0.8.1.44:
[sbcl.git] / tests / stream.pure.lisp
index b0af043..016b31c 100644 (file)
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 (in-package :cl-user)
 
 ;;; Until sbcl-0.6.11.31, we didn't have an N-BIN method for
-;;; CONCATENATED-STRING, so stuff like this would fail.
+;;; CONCATENATED-STREAM, so stuff like this would fail.
 (let ((stream (make-concatenated-stream (make-string-input-stream "Demo")))
       (buffer (make-string 4)))
   (read-sequence buffer stream))
        (assert (< n-actually-read-1 n-to-read))
        (return)))))
 
-;;; success
-(quit :unix-status 104)
+;;; Entomotomy PEEK-CHAR-WRONGLY-ECHOS-TO-ECHO-STREAM bug, fixed by
+;;; MRD patch sbcl-devel 2002-11-02 merged ca. sbcl-0.7.9.32...
+(assert (string=
+        (with-output-to-string (out)
+          (peek-char #\]
+                     (make-echo-stream  
+                      (make-string-input-stream "ab cd e df s]") out)))
+        ;; (Before the fix, the result had a trailing #\] in it.)
+        "ab cd e df s"))
+;;; ...and a missing wrinkle in the original patch, dealing with
+;;; PEEK-CHAR/UNREAD-CHAR on ECHO-STREAMs, fixed by MRD patch
+;;; sbcl-devel 2002-11-18, merged ca. sbcl-0.7.9.66
+(assert (string=
+        (let* ((in-stream (make-string-input-stream "abc"))
+               (out-stream (make-string-output-stream))
+               (echo-stream (make-echo-stream in-stream out-stream)))  
+          (unread-char (read-char echo-stream) echo-stream)  
+          (peek-char #\a echo-stream)
+          (get-output-stream-string out-stream))
+        ;; (Before the fix, the LET* expression just signalled an error.)
+        "a"))
+
+;;; 0.7.12 doesn't advance current stream in concatenated streams
+;;; correctly when searching a stream for a char to read.
+(with-input-from-string (p "")
+  (with-input-from-string (q "foo")
+    (let* ((r (make-concatenated-stream p q)))
+      (peek-char nil r))))
+
+;;; 0.7.14 and previous SBCLs don't have a working INTERACTIVE-STREAM-P
+;;; because it called UNIX-ISATTY, which wasn't defined.
+(with-input-from-string (s "a non-interactive stream")
+  (assert (not (interactive-stream-p s))))
+;;; KLUDGE: Unfortunately it's hard to find a reliably interactive
+;;; stream to test, since it's reasonable for these tests to be run
+;;; from a script, conceivably even as something like a cron job.
+;;; Ideas?
+#+nil (assert (eq (interactive-stream-p *terminal-io*) t))
+
+;;; FILE-POSITION on string-input-streams should work, even with
+;;; :START or :END new positions.
+(let ((stream (make-string-input-stream "abc")))
+  (assert (char= (read-char stream) #\a))
+  (assert (= (file-position stream) 1))
+  (assert (file-position stream 0))
+  (assert (char= (read-char stream) #\a))
+  (assert (file-position stream :start))
+  (assert (char= (read-char stream) #\a))
+  (assert (file-position stream :end))
+  (assert (eq (read-char stream nil 'foo) 'foo)))