-(in-package :cl-user)
+;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for
+;;;; more information.
+;;;;
+;;;; While most of SBCL is derived from the CMU CL system, the test
+;;;; files (like this one) were written from scratch after the fork
+;;;; from CMU CL.
+;;;;
+;;;; This software is in the public domain and is provided with
+;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for
+;;;; more information.
(load "assertoid.lisp")
+(use-package "ASSERTOID")
(defmacro assert-nil-nil (expr)
`(assert (equal '(nil nil) (multiple-value-list ,expr))))
(defmacro assert-t-t (expr)
`(assert (equal '(t t) (multiple-value-list ,expr))))
+(defmacro assert-t-t-or-uncertain (expr)
+ `(assert (let ((list (multiple-value-list ,expr)))
+ (or (equal '(nil nil) list)
+ (equal '(t t) list)))))
+
(let ((types '(character
integer fixnum (integer 0 10)
single-float (single-float -1.0 1.0) (single-float 0.1)
(real 4 8) (real -1 7) (real 2 11)
+ null symbol keyword
(member #\a #\b #\c) (member 1 #\a) (member 3.0 3.3)
- ;; FIXME: When bug 91 is fixed, add these to the list:
- ;; (INTEGER -1 1)
- ;; UNSIGNED-BYTE
- ;; (RATIONAL -1 7) (RATIONAL -2 4)
- ;; RATIO
+ (integer -1 1)
+ unsigned-byte
+ (rational -1 7) (rational -2 4)
+ ratio
)))
(dolist (i types)
(format t "type I=~S~%" i)
;;; part I: TYPEP
(assert (typep #(11) '(simple-array t 1)))
(assert (typep #(11) '(simple-array (or integer symbol) 1)))
-;;; FIXME: This is broken because of compiler bug 123: the compiler
-;;; optimizes the type test to T, so it never gets a chance to raise a
-;;; runtime error. (It used to work under the IR1 interpreter just
-;;; because the IR1 interpreter doesn't try to optimize TYPEP as hard
-;;; as the byte compiler does.)
-#+nil (assert (raises-error? (typep #(11) '(simple-array undef-type 1))))
+(assert (raises-error? (typep #(11) '(simple-array undef-type 1))))
(assert (not (typep 11 '(simple-array undef-type 1))))
;;; part II: SUBTYPEP
+
(assert (subtypep '(vector some-undef-type) 'vector))
(assert (not (subtypep '(vector some-undef-type) 'integer)))
(assert-nil-nil (subtypep 'utype-1 'utype-2))
(assert-nil-nil (subtypep '(vector t) '(vector utype-2)))
;;; ANSI specifically disallows bare AND and OR symbols as type specs.
-#| ; Alas, this is part of bug 10, still unfixed as of sbcl-0.7.2.
(assert (raises-error? (typep 11 'and)))
(assert (raises-error? (typep 11 'or)))
-|#
+(assert (raises-error? (typep 11 'member)))
+(assert (raises-error? (typep 11 'values)))
+(assert (raises-error? (typep 11 'eql)))
+(assert (raises-error? (typep 11 'satisfies)))
+(assert (raises-error? (typep 11 'not)))
+;;; and while it doesn't specifically disallow illegal compound
+;;; specifiers from the CL package, we don't have any.
+(assert (raises-error? (subtypep 'fixnum '(fixnum 1))))
+(assert (raises-error? (subtypep 'class '(list))))
+(assert (raises-error? (subtypep 'foo '(ratio 1/2 3/2))))
+(assert (raises-error? (subtypep 'character '(character 10))))
+#+nil ; doesn't yet work on PCL-derived internal types
+(assert (raises-error? (subtypep 'lisp '(class))))
+#+nil
+(assert (raises-error? (subtypep 'bar '(method number number))))
+
;;; Of course empty lists of subtypes are still OK.
(assert (typep 11 '(and)))
(assert (not (typep 11 '(or))))
;;; HAIRY domain.
(assert-nil-t (subtypep 'atom 'cons))
(assert-nil-t (subtypep 'cons 'atom))
+;;; These two are desireable but not necessary for ANSI conformance;
+;;; maintenance work on other parts of the system broke them in
+;;; sbcl-0.7.13.11 -- CSR
+#+nil
(assert-nil-t (subtypep '(not list) 'cons))
+#+nil
(assert-nil-t (subtypep '(not float) 'single-float))
(assert-t-t (subtypep '(not atom) 'cons))
(assert-t-t (subtypep 'cons '(not atom)))
;;; corresponding to the NIL type-specifier; we were bogusly returning
;;; NIL, T (indicating surety) for the following:
(assert-nil-nil (subtypep '(satisfies some-undefined-fun) 'nil))
+
+;;; It turns out that, as of sbcl-0.7.2, we require to be able to
+;;; detect this to compile src/compiler/node.lisp (and in particular,
+;;; the definition of the component structure). Since it's a sensible
+;;; thing to want anyway, let's test for it here:
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(or some-undefined-type (member :no-ir2-yet :dead))
+ '(or some-undefined-type (member :no-ir2-yet :dead))))
+;;; BUG 158 (failure to compile loops with vector references and
+;;; increments of greater than 1) was a symptom of type system
+;;; uncertainty, to wit:
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(and (mod 536870911) (or (integer 0 0) (integer 2 536870912)))
+ '(mod 536870911))) ; aka SB-INT:INDEX.
+;;; floating point types can be tricky.
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(member 0.0) '(single-float 0.0 0.0)))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(member -0.0) '(single-float 0.0 0.0)))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(member 0.0) '(single-float -0.0 0.0)))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(member -0.0) '(single-float 0.0 -0.0)))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(member 0.0d0) '(double-float 0.0d0 0.0d0)))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(member -0.0d0) '(double-float 0.0d0 0.0d0)))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(member 0.0d0) '(double-float -0.0d0 0.0d0)))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(member -0.0d0) '(double-float 0.0d0 -0.0d0)))
+
+(assert-nil-t (subtypep '(single-float 0.0 0.0) '(member 0.0)))
+(assert-nil-t (subtypep '(single-float 0.0 0.0) '(member -0.0)))
+(assert-nil-t (subtypep '(single-float -0.0 0.0) '(member 0.0)))
+(assert-nil-t (subtypep '(single-float 0.0 -0.0) '(member -0.0)))
+(assert-nil-t (subtypep '(double-float 0.0d0 0.0d0) '(member 0.0d0)))
+(assert-nil-t (subtypep '(double-float 0.0d0 0.0d0) '(member -0.0d0)))
+(assert-nil-t (subtypep '(double-float -0.0d0 0.0d0) '(member 0.0d0)))
+(assert-nil-t (subtypep '(double-float 0.0d0 -0.0d0) '(member -0.0d0)))
+
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(member 0.0 -0.0) '(single-float 0.0 0.0)))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(single-float 0.0 0.0) '(member 0.0 -0.0)))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(member 0.0d0 -0.0d0) '(double-float 0.0d0 0.0d0)))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(double-float 0.0d0 0.0d0) '(member 0.0d0 -0.0d0)))
+
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(not (single-float 0.0 0.0)) '(not (member 0.0))))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(not (double-float 0.0d0 0.0d0)) '(not (member 0.0d0))))
+
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(float -0.0) '(float 0.0)))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(float 0.0) '(float -0.0)))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(float (0.0)) '(float (-0.0))))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep '(float (-0.0)) '(float (0.0))))
\f
;;;; Douglas Thomas Crosher rewrote the CMU CL type test system to
;;;; allow inline type tests for CONDITIONs and STANDARD-OBJECTs, and
(assert (subtypep 'simple-error 'error))
(assert (not (subtypep 'condition 'simple-condition)))
(assert (not (subtypep 'error 'simple-error)))
- (assert (eq (car (sb-kernel:class-direct-superclasses
+ (assert (eq (car (sb-pcl:class-direct-superclasses
(find-class 'simple-condition)))
(find-class 'condition)))
-
- (assert (eq (car (sb-pcl:class-direct-superclasses (sb-pcl:find-class
- 'simple-condition)))
- (sb-pcl:find-class 'condition)))
-
- (let ((subclasses (mapcar #'sb-pcl:find-class
- '(simple-type-error
- simple-error
- simple-warning
- sb-int:simple-file-error
- sb-int:simple-style-warning))))
- (assert (null (set-difference
- (sb-pcl:class-direct-subclasses (sb-pcl:find-class
- 'simple-condition))
- subclasses))))
-
+
+ #+nil ; doesn't look like a good test
+ (let ((subclasses (mapcar #'find-class
+ '(simple-type-error
+ simple-error
+ simple-warning
+ sb-int:simple-file-error
+ sb-int:simple-style-warning))))
+ (assert (null (set-difference
+ (sb-pcl:class-direct-subclasses (find-class
+ 'simple-condition))
+ subclasses))))
+
;; precedence lists
- (assert (equal (sb-pcl:class-precedence-list
- (sb-pcl:find-class 'simple-condition))
- (mapcar #'sb-pcl:find-class '(simple-condition
- condition
- sb-kernel:instance
- t))))
+ (assert (equal (sb-pcl:class-precedence-list
+ (find-class 'simple-condition))
+ (mapcar #'find-class '(simple-condition
+ condition
+ sb-pcl::slot-object
+ sb-kernel:instance
+ t))))
;; stream classes
- (assert (null (sb-kernel:class-direct-superclasses
- (find-class 'fundamental-stream))))
- (assert (equal (sb-pcl:class-direct-superclasses (sb-pcl:find-class
+ (assert (equal (sb-pcl:class-direct-superclasses (find-class
'fundamental-stream))
- (mapcar #'sb-pcl:find-class '(standard-object stream))))
+ (mapcar #'find-class '(standard-object stream))))
(assert (null (set-difference
- (sb-pcl:class-direct-subclasses (sb-pcl:find-class
+ (sb-pcl:class-direct-subclasses (find-class
'fundamental-stream))
- (mapcar #'sb-pcl:find-class '(fundamental-binary-stream
- fundamental-character-stream
- fundamental-output-stream
- fundamental-input-stream)))))
- (assert (equal (sb-pcl:class-precedence-list (sb-pcl:find-class
+ (mapcar #'find-class '(fundamental-binary-stream
+ fundamental-character-stream
+ fundamental-output-stream
+ fundamental-input-stream)))))
+ (assert (equal (sb-pcl:class-precedence-list (find-class
'fundamental-stream))
- (mapcar #'sb-pcl:find-class '(fundamental-stream
- standard-object
- sb-pcl::std-object
- sb-pcl::slot-object
- stream
- sb-kernel:instance
- t))))
- (assert (equal (sb-pcl:class-precedence-list (sb-pcl:find-class
+ (mapcar #'find-class '(fundamental-stream
+ standard-object
+ sb-pcl::std-object
+ sb-pcl::slot-object
+ stream
+ sb-kernel:instance
+ t))))
+ (assert (equal (sb-pcl:class-precedence-list (find-class
'fundamental-stream))
- (mapcar #'sb-pcl:find-class '(fundamental-stream
- standard-object
- sb-pcl::std-object
- sb-pcl::slot-object stream
- sb-kernel:instance t))))
+ (mapcar #'find-class '(fundamental-stream
+ standard-object
+ sb-pcl::std-object
+ sb-pcl::slot-object stream
+ sb-kernel:instance t))))
(assert (subtypep (find-class 'stream) (find-class t)))
(assert (subtypep (find-class 'fundamental-stream) 'stream))
(assert (not (subtypep 'stream 'fundamental-stream)))))
#.*tests-of-inline-type-tests*)
(tests-of-inline-type-tests)
(format t "~&/done with compiled (TESTS-OF-INLINE-TYPE-TESTS)~%")
+\f
+;;; Redefinition of classes should alter the type hierarchy (BUG 140):
+(defclass superclass () ())
+(defclass maybe-subclass () ())
+(assert-nil-t (subtypep 'maybe-subclass 'superclass))
+(defclass maybe-subclass (superclass) ())
+(assert-t-t (subtypep 'maybe-subclass 'superclass))
+(defclass maybe-subclass () ())
+(assert-nil-t (subtypep 'maybe-subclass 'superclass))
+\f
+;;; Prior to sbcl-0.7.6.27, there was some confusion in ARRAY types
+;;; specialized on some as-yet-undefined type which would cause this
+;;; program to fail (bugs #123 and #165). Verify that it doesn't.
+(defun foo (x)
+ (declare (type (vector bar) x))
+ (aref x 1))
+(deftype bar () 'single-float)
+(assert (eql (foo (make-array 3 :element-type 'bar :initial-element 0.0f0))
+ 0.0f0))
+
+;;; bug 260a
+(assert-t-t
+ (let* ((s (gensym))
+ (t1 (sb-kernel:specifier-type s)))
+ (eval `(defstruct ,s))
+ (sb-kernel:type= t1 (sb-kernel:specifier-type s))))
+;;; bug found by PFD's random subtypep tester
+(let ((t1 '(cons rational (cons (not rational) (cons integer t))))
+ (t2 '(not (cons (integer 0 1) (cons single-float long-float)))))
+ (assert-t-t (subtypep t1 t2))
+ (assert-nil-t (subtypep t2 t1))
+ (assert-t-t (subtypep `(not ,t2) `(not ,t1)))
+ (assert-nil-t (subtypep `(not ,t1) `(not ,t2))))
+\f
;;; success
(quit :unix-status 104)
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff