0.pre7.127:

[sbcl.git] / tests / interface.pure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/interface.pure.lisp b/tests/interface.pure.lisp
index 6febe33..858ee3f 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/interface.pure.lisp
+++ b/tests/interface.pure.lisp
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+;;;; tests for problems in the interface presented to the user/programmer
+
 ;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for
 ;;;; more information.
 ;;;;
@@ -10,6 +12,8 @@
 ;;;; more information.
 
 (in-package :cl-user)
+\f
+;;;; properties of symbols, e.g. presence of doc strings for public symbols
 
 ;;; Check for fbound external symbols in public packages that have no
 ;;; argument list information. (This used to be possible when we got
@@ -23,12 +27,12 @@
 (defun has-arglist-info-p (fun)
   (declare (type function fun))
   ;; The Lisp-level type FUNCTION can conceal a multitude of sins..
-  (case (sb-kernel:get-type fun)
+  (case (sb-kernel:widetag-of fun)
     ((#.sb-vm:simple-fun-header-widetag #.sb-vm:closure-fun-header-widetag)
       (sb-kernel:%simple-fun-arglist fun))
     (#.sb-vm:closure-header-widetag (has-arglist-info-p
                                     (sb-kernel:%closure-fun fun)))
-    ;; In code/describe.lisp, ll. 227 (%describe-function), we use a scheme
+    ;; In code/describe.lisp, ll. 227 (%describe-fun), we use a scheme
     ;; like above, and it seems to work. -- MNA 2001-06-12
     ;;
     ;; (There might be other cases with arglist info also.
@@ -64,3 +68,12 @@
 ;;; FIXME: It would probably be good to require here that every
 ;;; external symbol either has a doc string or has some good excuse
 ;;; (like being an accessor for a structure which has a doc string).
+\f
+;;;; tests of interface machinery
+
+;;; APROPOS should accept a package designator, not just a package, and
+;;; furthermore do the right thing when it gets a package designator.
+;;; (bug reported and fixed by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2001-10-17)
+(assert (< 0
+          (length (apropos-list "PRINT" :cl))
+          (length (apropos-list "PRINT"))))