (macrolet ((test (form)
+                 (let ((nform (subst '(/ 0.0 0.0) 'nan form)))
+                   `(progn
+                      (assert (not (eval ',nform)))
+                      (assert (not (funcall (lambda () ,nform))))))))
+      ;; Source transforms for >= and <= used to be too eager about
+      ;; inverting the test, causing NaN issues.
+      (test (>= nan 1.0))
+      (test (>= 1.0 nan))
+      (test (>= 1.0 nan 0.0))
+      (test (>= 1.0 0.0 nan))
+      (test (>= nan 1.0 0.0))
+      (test (<= nan 1.0))
+      (test (<= 1.0 nan))
+      (test (<= 1.0 nan 2.0))
+      (test (<= 1.0 2.0 nan))
+      (test (<= nan 1.0 2.0)))))