+;;;; tests for problems in the interface presented to the user/programmer
+
;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for
;;;; more information.
;;;;
;;;; more information.
(in-package :cl-user)
-
-;;; Check for fbound external symbols in public packages that have no
-;;; argument list information. (This can happen if we get carried away
-;;; with byte compilation, since at least in sbcl-0.6.12 the byte
-;;; compiler can't record argument list information.)
-(defvar *public-package-names*
- '("SB-ALIEN" "SB-C-CALL" "SB-DEBUG" "SB-EXT" "SB-GRAY" "SB-MP"
- "SB-PROFILE" "SB-PCL" "COMMON-LISP"))
-(defun has-arglist-info-p (function)
- (declare (type function function))
- ;; The Lisp-level type FUNCTION can conceal a multitude of sins..
- (case (sb-kernel:get-type function)
- ((#.sb-vm:function-header-type #.sb-vm:closure-function-header-type)
- (sb-kernel:%function-arglist function))
- (#.sb-vm:closure-header-type (has-arglist-info-p
- (sb-kernel:%closure-function
- function)))
- ;; in code/describe.lisp, ll. 227 (%describe-function), we use a scheme
- ;; like above, and it seems to work. -- MNA 2001-06-12
- ;;
- ;; (There might be other cases with arglist info also.
- ;; FUNCTION-HEADER-TYPE and CLOSURE-HEADER-TYPE just
- ;; happen to be the two case that I had my nose rubbed in when
- ;; debugging a GC problem caused by applying %FUNCTION-ARGLIST to
- ;; a closure. -- WHN 2001-06-05)
- (t nil)))
-(defun check-ext-symbols-arglist (package)
- (format t "~% looking at package: ~A" package)
- (do-external-symbols (ext-sym package)
- (when (fboundp ext-sym)
- (let ((fun (symbol-function ext-sym)))
- (cond ((macro-function ext-sym)
- ;; FIXME: Macro functions should have their argument list
- ;; information checked separately. Just feeding them into
- ;; the ordinary-function logic below doesn't work right,
- ;; though, and I haven't figured out what does work
- ;; right. For now we just punt.
- (values))
- #+nil
- ((sb-int:info :function :accessor-for ext-sym)
- (values))
- ((typep fun 'generic-function)
- (sb-pcl::generic-function-pretty-arglist fun))
- (t
- (let ((fun (symbol-function ext-sym)))
- (unless (has-arglist-info-p fun)
- (error "Function ~A has no arg-list information available."
- ext-sym)))))))))
-(dolist (public-package *public-package-names*)
- (when (find-package public-package)
- (check-ext-symbols-arglist public-package)))
-(terpri)
+\f
+;;;; properties of symbols, e.g. presence of doc strings for public symbols
;;; FIXME: It would probably be good to require here that every
;;; external symbol either has a doc string or has some good excuse
;;; (like being an accessor for a structure which has a doc string).
+\f
+;;;; tests of interface machinery
+
+;;; APROPOS should accept a package designator, not just a package, and
+;;; furthermore do the right thing when it gets a package designator.
+;;; (bug reported and fixed by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2001-10-17)
+(assert (< 0
+ (length (apropos-list "PRINT" :cl))
+ (length (apropos-list "PRINT"))))
+\f
+;;; DESCRIBE shouldn't fail on rank-0 arrays (bug reported and fixed
+;;; by Lutz Euler sbcl-devel 2002-12-03)
+(describe #0a0)
+(describe #(1 2 3))
+(describe #2a((1 2) (3 4)))
+
+;;; TYPEP, SUBTYPEP, UPGRADED-ARRAY-ELEMENT-TYPE and
+;;; UPGRADED-COMPLEX-PART-TYPE should be able to deal with NIL as an
+;;; environment argument
+(typep 1 'fixnum nil)
+(subtypep 'fixnum 'integer nil)
+(upgraded-array-element-type '(mod 5) nil)
+(upgraded-complex-part-type '(single-float 0.0 1.0) nil)
-(print "done with interface.pure.lisp")
+;;; We should have documentation for our extension package:
+(assert (documentation (find-package "SB-EXT") t))
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff