0.8.5.29:

[sbcl.git] / tests / mop.impure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/mop.impure.lisp b/tests/mop.impure.lisp
index 9f2e9e5..d5116f9 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/mop.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/mop.impure.lisp
@@ -146,5 +146,29 @@
 (defvar *automethod-object* (make-instance 'automethod-object))
 (assert (typep *automethod-object* 'automethod-object))
 \f
+;;; COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-SLOT-DEFINITION should take three arguments, one
+;;; of which is the name of the slot.
+(defvar *compute-effective-slot-definition-count* 0)
+(defmethod compute-effective-slot-definition :before
+    (class (name (eql 'foo)) dsds)
+  (incf *compute-effective-slot-definition-count*))
+(defclass cesd-test-class ()
+  ((foo :initarg :foo)))
+(make-instance 'cesd-test-class :foo 3)
+;;; FIXME: this assertion seems a little weak.  I don't know why
+;;; COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-SLOT-DEFINITION gets called twice in this
+;;; sequence, nor whether that's compliant with AMOP.  -- CSR,
+;;; 2003-04-17
+(assert (> *compute-effective-slot-definition-count* 0))
+\f
+;;; this used to cause a nasty uncaught metacircularity in PCL.
+(defclass substandard-method (standard-method) ())
+(defgeneric substandard-defgeneric (x y)
+  (:method-class substandard-method)
+  (:method ((x number) (y number)) (+ x y))
+  (:method ((x string) (y string)) (concatenate 'string x y)))
+(assert (= (substandard-defgeneric 1 2) 3))
+(assert (string= (substandard-defgeneric "1" "2") "12"))
+\f
 ;;;; success
 (sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104)