0.8.19.3:

[sbcl.git] / tests / print.impure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/print.impure.lisp b/tests/print.impure.lisp
index 73b87d8..4fbe7c1 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/print.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/print.impure.lisp
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
 
 ;;; a spot of random-testing for rational printing
 (defvar *seed-state* (make-random-state))
-(prin1 *seed-state*) ; so that we can reproduce errors
+(print *seed-state*) ; so that we can reproduce errors
 (let ((seed (make-random-state *seed-state*)))
   (loop repeat 42
      do (let ((n (random (ash 1 1000) seed))
@@ -313,5 +313,22 @@
 (assert (string= (format nil "~VR" nil 5) "five"))
 (assert (string= (format nil (formatter "~VR") nil 6) "six"))
 
+;;; CSR inserted a bug into Burger & Dybvig's float printer.  Caught
+;;; by Raymond Toy
+(assert (string= (format nil "~E" 1d23) "1.0d+23"))
+
+;;; Fixed-format bugs from CLISP's test suite (reported by Bruno
+;;; Haible, bug 317)
+(assert (string= (format nil "~1F" 10) "10."))
+(assert (string= (format nil "~0F" 10) "10."))
+(assert (string= (format nil "~2F" 1234567.1) "1234567."))
+
+;;; here's one that seems to fail most places.  I think this is right,
+;;; and most of the other answers I've seen are definitely wrong.
+(assert (string= (format nil "~G" 1d23) "100000000000000000000000.    "))
+
+;;; Adam Warner's test case
+(assert (string= (format nil "~@F" 1.23) "+1.23"))
+
 ;;; success
 (quit :unix-status 104)