(assert (= 0.0 (scale-float 1.0 most-negative-fixnum)))
(assert (= 0.0d0 (scale-float 1.0d0 (1- most-negative-fixnum))))
-(with-test (:fails-on '(or :darwin)) ;; bug 372
+(with-test (:name (:scale-float-overflow :bug-372)
+ :fails-on '(or :ppc)) ;; bug 372
(progn
(assert (raises-error? (scale-float 1.0 most-positive-fixnum)
floating-point-overflow))
#c(1.0d0 2.0d0))
'double-float))
-(assert (typep (nth-value
- 1
- (ignore-errors
- (sb-sys:without-interrupts
- (loop repeat 2 summing most-positive-double-float)
- (sleep 2))))
- 'floating-point-overflow))
+(with-test (:name (:addition-overflow :bug-372)
+ :fails-on '(or :ppc :mips))
+ (assert (typep (nth-value
+ 1
+ (ignore-errors
+ (sb-sys:without-interrupts
+ (loop repeat 2 summing most-positive-double-float)
+ (sleep 2))))
+ 'floating-point-overflow)))
+
+;;; On x86-64 generating complex floats on the stack failed an aver in
+;;; the compiler if the stack slot was the same as the one containing
+;;; the real part of the complex. The following expression was able to
+;;; trigger this in 0.9.5.62.
+(with-test (:name :complex-float-stack)
+ (dolist (type '((complex double-float)
+ (complex single-float)))
+ (compile nil
+ `(lambda (x0 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7)
+ (declare (type ,type x0 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7))
+ (let ((x0 (+ x0 x0))
+ (x1 (+ x1 x1))
+ (x2 (+ x2 x2))
+ (x3 (+ x3 x3))
+ (x4 (+ x4 x4))
+ (x5 (+ x5 x5))
+ (x6 (+ x6 x6))
+ (x7 (+ x7 x7)))
+ (* (+ x0 x1 x2 x3) (+ x4 x5 x6 x7)
+ (+ x0 x2 x4 x6) (+ x1 x3 x5 x7)
+ (+ x0 x3 x4 x7) (+ x1 x2 x5 x6)
+ (+ x0 x1 x6 x7) (+ x2 x3 x4 x5)))))))