;;;; While most of SBCL is derived from the CMU CL system, the test
;;;; files (like this one) were written from scratch after the fork
;;;; from CMU CL.
-;;;;
+;;;;
;;;; This software is in the public domain and is provided with
;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for
;;;; more information.
(in-package :cl-user)
+
+(load "test-util.lisp")
+(load "compiler-test-util.lisp")
+(use-package :test-util)
\f
;;;; properties of symbols, e.g. presence of doc strings for public symbols
-;;; Check for fbound external symbols in public packages that have no
-;;; argument list information. (This used to be possible when we got
-;;; carried away with byte compilation, since the byte compiler can't
-;;; record argument list information. Now that there's no byte
-;;; compiler, that can't happen, but it still shouldn't hurt to check
-;;; in case the argument information goes astray some other way.)
-(defvar *public-package-names*
- '("SB-ALIEN" "SB-C-CALL" "SB-DEBUG" "SB-EXT" "SB-GRAY" "SB-MP"
- "SB-PROFILE" "SB-PCL" "COMMON-LISP"))
-(defun has-arglist-info-p (fun)
- (declare (type function fun))
- ;; The Lisp-level type FUNCTION can conceal a multitude of sins..
- (case (sb-kernel:get-type fun)
- ((#.sb-vm:simple-fun-header-widetag #.sb-vm:closure-fun-header-widetag)
- (sb-kernel:%simple-fun-arglist fun))
- (#.sb-vm:closure-header-widetag (has-arglist-info-p
- (sb-kernel:%closure-fun fun)))
- ;; In code/describe.lisp, ll. 227 (%describe-function), we use a scheme
- ;; like above, and it seems to work. -- MNA 2001-06-12
- ;;
- ;; (There might be other cases with arglist info also.
- ;; SIMPLE-FUN-HEADER-WIDETAG and CLOSURE-HEADER-WIDETAG just
- ;; happen to be the two case that I had my nose rubbed in when
- ;; debugging a GC problem caused by applying %SIMPLE-FUN-ARGLIST to
- ;; a closure. -- WHN 2001-06-05)
- (t nil)))
-(defun check-ext-symbols-arglist (package)
- (format t "~% looking at package: ~A" package)
- (do-external-symbols (ext-sym package)
- (when (fboundp ext-sym)
- (let ((fun (symbol-function ext-sym)))
- (cond ((macro-function ext-sym)
- ;; FIXME: Macro functions should have their argument list
- ;; information checked separately. Just feeding them into
- ;; the ordinary-function logic below doesn't work right,
- ;; though, and I haven't figured out what does work
- ;; right. For now we just punt.
- (values))
- ((typep fun 'generic-function)
- (sb-pcl::generic-function-pretty-arglist fun))
- (t
- (let ((fun (symbol-function ext-sym)))
- (unless (has-arglist-info-p fun)
- (error "Function ~A has no arg-list information available."
- ext-sym)))))))))
-(dolist (public-package *public-package-names*)
- (when (find-package public-package)
- (check-ext-symbols-arglist public-package)))
-(terpri)
-
;;; FIXME: It would probably be good to require here that every
;;; external symbol either has a doc string or has some good excuse
;;; (like being an accessor for a structure which has a doc string).
;;; furthermore do the right thing when it gets a package designator.
;;; (bug reported and fixed by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2001-10-17)
(assert (< 0
- (length (apropos-list "PRINT" :cl))
- (length (apropos-list "PRINT"))))
+ (length (apropos-list "PRINT" :cl))
+ (length (apropos-list "PRINT"))))
+;;; Further, it should correctly deal with the external-only flag (bug
+;;; reported by cliini on #lisp IRC 2003-05-30, fixed in sbcl-0.8.0.1x
+;;; by CSR)
+(assert (= (length (apropos-list "" "CL"))
+ (length (apropos-list "" "CL" t))))
+(assert (< 0
+ (length (apropos-list "" "SB-VM" t))
+ (length (apropos-list "" "SB-VM"))))
+\f
+;;; DESCRIBE shouldn't fail on rank-0 arrays (bug reported and fixed
+;;; by Lutz Euler sbcl-devel 2002-12-03)
+(describe #0a0)
+(describe #(1 2 3))
+(describe #2a((1 2) (3 4)))
+
+;;; TYPEP, SUBTYPEP, UPGRADED-ARRAY-ELEMENT-TYPE and
+;;; UPGRADED-COMPLEX-PART-TYPE should be able to deal with NIL as an
+;;; environment argument
+(typep 1 'fixnum nil)
+(subtypep 'fixnum 'integer nil)
+(upgraded-array-element-type '(mod 5) nil)
+(upgraded-complex-part-type '(single-float 0.0 1.0) nil)
+
+;;; We should have documentation for our extension package:
+(assert (documentation (find-package "SB-EXT") t))
+
+;;; DECLARE should not be a special operator
+(assert (not (special-operator-p 'declare)))
+
+;;; WITH-TIMEOUT should accept more than one form in its body.
+(with-test (:name :with-timeout-forms)
+ (handler-bind ((sb-ext:timeout #'continue))
+ (sb-ext:with-timeout 3
+ (sleep 2)
+ (sleep 2))))
+
+;;; SLEEP should not cons
+(with-test (:name (sleep :non-consing) :fails-on '(or (not :x86-64) :win32))
+ (ctu:assert-no-consing (sleep 0.00001)))
+
+;;; SLEEP should work with large integers as well -- no timers
+;;; on win32, so don't test there.
+(with-test (:name (sleep pretty-much-forever) :skipped-on :win32)
+ (assert (eq :timeout
+ (handler-case
+ (sb-ext:with-timeout 1
+ (sleep (ash 1 (* 2 sb-vm:n-word-bits))))
+ (sb-ext:timeout ()
+ :timeout)))))
+
+;;; DOCUMENTATION should return nil, not signal slot-unbound
+(documentation 'fixnum 'type)
+(documentation 'class 'type)
+(documentation (find-class 'class) 'type)
+(documentation 'foo 'structure)
+
+;;; DECODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME should accept second-resolution time-zones.
+(macrolet ((test (ut time-zone list)
+ (destructuring-bind (sec min hr date mon yr day tz)
+ list
+ `(multiple-value-bind (sec min hr date mon yr day dst tz)
+ (decode-universal-time ,ut ,time-zone)
+ (declare (ignore dst))
+ (assert (= sec ,sec))
+ (assert (= min ,min))
+ (assert (= hr ,hr))
+ (assert (= date ,date))
+ (assert (= mon ,mon))
+ (assert (= yr ,yr))
+ (assert (= day ,day))
+ (assert (= tz ,tz))))))
+ (test (* 86400 365) -1/3600 (1 0 0 1 1 1901 1 -1/3600))
+ (test (* 86400 365) 0 (0 0 0 1 1 1901 1 0))
+ (test (* 86400 365) 1/3600 (59 59 23 31 12 1900 0 1/3600)))
+
+;;; DECODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME shouldn't fail when the time is outside UNIX
+;;; 32-bit time_t and a timezone wasn't passed
+(decode-universal-time 0 nil)
+
+;;; ENCODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME should be able to encode the universal time
+;;; 0 when passed a representation in a timezone where the
+;;; representation of 0 as a decoded time is in 1899.
+(encode-universal-time 0 0 23 31 12 1899 1)
+
+;;; DISASSEMBLE shouldn't fail on purified functions
+(disassemble 'cl:+)
+(disassemble 'sb-ext:run-program)
+
+;;; minimal test of GC: see stress-gc.{sh,lisp} for a more
+;;; comprehensive test.
+(loop repeat 2
+ do (compile nil '(lambda (x) x))
+ do (sb-ext:gc :full t))
+
+;;; On x86-64, the instruction definitions for CMP*[PS][SD] were broken
+;;; so that the disassembler threw an error when they were used with
+;;; one operand in memory.
+(with-test (:name :bug-814702)
+ (disassemble (lambda (x)
+ (= #C(2.0f0 3.0f0)
+ (the (complex single-float) x))))
+ (disassemble (lambda (x y)
+ (= (the (complex single-float) x)
+ (the (complex single-float) y)))))