0.8.10.25:

[sbcl.git] / tests / mop.impure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/mop.impure.lisp b/tests/mop.impure.lisp
index e446bff..d5116f9 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/mop.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/mop.impure.lisp
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
 ;;; that it is at least possible to define classes with that as a
 ;;; metaclass.
 (defclass gf-class (standard-generic-function) ()
-  (:metaclass sb-pcl::funcallable-standard-class))
+  (:metaclass funcallable-standard-class))
 (defgeneric g (a b c)
   (:generic-function-class gf-class))
 \f
@@ -109,15 +109,15 @@
 ;;; of all built-in-classes is of the relevant type)
 (assert (null (class-prototype (find-class 'null))))
 \f
-;;; simple consistency checks for the SB-PCL (perhaps AKA SB-MOP)
-;;; package: all of the functionality specified in AMOP is in
-;;; functions:
-(assert (null (loop for x being each external-symbol in "SB-PCL"
-                   unless (fboundp x) collect x)))
-;;; and all generic functions in SB-PCL have at least one specified
+;;; simple consistency checks for the SB-MOP package: all of the
+;;; functionality specified in AMOP is in functions and classes:
+(assert (null (loop for x being each external-symbol in "SB-MOP"
+                   unless (or (fboundp x) (find-class x)) collect x)))
+;;; and all generic functions in SB-MOP have at least one specified
 ;;; method, except for UPDATE-DEPENDENT
-(assert (null (loop for x being each external-symbol in "SB-PCL"
-                   unless (or (eq x 'update-dependent)
+(assert (null (loop for x being each external-symbol in "SB-MOP"
+                   unless (or (not (fboundp x))
+                              (eq x 'update-dependent)
                               (not (typep (fdefinition x) 'generic-function))
                               (> (length (generic-function-methods
                                           (fdefinition x)))
@@ -134,5 +134,41 @@
 (assert (null *e-c-u-c-arg-order*))
 (defclass e-c-u-c-arg-order () ())
 (assert (eq *e-c-u-c-arg-order* t))
+\f
+;;; verify that FIND-CLASS works after FINALIZE-INHERITANCE
+(defclass automethod-class (standard-class) ())
+(defmethod validate-superclass ((c1 automethod-class) (c2 standard-class))
+  t)
+(defmethod finalize-inheritance :after ((x automethod-class))
+  (format t "~&~S ~S~%" x (find-class (class-name x))))
+(defclass automethod-object () ()
+  (:metaclass automethod-class))
+(defvar *automethod-object* (make-instance 'automethod-object))
+(assert (typep *automethod-object* 'automethod-object))
+\f
+;;; COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-SLOT-DEFINITION should take three arguments, one
+;;; of which is the name of the slot.
+(defvar *compute-effective-slot-definition-count* 0)
+(defmethod compute-effective-slot-definition :before
+    (class (name (eql 'foo)) dsds)
+  (incf *compute-effective-slot-definition-count*))
+(defclass cesd-test-class ()
+  ((foo :initarg :foo)))
+(make-instance 'cesd-test-class :foo 3)
+;;; FIXME: this assertion seems a little weak.  I don't know why
+;;; COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-SLOT-DEFINITION gets called twice in this
+;;; sequence, nor whether that's compliant with AMOP.  -- CSR,
+;;; 2003-04-17
+(assert (> *compute-effective-slot-definition-count* 0))
+\f
+;;; this used to cause a nasty uncaught metacircularity in PCL.
+(defclass substandard-method (standard-method) ())
+(defgeneric substandard-defgeneric (x y)
+  (:method-class substandard-method)
+  (:method ((x number) (y number)) (+ x y))
+  (:method ((x string) (y string)) (concatenate 'string x y)))
+(assert (= (substandard-defgeneric 1 2) 3))
+(assert (string= (substandard-defgeneric "1" "2") "12"))
+\f
 ;;;; success
 (sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104)