1.0.29.1: fix FILL

[sbcl.git] / tests / run-program.impure.lisp

diff --git a/tests/run-program.impure.lisp b/tests/run-program.impure.lisp
index a9d3632..9ef07e5 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/run-program.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/run-program.impure.lisp
@@ -54,10 +54,10 @@
 (defparameter *cat-out* (make-synonym-stream '*cat-out-pipe*))
 
 (with-test (:name :run-program-cat-2)
-  (let ((cat (run-program "/bin/cat" nil :input *cat-in* :output *cat-out* 
+  (let ((cat (run-program "/bin/cat" nil :input *cat-in* :output *cat-out*
                           :wait nil)))
-    (dolist (test '("This is a test!" 
-                    "This is another test!" 
+    (dolist (test '("This is a test!"
+                    "This is another test!"
                     "This is the last test...."))
       (write-line test *cat-in*)
       (assert (equal test (read-line *cat-out*))))
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
 
 ;;; The above test used to use ed, but there were buffering issues: on some platforms
 ;;; buffering of stdin and stdout depends on their TTYness, and ed isn't sufficiently
-;;; agressive about flushing them. So, here's another test using :PTY. 
+;;; agressive about flushing them. So, here's another test using :PTY.
 
 (defparameter *tmpfile* "run-program-ed-test.tmp")
 
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
   *ed*)
 
 (unwind-protect
-     (with-test (:name :run-program-ed) 
+     (with-test (:name :run-program-ed)
        (assert-ed nil "4")
        (assert-ed ".s/bar/baz/g" "")
        (assert-ed "w" "4")
@@ -106,3 +106,32 @@
        (with-open-file (f *tmpfile*)
          (assert (equal "baz" (read-line f)))))
   (delete-file *tmpfile*))
+
+;; Around 1.0.12 there was a regression when :INPUT or :OUTPUT was a
+;; pathname designator.  Since these use the same code, it should
+;; suffice to test just :INPUT.
+(let ((file))
+  (unwind-protect
+       (progn (with-open-file (f "run-program-test.tmp" :direction :output)
+                (setf file (truename f))
+                (write-line "Foo" f))
+                  (assert (run-program "cat" ()
+                                       :input file :output t
+                                       :search t :wait t)))
+    (when file
+      (delete-file file))))
+
+;;; This used to crash on Darwin and trigger recursive lock errors on
+;;; every platform.
+(with-test (:name (:run-program :stress))
+  ;; Do it a hundred times in batches of 10 so that with a low limit
+  ;; of the number of processes the test can have a chance to pass.
+  (loop
+   repeat 10 do
+   (map nil
+        #'sb-ext:process-wait
+        (loop repeat 10
+              collect
+              (sb-ext:run-program "/bin/echo" '
+                                  ("It would be nice if this didn't crash.")
+                                  :wait nil :output nil)))))