0.8.11.6:

[sbcl.git] / tests / pprint.impure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/pprint.impure.lisp b/tests/pprint.impure.lisp
index 32451be..66efdc1 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/pprint.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/pprint.impure.lisp
@@ -135,6 +135,34 @@
         (with-output-to-string (s)
           (write '`(lambda (,x)) :stream s :pretty t :readably t))
         "`(LAMBDA (,X))"))
+;;; more backquote printing brokenness, fixed quasi-randomly by CSR.
+;;; NOTE KLUDGE FIXME: because our backquote optimizes at read-time,
+;;; these assertions, like the ones above, are fragile.  Likewise, it
+;;; is very possible that at some point READABLY printing backquote
+;;; expressions will have to change to printing the low-level conses,
+;;; since the magical symbols are accessible though (car '`(,foo)) and
+;;; friends.  HATE HATE HATE.  -- CSR, 2004-06-10
+(assert (equal
+        (with-output-to-string (s)
+          (write '``(foo ,@',@bar) :stream s :pretty t))
+        "``(FOO ,@',@BAR)"))
+(assert (equal
+        (with-output-to-string (s)
+          (write '``(,,foo ,',foo foo) :stream s :pretty t))
+        "``(,,FOO ,',FOO FOO)"))
+(assert (equal
+        (with-output-to-string (s)
+          (write '``(((,,foo) ,',foo) foo) :stream s :pretty t))
+        "``(((,,FOO) ,',FOO) FOO)"))
+\f
+;;; SET-PPRINT-DISPATCH should accept function name arguments, and not
+;;; rush to coerce them to functions.
+(set-pprint-dispatch '(cons (eql frob)) 'ppd-function-name)
+(defun ppd-function-name (s o)
+  (print (length o) s))
+(let ((s (with-output-to-string (s)
+          (pprint '(frob a b) s))))
+  (assert (position #\3 s)))
 \f
 ;;; success
 (quit :unix-status 104)