(return)))))
;;; Entomotomy PEEK-CHAR-WRONGLY-ECHOS-TO-ECHO-STREAM bug, fixed by
-;;; by MRD patch sbcl-devel 2002-11-02 merged ca. sbcl-0.7.9.32
+;;; by MRD patch sbcl-devel 2002-11-02 merged ca. sbcl-0.7.9.32...
(assert (string=
(with-output-to-string (out)
(peek-char #\]
(make-string-input-stream "ab cd e df s]") out)))
;; (Before the fix, the result had a trailing #\] in it.)
"ab cd e df s"))
+;;; ...and a missing wrinkle in the original patch, dealing with
+;;; PEEK-CHAR/UNREAD-CHAR on ECHO-STREAMs, fixed by MRD patch
+;;; sbcl-devel 2002-11-18, merged ca. sbcl-0.7.9.66
+(assert (string=
+ (let* ((in-stream (make-string-input-stream "abc"))
+ (out-stream (make-string-output-stream))
+ (echo-stream (make-echo-stream in-stream out-stream)))
+ (unread-char (read-char echo-stream) echo-stream)
+ (peek-char #\a echo-stream)
+ (get-output-stream-string out-stream))
+ ;; (Before the fix, the LET* expression just signalled an error.)
+ "a"))
+
+;; 0.7.12 doesn't advance current stream in concatenated streams
+;; correctly when searching a stream for a char to read.
+(with-input-from-string (p "")
+ (with-input-from-string (q "foo")
+ (let* ((r (make-concatenated-stream p q)))
+ (peek-char nil r))))
+
+;; 0.7.14 and previous SBCLs don't have a working INTERACTIVE-STREAM-P
+;; because it called UNIX-ISATTY, which wasn't defined.
+(with-input-from-string (s "a non-interactive stream")
+ (assert (not (interactive-stream-p s))))
+;;; KLUDGE: Unfortunately it's hard to find a reliably interactive
+;;; stream to test, since it's reasonable for these tests to be run
+;;; from a script, conceivably even as something like a cron job.
+;;; Ideas?
+#+nil (assert (eq (interactive-stream-p *terminal-io*) t))